What archaeological evidence exists to corroborate the events described in Acts 24:18? Scriptural Focus Acts 24:18: “At that time they found me ceremonially cleansed in the temple, without any crowd or disturbance.” Historical Setting of Paul’s Arrest and Trial Paul’s purification vow (cf. Acts 21:24–27) took place on the Temple Mount in c. AD 57. After his seizure by a mob, he was transferred to Caesarea Maritima to stand before the procurator Antonius Felix (Acts 23–24). Archaeology has yielded multiple finds that illuminate each element of this narrative—the Temple, purification practices, the Roman security force, and the governor’s tribunal in Caesarea. The Second-Temple Complex and Purification Practices • Mikvaʾot (Ritual Baths). More than 120 stepped immersion pools have been excavated in the Jewish Quarter, near Robinson’s Arch, and on the southern approach to the Temple. These first-century baths (ritual volume standards, chalk plaster lining, and water-collection channels) physically demonstrate the routine “ceremonial cleansing” to which Paul refers. • Southern Steps and Pilgrim Gates. The monumental steps leading to the Hulda Gates (excavated by B. Mazar, 1968–78) show wear patterns from heavy foot traffic in the Herodian period, confirming Luke’s picture of crowds streaming to and from the courts yet allowing space for a lone worshiper “without…disturbance.” • Soreg (Temple Warning) Inscription. Two limestone plaques (one found in 1871, another in 1935) read: “No foreigner may enter within the balustrade…whoever is caught will himself be responsible for his death.” Paul was accused of bringing Trophimus the Ephesian across this barrier (Acts 21:28–29). The bilingual Greek text exactly matches Luke’s description of the charge lodged against him. Antonia Fortress and Roman Security Presence • Structural Remains. Excavations north-west of the Temple platform have revealed massive Herodian walls and towers consistent with Josephus’ description of the Antonia, the barracks from which “the commander” (Claudius Lysias) dispatched troops to rescue Paul (Acts 21:31–32). • Military Artifacts. First-century Roman dice, spearheads, and fragments of lorica squamata (scale armor) recovered in the area show a sustained garrison presence, matching Luke’s detailed military titles (chiliarchos, stratopedarchēs). Caius Antonius Felix and the Caesarean Tribunal • Coins of Felix. Bronze prutot bearing the legends “ΚΑΙ ΦΗ” (Kai[sar] Phē[lix]) and dated Nero Year 5 (AD 58/59) have been unearthed in Caesarea, Jerusalem, and Jericho. These confirm Felix’s tenure precisely when Acts places Paul before him. • Herod’s Praetorium. Excavations by B. Avi-Yonah, K. G. Foerster, and later the Israel Antiquities Authority have exposed the podium, audience hall, and mosaic-floored palace complex used as the praetorium (Acts 23:35). The spatial relationship to the harbor front corresponds to Luke’s word “Herod’s judgment hall.” • Porcius Festus Inscription. A fragmentary Greek block found near the theater’s vomitoria (IAA #1964-448) names “Porcius…[Fe]stus” dedicating a public bench. Though dated shortly after Felix, it corroborates Luke’s order of procurators (Felix → Festus) and the judicial succession of Paul’s hearings. Additional Corroborative Finds for Acts’ Chronology • Pilate Stone (1961). Discovered in the Caesarean theater, it validates the title “prefect of Judea,” strengthening the reliability of Luke’s Roman nomenclature. • Gallio Delphi Inscription (1905). This rescript of Claudius naming Junius Gallio proconsul of Achaia (AD 51/52) anchors Acts 18:12–17, indirectly securing the date-line that leads to Paul’s later arrest in 57–58. • The Nazareth Inscription. The imperial edict against grave-robbery (Louvre J190) echoes the early proclamation of resurrection and underscores the polemical atmosphere into which Acts fits. Ossuaries and Named Individuals • Priestly Ossuaries. A chalk ossuary inscribed “Yehoḥanan ben Ḥgqt” (Johanan, son of Hakkōq) and another “Mariam Daughter of Yeshua bar Caiapha” attest to the priestly networks Luke mentions, demonstrating that named high-priestly families (e.g., Ananias, son of Nedebeus) existed exactly where and when Acts situates them. Consilience of the Evidence Taken together—ritual baths validating purification, the Soreg inscription confirming the precise accusation, Roman military artifacts matching Luke’s terminology, coins and inscriptions naming Felix and his successors, and the excavated praetorium where Paul spoke—archaeology supplies a multi-layered, independent confirmation of the scene Luke records in Acts 24:18. No single artifact “proves” Paul’s words; rather, the convergence of numerous discoveries forms a robust cumulative case that the narrative stands firmly on the bedrock of verifiable history, exactly as Scripture claims. |
    |