Asa's commitment vs. other kings?
How does Asa's commitment compare to other kings in 1 and 2 Kings?

The scene is set (1 Kings 15:9)

“In the twentieth year of Jeroboam king of Israel, Asa became king of Judah.”


Asa’s standout devotion

• “Asa did what was right in the eyes of the LORD, as David his father had done.”

• He removed the idolatry his predecessors tolerated:

 – “He banished the male shrine prostitutes from the land.”

• He addressed family compromise by deposing his own grandmother Maacah (1 Kings 15:13).

• Temple treasures were restored and protected (1 Kings 15:15).

• His inner life matched his reforms: “Asa's heart was fully devoted to the LORD all his days.”


Kings who fell short

• Solomon’s later years—“his heart was not fully devoted to the LORD his God” (11:4).

• Rehoboam—“Judah did evil in the sight of the LORD” (14:22).

• Abijam—“He walked in all the sins his father had done before him” (15:3).

• Nadab—“He did evil in the sight of the LORD and walked in the way of his father” (15:26).

• Baasha, Omri, and Ahab escalate wickedness:

 – Omri “did evil… even worse than all before him” (16:25).

 – Ahab “did more to provoke the LORD than did all the kings” (16:33).


A few who excelled

• Jehoshaphat “walked in all the ways of his father Asa; he did not turn aside from them” (22:43).

• Hezekiah “trusted in the LORD God of Israel; no one was like him among all the kings” (2 Kings 18:5).

• Josiah—“No king before or after Josiah turned to the LORD with all his heart, soul, strength” (23:25).


Side-by-side observations

• Heart posture: Asa, Hezekiah, and Josiah receive similar praise for wholehearted devotion; most other rulers are labeled “evil.”

• Reform scope: Asa targets idols and cult prostitution; Hezekiah smashes the bronze serpent; Josiah cleanses the land and renews covenant.

• Remaining high places: Asa leaves some (15:14); Hezekiah and Josiah remove them entirely.

• Longevity of faithfulness: Asa is commended “all his days,” whereas Solomon, Joash, and Amaziah start well but falter.

• Influence on successors: Jehoshaphat deliberately imitates Asa, showing generational impact that many northern kings never achieve.


Placing Asa on the commitment scale

1. Rebel kings (Jeroboam, Omri, Ahab) – active promotion of idolatry.

2. Compromised kings (Solomon’s later years, Rehoboam, Abijam) – divided loyalties.

3. Reforming but partial (Asa) – wholehearted heart, strong reforms, yet some high places left.

4. Reforming and thorough (Hezekiah, Josiah) – sweeping nationwide renewal.


Core truths highlighted by Asa’s life

• Genuine commitment starts with the heart and expresses itself in decisive action.

• Family ties and cultural norms must yield to covenant loyalty.

• Even great steps of faith leave room for continued growth, as seen in the high places Asa allowed to remain.

• A faithful king sets a precedent for future generations, illustrated by Jehoshaphat’s imitation of Asa.


Conclusion in one sentence

Among the rulers of 1 and 2 Kings, Asa shines as an early model of wholehearted devotion whose reforms surpass most predecessors and many successors, though later kings like Hezekiah and Josiah would build on his foundation with even fuller obedience.

What lessons from Asa's reign can we apply to our leadership roles?
Top of Page
Top of Page