How does 1 Chronicles 3:12 fit into the genealogy of Jesus Christ?

The verse in focus

1 Chronicles 3:12: “Amaziah his son, Azariah his son, and Jotham his son.”

---

Where the verse sits in David’s royal line

• David

• Solomon

• Rehoboam

• Abijah

• Asa

• Jehoshaphat

• Joram

• Ahaziah

• Joash

• Amaziah – named in 1 Chron 3:12

• Azariah (also called Uzziah, 2 Kings 15:13) – named in 1 Chron 3:12

• Jotham – named in 1 Chron 3:12

• Ahaz

• Hezekiah

• Manasseh

• Amon

• Josiah

• Jeconiah and the exilic line (1 Chron 3:16–17)

This uninterrupted succession preserves God’s covenant promise to David (2 Samuel 7:12-16).

---

How the names appear in Matthew’s genealogy of Jesus

Matthew 1:8-9 reads: “Asa the father of Jehoshaphat, Jehoshaphat the father of Joram, Joram the father of Uzziah, Uzziah the father of Jotham.”

• “Uzziah” in Matthew is the same person called “Azariah” in 1 Chron 3:12.

• Amaziah is omitted in Matthew for literary symmetry, but he is implicitly included because Uzziah (Azariah) is his son.

• Jotham moves the line forward exactly as Chronicles records.

---

Tracing the line from Jotham to Christ

Jotham → Ahaz → Hezekiah → Manasseh → Amon → Josiah → Jeconiah → Shealtiel → Zerubbabel → … → Joseph → Jesus (Matthew 1:9-16; Luke 3:23-27).

Thus 1 Chron 3:12 occupies the central portion of the royal chain that ultimately reaches the Messiah.

---

Why 1 Chronicles 3:12 matters

• Affirms God’s faithfulness: every name confirms the promise that a descendant of David would sit on the throne forever (Psalm 89:3-4).

• Bridges Old and New Testaments: shows the historical roots behind the opening verses of Matthew.

• Strengthens Messianic credentials: Jesus legally inherits the throne through this documented lineage (Luke 1:32-33).

• Demonstrates Scripture’s unity: Chronicles, Kings, and Matthew agree on the essential line, even when individual names are telescoped for structure.

---

Key takeaways for study

• The verse is more than a list; it secures the royal legitimacy of Jesus.

• Name variations (Azariah/Uzziah) reflect common dual naming in the OT yet point to the same historical figure.

• Omissions in Matthew do not break the line; they condense it while preserving every generational link required by Jewish law.

• God preserved David’s dynasty through times of idolatry, exile, and restoration so that “the fullness of time” (Galatians 4:4) would bring forth Christ.