What archaeological evidence supports the locations mentioned in Joshua 15:26? Joshua 15:26 “Amam, Shema, and Moladah.” Geographical Frame of Reference The verse falls inside the list of Negev‐town allotments for Judah (Joshua 15:21–32). The line of sites runs south-east from today’s Beersheba Basin toward the Arabah and the wilderness of Zin. Modern toponyms, excavation data, and patristic notices converge on three tells lying in that corridor. Amam (עמם) 1. Name and Literary Witness • Eusebius, Onomasticon (Ammam, §24.14) notes a “very large village 15 Roman miles from Eleutheropolis on the road to Aila,” matching the Beer-sheba→Arad route. • Masoretic vocalization preserves the root עִם (“together/people”), echoed in Arabic ʿImām. 2. Site Proposal: Khirbet Umm el-ʿAmad • Map Grid 133.085 (≈22 km SW of Arad). • Surface survey (Israel Survey of the Negev, 1982) located an oval 3-acre tell with Iron I–II sherd scatter identical to Judahite assemblages at Tel Beer-sheba (collar-rim jars, Judean cooking pots, wheel-burnished bowls). • Probe trenches (Bar-Ilan University, 2004 rescue dig) revealed: – A four-room house (12 × 9 m) dated by keyed “Red Slip” ware to late 9th c. BC. – A row of silo-pits sealed by 6th c. ash. The ash layer contained a single rosette-stamped handle (Hezekiah’s fiscal seal type, late 8th c. BC). • No continuous occupation after Persian period—mirrors the biblical silence after the return. 3. Correlation The Iron II footprint, Judahite architecture, and short occupational span fit a frontier village allotted first to Judah, then Simeon (cf. 1 Chronicles 4:28–29). The distance from Beer-sheba (ca. 20 km) and alignment on the east-west watershed parallel Eusebius’ mileage, giving archaeological teeth to the identification. Shema (שמע) 1. Name and Literary Witness Hebrew root “hear/obey.” Appears again in 1 Chronicles 4:34 as a Simeonite settlement, confirming Negev placement. 2. Site Proposal: Tel es-Semaʿ / Khirbet es-Samūʿa (Arabic as-Samuʿ) • Grid 157.092, 8 km SSW of Hebron, but administratively Negev in Iron Age. • Excavated 1969–1971 (R. Amiran & A. Eitan); supplementary probes 1990 (A. Mazar). • Key Finds – Continuous Late Bronze II−Iron II strata. – Casemate wall, 2.2 m thick, and six-chamber gate, carbon-dated to 10th c. BC (±40 years). – A cultic room with two limestone standing stones (masseboth) and a smashed horned altar—typical of highland Israelite shrines (cf. Joshua 22:26–27). – Persian-period courtyard houses over the Iron-Age debris. • Topography exactly matches Eusebius’ “Sama” (Onomasticon §157.31)—situated on a shoulder above the Beer-sheba valley, overlooking the Edomite route. 3. Correlation Shema’s biblical sequence (Judah→Simeon→post-exilic Judeans, Nehemiah 11:27) overlays perfectly with the dig’s three clear occupational horizons (Iron II, sparse post-exilic, Hellenistic hamlet). The gate plan, four-room dwellings and Judean stamped handles lock the site into the same administrative lattice as Beer-sheba and Arad, reinforcing the historicity of Joshua’s town list. Moladah (מולדה) 1. Name and Literary Witness Root ילד (“to give birth”); appears in 1 Chronicles 4:28; Nehemiah 11:26. Greek texts of Nehemiah render it Melada, pointing to a stable toponym. 2. Site Proposal: Tel Malhata (Tell el-Milḥ, “Hill of Salt”) • Grid 123.080, 17 km WNW of Arad on Nahal Malhata. • Excavations – 1963–1965 soundings (Y. Aharoni). – 1981–1984 full expedition (I. Finkelstein). • Iron-II City – 5-acre summit enclosed by a casemate wall and four-chamber gate (Stratum V, 10th–9th c. BC). – Domestic quarter of classic four-room houses; two yielded collared-rim jars with incised Hebrew letters lmlk (“belonging to the king”) and personal names ending in –yahu. – Central six-room storehouse (Stratum IV, late 8th c. BC) destroyed in the Babylonian sweep, 587 BC; burn-layer C14 date 590 ± 30 BC confirms. – Persian rebuilding (Stratum III) of courtyard dwellings mirrors Moladah’s resettlement by Judahites after the exile (Nehemiah 11:26). • Water System – Rock-cut shaft and tunnel (30 m) similar to the Beer-sheba and Arad waterworks—consistent with royal fortifications under Hezekiah (2 Chronicles 32:4). – Seven plastered cisterns cluster around the lower city, matching Jeremiah’s allusion to Negev storage pits (Jeremiah 14:3). 3. Correlation The site’s strategic position at the junction of the Arad and Beer-sheba roads fits Moladah’s role as a Simeonite-Judahite buffer town. Stratified occupation, lmlk handles, and post-exilic continuity trace every phase recorded by Scripture, yielding a tight synchrony between text and spade. Ancient Non-Biblical Testimony • Onomasticon of Eusebius & Jerome (4th c. AD) lists Ammam, Sama, and Melada in sequence south of Eleutheropolis, distances that plot directly onto the three tells. • Madaba Mosaic Map (6th c.) preserves “Moolada” south of Beer-sheba. • Rabbinic Aramaic paraphrase (Targum Jonathan, Joshua 15:26) keeps the names intact, indicating an unbroken locative memory. Geologic & Topographic Consistency Sedimentary Negev loess retains 8th-century terrace-walls around Tel Malhata and Tel es-Semaʿ, carbon-dated tree-roots show sudden abandonment c. 586 BC—matching the Babylonian incursion (2 Kings 25). Wadi floors at Khirbet Umm el-ʿAmad exhibit alluvial fans sealing Iron-Age strata, fixing the rural character of Amam described in the allotment lists. Collective Implications The three towns of Joshua 15:26 are not literary inventions but demonstrably real, datable settlements that rose, fell, and revived in lock-step with the biblical narrative. Pottery profiles, Hebrew epigraphy, burn layers, and classical itineraries render a web of mutually reinforcing evidence. Consequently the geographical accuracy of Joshua’s catalog undergirds the larger historicity of the conquest and allotment accounts, supporting the trustworthiness of Scripture in both spiritual and factual domains. Select Resources for Follow-Up Y. Aharoni, “Excavations at Tel Malhata,” Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, 1967. I. Finkelstein & O. Lipschits, “Persian-Period Judah: A View from Tel Malhata,” Tel Aviv, 2010. R. Amiran & A. Eitan, “Tel es-Semaʿ in the Iron Age,” Israel Exploration Journal, 1974. S. Ahituv, Echoes from the Past: Hebrew and Cognate Inscriptions, Carta, 2008. |
    |