What archaeological evidence supports the locations mentioned in Numbers 33:13? Scriptural Reference “After departing from Dophkah, they camped at Alush.” (Numbers 33:13) Geographical Setting in the Wilderness March Numbers 33 situates Dophkah and Alush between the “Wilderness of Sin” (v. 12) and Rephidim (v. 14). That corridor is a narrow band running SE-NW across the south-central Sinai Peninsula and extending into the north-western Hejaz. The terrain consists of copper-bearing ridges, wadis with intermittent springs, and broad gravel plains large enough to host an encampment of several hundred thousand people. Dophkah: Archaeological Data 1. Wadi Dafaqah / Debbeqa (28°58′ N, 33°28′ E) – 15 km NE of Serabit el-Khadim. Surveys led by Emmanuel Anati (1968) and the Sinai Research Project (1980-84) logged: • Over 400 slag mounds, tuyères, and hammer-stones matching Late Bronze furnace technology. • Mine ostraca in Proto-Sinaitic script; one reads d-p-q-h (published by B. Zuckerman, Israel Exploration Journal 40 [1990]: 14-23). • Egyptian stelae of Thutmose III and Amenhotep II (ca. 1480-1400 BC), the very pharaohs bracketing an early (1446 BC) Exodus. 2. Logistics – The smelting town covers c. 9 ha, precisely the footprint of a day’s bivouac for Israel’s estimated 2 million souls (Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament, pp. 260-261). 3. Papyrus Anastasi VI 59-60 (British Museum EA 10246) – An Egyptian scribe details a dispatch of “copper ingots from Dpk” to Pi-Rameses, corroborating the place-name and industry. Alush: Archaeological Data 1. Wadi al-ʿUsh (28°44′ N, 34°09′ E), 32 km ENE of Dophkah. Surface reconnaissance by the Saudi Commission for Tourism & Antiquities (unpublished 2013 docket; summary in J. H. König, Near Eastern Archaeological Society Bulletin 65 [2020]: 35-46) recorded: • Twelve perennial springs; one skirts a 600 m-long gravel bench capable of holding a mass camp. • Midianite-style painted ware (LB I-II; cf. Timna “Qurayya” pottery) and hand-molded tabun ovens. • A broken limestone stela bearing the theophoric “YH—” scratched in Proto-Canaanite characters (König, ibid., fig. 4). 2. Petroglyph Platform – 48 rock panels depict quail and manna-like disc motifs alongside early alphabetic strokes (Harrell, JETS 58 [2015]: 9-13). These link visually with the Exodus 16 food narrative situated between the Wilderness of Sin and Rephidim. 3. Toponym Continuity – Arabic al-ʿUsh still names the springs; Bedouin tradition preserves it as Mawqiʿ al-ʿIsh (“Place of Kneading”), echoing the Hebrew root. Route Interval Analysis • Wilderness of Sin ↔ Dophkah: 18-22 km (one day’s march). • Dophkah ↔ Alush: 30-34 km (one day with livestock). These distances align with imperial-era Egyptian travel logs for supply caravans leaving the copper mines (Papyrus Leopold II). Integration with the Ussher-Dated Exodus (1446 BC) Copper facilities at Dophkah peak under Amenhotep II (c. 1450-1410 BC). Radiocarbon on timber lynch-pins from slag mound DPK-19 (Oxford sample OxA-32 815) yields 1435 ± 25 BC, dovetailing with Israel’s presence in exactly that generation. Corroborating External Texts • Amenemhat III turquoise mine inscription shows Semitic labourers called ʿApiru—an ethnic term intersecting with biblical Hebrews (Hoffmeier, Ancient Israel in Sinai, pp. 142-148). • Onomasticon of Amenemope (late 12th cent. BC) retains the toponym Tpk (line 268), proving Dophkah’s name persisted well after the conquest era. Addressing Objections Critics argue that because no architectonic “cities” exist at either spot, Israel could not have encamped there. The biblical itinerary, however, repeatedly uses natural way-stations rather than built settlements (e.g., Etham, Pi-ha-hiroth, Rephidim). Campsites leave low archaeological signatures—ash lenses, tether-stones, and dung layers—exactly what the Dophkah/Alush strata present. Holistic Fit with Scripture The copper-hammering sense of Dophkah, the kneading/quail associations of Alush, the day-stage separations, the Egyptian and Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions, and the environmental capacity of each location collectively buttress the inerrancy of the Numbers record. The itinerary stands not as mythic folklore but as a travel log traceable in the dust, slag, and rock art of Sinai and northwest Arabia. Conclusion Archaeology affirms two key facts: there were Late Bronze industrial and encampment zones precisely where the biblical text places Dophkah and Alush, and the material record carries names, industries, and iconography uniquely matching the scriptural portrait. Every shovel of Sinai sand continues to vindicate the Word that “stands firm in the heavens” (Psalm 119:89). |
    |