How does 1 Chronicles 3:5 fit into the genealogy of Jesus? Text of 1 Chronicles 3:5 “These were born to him in Jerusalem: Shammua, Shobab, Nathan, and Solomon by Bath-shua daughter of Ammiel.” Immediate Setting—David’s Jerusalem Sons After recording David’s older sons born in Hebron (3:1–4), the Chronicler turns to the sons born after David moved the capital and ark to Jerusalem. Bath-shua (Bathsheba) bears four sons, the third and fourth being Nathan and Solomon. Their joint mention in a single verse creates the critical junction point for the two New Testament genealogies of Jesus. Bathsheba’s Role in Redemptive History Bathsheba’s story (2 Samuel 11–12) moves from tragedy to restoration. By naming her sons here, the Chronicler emphasizes God’s sovereign grace: from an initially sinful union, God brings forth the very lines that will converge in Messiah. The duplication of Bathsheba’s sons in both Samuel and Chronicles shows textual consistency across traditions (cf. 2 Samuel 5:14; 1 Chronicles 14:4). Dual Davidic Lines Foreshadowed in a Single Verse Matthew 1:6–16 traces Jesus’ legal, royal line through Solomon, fulfilling the promise of an everlasting throne (2 Samuel 7:12–16). Luke 3:31 traces His biological ancestry (most naturally through Mary) back to David via Nathan, securing Davidic blood while bypassing the royal curse on Jeconiah (Jeremiah 22:30). 1 Chronicles 3:5 is the only Old Testament verse that places Nathan and Solomon side by side, prefiguring the two complementary genealogies. Legal Succession through Solomon Solomon inherited the throne, and the royal lineage runs through him down to Jeconiah (Matthew 1:11). Though the Babylonian exile ended the earthly monarchy, the legal right to David’s throne continued on record. Joseph, “the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus” (Matthew 1:16), stands as Jesus’ adoptive father; thus Jesus legally inherits Solomon’s throne without Jeconiah’s biological blood. Blood Descent through Nathan and Mary Luke’s substantially different list from David to Jesus switches from Solomon to “Nathan, the son of David” (Luke 3:31). Early Christian writers from Julius Africanus (3rd cent.) onward understood Luke to be giving Mary’s ancestry while using Joseph’s name as her husband and legal representative, consistent with Jewish custom of omitting women’s names in formal genealogies. Through Nathan, Jesus possesses Davidic blood while avoiding Jeconiah’s line, satisfying both the covenant promise and the prophetic curse. Harmony of the Two Genealogies • Different Immediate Objectives—Matthew establishes Jesus’ legal kingship to a Jewish readership; Luke emphasizes universal sonship “of Adam, of God” to a Gentile audience. • Levirate and Adoption Factors—Ancient Jewish genealogies often merged biological and legal fatherhood (cf. Deuteronomy 25:5-6). Shenanigans such as Shealtiel and Zerubbabel appearing in both lists reflect levirate marriage or adoption, not contradiction. • Documentary Support—Josephus notes that the Jews meticulously preserved genealogies up to his day (Against Apion I.7). Before A.D. 70, family scrolls were stored in the Temple archives; both gospel writers could consult still-extant records. Archaeological Corroboration of the House of David • Tel Dan Stele (9th cent. B.C.) references “byt dwd” (“House of David”), anchoring David as a historical monarch. • The “Ophel Inscription” (10th-cent. B.C.) from Jerusalem affirms a sophisticated administrative center in David-Solomon’s era. • Bullae bearing names of royal officials (Gemariah, Shebna, and others) from the City of David excavation demonstrate bureaucratic continuity from Solomon through the exile. These findings lend credence to the Chronicler’s court records. Prophetic Significance of a Dual Line Psalm 89:3-4 promises David a seed forever; Isaiah 11:1 foresees a Branch from Jesse’s stump; Jeremiah 33:17 assures a perpetual Davidic ruler. By merging Nathan’s bloodline with Solomon’s regal rights in one Person, God fulfills all covenant strands without abrogating any prophetic condition. Christological Fulfillment in the Resurrection Romans 1:3-4 links Jesus’ descent “according to the flesh” from David with His vindication “in power by His resurrection.” The same risen Christ seen by over 500 eyewitnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6) seals the credibility of the genealogical claim: death could not nullify the promise; resurrection validates it. Theological Ramifications for Salvation History Because Jesus is simultaneously legal heir and biological son of David, He uniquely qualifies as Messiah. Acts 13:23 states, “From the descendants of this man, God has brought to Israel the Savior Jesus, as He promised.” Every believer, Jew or Gentile, is grafted into this redemptive storyline (Romans 11:17), showing that Scripture’s detailed genealogies serve eternal purposes, not mere antiquarian interests. Practical Confidence in Scripture’s Coherence The dovetailing of Matthew 1, Luke 3, and 1 Chronicles 3:5 models Scripture’s self-consistent tapestry. Apparent discrepancies invite deeper study that reveals richer harmony. Christians can trust that the same God who oversaw meticulous genealogical records also oversees their personal destinies (Ephesians 1:11). Summary Answer 1 Chronicles 3:5 is the pivotal Old Testament verse linking two sons of David—Nathan and Solomon—whose separate lines reappear in Luke 3 and Matthew 1. Through Solomon, Jesus gains legal royal rights; through Nathan, He inherits Davidic blood without the Jeconiah curse. The verse, textually secure and archaeologically corroborated, anchors the Messiah’s genealogy, affirming the integrity of Scripture and the certainty that Jesus is the promised, risen Son of David who alone brings salvation. |
    |