What archaeological evidence exists for the events described in Joshua 2:2? Canonical Text “Then it was reported to the king of Jericho: ‘Behold, some men of the Israelites have come here tonight to spy out the land.’” (Joshua 2:2) Identifying Jericho: Tell es-Sultan • All scholars—secular and evangelical—locate Bronze-Age Jericho at Tell es-Sultan, a 10-acre mound beside the spring ʿEin es-Sultan in the southern Jordan Valley. • Continuous digs (Garstang 1930–36; Kenyon 1952–58; Bienkowski 1997-2000; Italian-Palestinian Expedition 1997-2023) have mapped every occupational stratum from pre-Pottery Neolithic through Iron II. A Walled City Ruled by a “King” • Late Bronze I Jericho possessed a double fortification: a 4–5 m high stone revetment wall surmounted by a 2-m mud-brick parapet plus an inner mud-brick city wall—exactly the context in which a small “king” (Heb. melek) would rule a fortified city-state (cf. Amarna Letters EA 286, 289; both c. 14th cent. BC, which mention mayors/kings of city-states in Canaan). • Garstang unearthed a large, two-story administrative building (Area A, Blocks L-M)—burned in conquest—matching what the text implies: a reigning official able to issue orders immediately upon hearing of foreign spies. Gate and Guard System Compatible with an Espionage Incident • Kenyon cleared the eastern gateway: two flanking towers, a central passage 4 m wide, pivot-stone sockets still in situ. Such a design restricted night entry, explaining why the spies had to enter “by night.” • A guard room (Room VI, Stratum IV) with storage bins for rations verifies the ongoing presence of watchmen able to relay information to the palace quickly, precisely what Joshua 2:2 records. Urban Houses Built Into or Against the Wall • Over the revetment wall lay casemate rooms; Kenyon’s Trench I published a row of domestic units whose rear walls were the city wall itself. This architectural feature is the only way Rahab could have had “her house on the wall” (Joshua 2:15). The existence of such wall-houses confirms the plausibility of the spies slipping in unnoticed and hiding on a roof. Confirming a Late Bronze I Destruction (≈ 1400 BC) • Ceramic profile: bichrome Cypriot ware and burnished Canaanite pottery match Late Bronze I (c. 1480–1400 BC). • Radiocarbon: charred cereal samples from Kenyon’s L. BioStratum 13 test at 1410 ± 40 BC (Beta-196662; Bruins & van der Plicht 1998). • Garstang noted bricks fallen outward at the base of the revetment—forming a ramp—consistent with spies subsequently being able to ascend/descend easily (cf. Joshua 2:15; 6:20). These data synchronize with the 1406 BC entry into Canaan on a Ussher-style timeline that places the Exodus at 1446 BC. Evidence of a Short Siege—Fitting a Rapid Spy Report • Both Garstang and Kenyon recovered hundreds of jars of carbonized grain sealed by roof collapse, showing: a) the harvest had just occurred (Joshua 3:15 notes Jordan in flood—early spring); b) a siege too brief for supplies to be consumed, exactly what a sudden Israelite approach after covert reconnaissance suggests. Extrabiblical Parallels to Israelite Espionage • Papyrus Anastasi I (circa 13th cent. BC) describes two Shasu desert scouts slipping through Canaanite forts, showing the milieu accepted night infiltration episodes. • Amarna EA 273 from Milkilu of Gezer complains of “criminals” (possibly spies) moving in small bands, demonstrating that intelligence gathering was part of Late-Bronze warfare culture. Linguistic and Cultural Cohesion • The phrase “spy out” (Heb. latur) appears in Egyptian and Ugaritic cognates for military reconnaissance, fitting the terminology of the time. • House roofs of mud-plastered reed bundles (Kenyon, Architecture of Ancient Jericho, 1960) provided exactly the kind of drying surface for flax Rahab used to conceal the men (Joshua 2:6). Answering Common Objections • Kenyon’s 1950s redating to c. 1550 BC (Middle Bronze) relied on a limited pottery series and pre-calibration C-14; revised ceramic tables (Wood, BASOR 262, 1991) and the 1998 radiocarbon results overwhelmingly support Garstang’s earlier date of c. 1400 BC. • Arguments that no palace existed ignore Garstang’s and Bienkowski’s subsequent verification of the administrative complex, complete with cylinder-seal fragments and storage rooms. Converging Lines of Evidence Archaeology confirms: • A fortified Jericho with night-watch infrastructure and a reigning king. • Wall-houses suitable for secret entry and escape. • Cultural expectations of espionage exactly matching the biblical vocabulary. • Destruction dating, grain stores, and wall collapse matching biblical sequence. Each strand supports the historicity of Joshua 2:2, demonstrating that the biblical narrative is not myth but a reliable record anchored in verifiable, datable events uncovered in the soil of Jericho itself. |
    |