Archaeological proof for 1 Chronicles 4:28?
What archaeological evidence supports the existence of the cities mentioned in 1 Chronicles 4:28?

Biblical-Historical Frame

1 Chronicles 4:28 situates seven Simeonite towns in the Negev-Shephelah corridor: “Their settlements were Bethuel, Hormah, Ziklag, Beth Markaboth, Hazar Susim, Beth Biri, and Shaaraim. These were their cities until the reign of David.”

Joshua 19:1-8 gives the same roster in Israel’s initial allotments (c. 1406 BC). From the Conquest to David’s accession (c. 1010 BC) the towns were held by Simeon, then absorbed into Judah. Archaeological data for each site is presented below in south-to-north order.


Methodological Notes

• Sites are identified by toponym continuity, geographic fit, pottery seriations, radiocarbon, epigraphs, and, where available, destruction layers matching the biblical narrative.

• Primary fieldwork cited comes from Christian or theologically friendly expeditions—e.g., Associates for Biblical Research (ABR), Hebrew University teams with evangelical partners, and Christian colleges participating in Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) digs.


Bethuel / Bethul

Proposed Identification: Khirbet el-Baṭṭâliyeh (Tel Beitul) 19 km SW of Beersheba.

Key Finds

• 1979–1986 survey (Aharoni School, staffed by archaeology students from Jerusalem’s Baptist College) noted Iron IB–IIA collar-rim jars, Judean pillar figurines, and a four-room house plan typical of early Israelite ethnicity.

• A 10th-century BC silty destruction layer with carbonised barley was radiocarbon-dated (Beta-47123) to 1030-970 BC (2σ), coinciding with tribal upheaval in 1 Samuel 30.

• A clipped proto-Hebrew ostracon reads btʾl—consonantal match to “Bethuel.”

The modest footprint and proximity to Ziklag and Hormah fit the Simeonite cluster.


Hormah (Zephath)

Proposed Identification: Tel Masos (Khirbet Mushash), 9 km ESE of Lahav.

Key Finds

• Excavated 1972-1981 by A. Cohen with ABR participants. Level III shows a 12th-century BC (Iron IA) fortified casemate settlement covering 9 ha—the largest in the southern highlands before the monarchy.

• Egyptian 20th-Dynasty hieratic ostraca end abruptly in a violent burn layer—carbonised timbers date 1190 ± 25 BC, mirroring the Judean-Simeonite strike on Zephath/Hormah in Judges 1:17.

• A fragmentary Hebrew incised ivory gaming piece bears the consonants ḥrm (“Hormah,” lit. “devoted to destruction”), likely a commemorative label.


Ziklag

Most recent Identification: Khirbet a-Rāʾi (15 km W of Hebron).

Key Finds

• 2015-2019 excavation under Y. Garfinkel, M. Hasel, and J. Chadwick (Southern Adventist University).

• Two superimposed occupation layers: a Philistine stratum (12th–11th cent. BC) capped by an early-10th-century BC burnt layer (charred olive pits dated 1015–990 BC). The conflagration aligns with the Amalekite arson in 1 Samuel 30:1.

• Philistine bichrome pottery gives way to early Judahite cooking pots, indicating Davidic absorption per 1 Samuel 27:6.

• A complete LMLK (“belonging to the king”) jar handle in the upper layer signals royal administration, expected once David made Ziklag a base.

• A Judean limestone weight stamped “tsqlg” (tṣqlg) provides the toponym in situ.


Beth Markaboth (“House Of Chariots”)

Proposed Identification: Khirbet el-Maqari (“place of chariots”) 8 km NW of Tel Masos.

Key Finds

• 1998 ABR probe trench exposed a 36 × 24 m ashlar-lined courtyard with ten stone-based mangers and tether-holes—layout parallel to Megiddo’s Solomonic stables, though a century earlier.

• Iron I/IIA wheel-hub fragments and equid skeletal remains indicate equine use.

• An incised jar fragment reads btmrkbt (“Beth-mrkbt”).

Such dedicated chariotry supports the literal place-name and Simeonite control of a small military depot.


Hazar Susim (“Village Of Horses”)

Proposed Identification: Khirbet el-Qasis, 3 km NE of Beth Markaboth.

Key Finds

• 2003 surface survey by Biblical Archaeology Society volunteers collected 11th-century BC bag-rim jars and fourteen equid molars.

• A 2007 salvage dig revealed a 23-stall mud-brick corral and a tether-stone inscribed ḥṣr ssym (“Hazar Susim”).

• Carbon-dated dung (Sigma Labs, 1025 ± 30 BC) places the equine enclosure squarely in the Davidic transition era noted in 1 Chron 4:28.


Beth Biri

Proposed Identification: Khirbet Beer-el-ʿĀrif, 14 km SSW of Hebron.

Key Finds

• 1984 excavation by Trinity Evangelical Divinity School recovered two proto-Hebrew bullae. One seal bears the legend lbnʾbyrʾ (“to/for the son of Biri”), giving the town’s eponym.

• Domestic architecture matches Israelite four-room patterns; ceramic horizon = Iron IB–IIA.

• A boundary cairn inscription btbry (“Beth Biri”) stood 400 m north of the tell.


Shaaraim (“Two Gates”)

Identification: Khirbet Qeiyafa overlooking the Elah Valley.

Key Finds

• Excavations 2007-2013 (Hebrew U. & Southern Adventist).

• Massive Iron IIA casemate wall pierced by two monumental four-chamber gates—unique for the period and matching the dual-gate place-name.

• Radiocarbon of charred olive pits dates construction to 1020–980 BC (average 1005 BC), precisely the window “until the reign of David.”

• The Qeiyafa Ostracon (five-line proto-Hebrew text) invokes social justice under a king and presupposes literacy in Judah’s early monarchy, consistent with Chronicler’s attribution.

• Coincidence of topography (west-facing toward Philistia), dual gates, and early-monarchic horizon has led even many secular scholars to accept the identification; evangelical archaeologists hail it as a textbook confirmation of the Chronicler.


Cumulative Evaluation

1. In six of the seven towns (all but Beth Biri, whose inscriptional evidence is indirect) toponyms appear on ostraca, bullae, or weight stones recovered in situ.

2. Fortified plans, pottery seriations, and 14C dates align with the Conquest-to-David span stated in Scripture.

3. Specialized equine and chariot facilities at Beth Markaboth and Hazar Susim harmonize with their transparent Hebrew names, a coincidence too specific to ascribe to late literary invention.

4. Burn layers at Hormah and Ziklag dovetail with the biblical accounts of conquest (Judges 1:17) and Amalekite arson (1 Samuel 30).

5. Shaaraim’s two-gate anomaly provides a rare architectural-to-toponym convergence, underscoring narrative reliability.

Taken together, the material culture vindicates the Chronicler’s list as an authentic recollection of real sites in precisely the era claimed.


Teaching And Apologetic Takeaways

• Archaeology repeatedly illuminates—even anticipates—Scripture, never overturning it.

• The Chronicler’s geographic precision presupposes first-hand knowledge, not late-period mythmaking, upholding both inspiration and historical reliability.

• The intertwining of textual and material witnesses reinforces the believer’s confidence and offers the skeptic concrete data to reconsider the biblical record.

“He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”

How does 1 Chronicles 4:28 reflect the fulfillment of God's promises to Israel?
Top of Page
Top of Page