How does 1 Chronicles 4:30 fit into the broader genealogical context of the chapter? Verse Text “Bethuel, Hormah, Ziklag,” (1 Chronicles 4:30) Immediate Literary Placement 1 Chronicles 4:28–33 lists thirteen towns occupied by the descendants of Simeon. Verse 30 provides the middle triad of that catalogue—Bethuel, Hormah, and Ziklag—bridging the first cluster (Beersheba, Moladah, Hazar-shual) with the concluding list (Beth-markaboth to En-rimmon). The Chronicler preserves the same triplet order found in Joshua 19:4, underscoring continuity with the original land allotments. Structure of 1 Chronicles 4 1. Judahite genealogies (vv. 1–23) 2. Simeonite genealogies and settlements (vv. 24–43) Verse 30 belongs to section 2, which follows this pattern: • Lineage summary (v. 24) • Ten named sons (vv. 25–27) • Town list (vv. 28–33) • Census growth note (v. 27b) • Military expedition and expansion (vv. 34–43) Thus, v. 30 is not a stray geographical marker; it is the geographical evidence that roots Simeon’s family tree in historically attested soil. Genealogical Logic Behind the Town List Old Testament genealogies often conclude with territorial markers, tying people to place (cf. Genesis 10; Numbers 26). By inserting towns after naming sons, the Chronicler shows that Simeon’s identity survived exile through remembered geography. Verse 30’s towns correspond to clans named in vv. 25–27 (e.g., “Benaiah” likely settled Beth-uel; “Ziza” is associated with Ziklag by later tradition). This literary move answers a post-exilic question: “Where is Simeon now?” The answer—embedded towns—verifies the tribe’s ongoing covenant stake. Harmony with Earlier Scripture • Genesis 46:10 lists “Jemuel, Jamin, Ohad, Jachin, Zohar, and Shaul,” ancestors echoed in 1 Chron 4:24. • Numbers 26:12–14 preserves Simeon’s clan totals; 1 Chron 4:27 notes a reduction “not as numerous as Judah” yet still extant. • Joshua 19:1–9 assigns Simeon’s inheritance “within the portion of Judah.” The town list in v. 30 confirms that arrangement by sandwiching Simeonite territory inside Judah’s Negev holdings. No contradictions emerge. Geographical and Archaeological Corroboration • Bethuel—likely at Khirbet es-Sayyid Ghareb, 6 km south of Hebron; Early Iron Age pottery aligns with the settlement window implied by the Conquest (c. 1400–1200 BC). • Hormah—most plausibly Tel Masos; excavations (Aharoni, 1972–75) uncovered fortifications dating to the Judges era that match Judges 1:17’s account of Judah-Simeon cooperation at Hormah. • Ziklag—excavations at Khirbet a-Ra‘i (Garfinkel et al., 2015–19) revealed Philistine pottery overlaying an earlier Judean layer; radiocarbon dates (1010–970 BC) fit David’s residence in 1 Samuel 27–30, lending external support to the Chronicler’s placement. None of these digs overturn a young-earth framework; each fits a post-Flood dispersal and Bronze-to-Iron transition within a 6,000-year chronology. Theological Significance Genealogies are covenant memorials. By naming Bethuel, Hormah, and Ziklag, v. 30 attests that God tracks families, places, and promises. Ziklag, once David’s refuge, later becomes Simeon’s patrimony, illustrating God’s sovereignty over tribal destinies and foreshadowing the Messianic lineage already introduced in Judah’s section (vv. 1–23). Verse 30 therefore links Simeon’s story to the larger messianic tapestry culminating in Christ (Matthew 1). Practical and Devotional Implications If God remembers seemingly obscure towns, He remembers individuals. Verse 30 encourages readers that covenant faithfulness extends beyond prominent figures to lesser-known descendants. A believer’s name is written “in heaven” (Luke 10:20), just as Bethuel, Hormah, and Ziklag are inscribed in Scripture. Summary 1 Chronicles 4:30 functions as a precise geographical footnote anchoring Simeon’s genealogy, harmonizing with earlier allotment records, corroborated by archaeology, preserved flawlessly in manuscripts, and theologically reinforcing God’s meticulous covenant care. |
    |