What historical events might Daniel 7:20 be referencing? Text of Daniel 7:20 “and about the ten horns on its head and the other horn that came up, before which three fell—the horn whose appearance was more imposing than the others, with eyes and a mouth that spoke words of arrogance.” Immediate Literary Context Daniel is receiving a night-vision of four beasts that rise “from the great sea” (7:3). The fourth beast is “terrifying, dreadful, and exceedingly strong” (7:7), representing the final world empire before the coming of the Son of Man. The ten horns depict successive kings growing out of that empire; the “other horn” emerges later, topples three of the ten, boasts arrogantly, persecutes the saints, and is finally destroyed at divine judgment. Symbolism of Horns in Scripture In Hebrew apocalyptic literature a horn consistently pictures a king or realm (1 Samuel 2:10; Psalm 75:10; Zechariah 1:18-21). Ten denotes completeness (Revelation 13:1), so ten horns imply the full political strength of the beast. A “little” horn that becomes “more imposing” speaks of an initially obscure ruler who rises to dominance by subduing rivals. Major Historical Proposals 1. Seleucid-Maccabean View (Antiochus IV Epiphanes, 175-164 BC) • Ten horns = sequence of Seleucid monarchs from Seleucus I to Antiochus IV. • Three uprooted = Seleucus IV, Heliodorus (usurper), Demetrius I, whom Antiochus displaced (cf. 1 Macc 1:10-20). • Little horn = Antiochus IV, whose persecution, blasphemies, and “arrogant words” (cf. 1 Macc 1; Josephus, Ant. 12.246-253) match Daniel 7:25. Strengths: precise Maccabean fit; affirmed by Josephus and many modern commentators. Weaknesses: places fourth beast in Hellenistic period, forcing an unnatural Babylon-Media-Persia-Greece sequence and ignoring explicit Roman imagery (iron teeth, trampling) that parallels Daniel 2’s iron legs—commonly identified with Rome by Qumran community (4Q174), the church fathers (Hippolytus, Irenaeus), and medieval Jewish exegetes (Saadia Gaon). 2. Imperial-Roman View (Historic Pre-A.D. 70 Fulfillment) • Fourth beast = unified Roman Empire (63 BC–A.D. 476). • Ten horns = Julio-Claudian and Flavian lineups, or ten short-lived emperors from Julius to Vespasian (Julius, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Vespasian). • Three uprooted = Galba, Otho, Vitellius (A.D. 69 “year of three emperors”) removed before Vespasian; the “little horn” = Vespasian’s son Domitian, infamous for blasphemy and persecution (Suetonius, Dom. 13). Strengths: maintains Rome as fourth empire; matches immediate post-apostolic persecutions. Weaknesses: “little horn” still historically limited, whereas Daniel foresees climactic annihilation by the Ancient of Days (7:11). 3. Post-Roman-Europe View (Classical Protestant Historicism) • Ten horns = ten Germanic successor kingdoms after the West fell in A.D. 476: Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, Suevi, Burgundians, Heruli, Alamanni, Anglo-Saxons, Lombards, Franks. • Three uprooted = Heruli (493), Vandals (534), Ostrogoths (554) removed during Byzantine reconquest. • Little horn = papal institution rising from 6th–8th centuries; eyes = claimed spiritual insight, mouth = ex cathedra pronouncements. Strengths: explains millennial influence, link to later persecutions of dissenters. Weaknesses: papacy never fully destroyed, and Daniel envisions abrupt judgment rather than gradual decline. 4. Future Revived-Roman View (Futurist/Premillennial) • Fourth beast = a final, end-time confederacy centered in the lands of ancient Rome. • Ten horns = simultaneous coalition of ten rulers (cf. Revelation 17:12-13). • Three uprooted = three members replaced by the coming Antichrist. • Little horn = personal Antichrist who magnifies himself “above every god” (Daniel 11:36), persecutes saints for 3½ prophetic years (7:25), and is slain at Christ’s Parousia (2 Thessalonians 2:8; Revelation 19:19-20). Strengths: harmonizes Daniel 7, Daniel 9:27, Matthew 24:15, 2 Thessalonians 2, and Revelation 13 and 17; matches Jesus’ own future-oriented reading (Matthew 24:15); conforms to patristic expectation of a last tyrant (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.26). Weaknesses: relies on still-future events, so historical verification is pending. Correlation with Daniel 2 and Daniel 8 The iron legs and ten toes of Nebuchadnezzar’s statue parallel the ten horns: both employ iron imagery and culminate in a singular kingdom crushed by the Stone (Messiah). Daniel 8’s “small horn” (Antiochus IV) appears different in chronology and origin—rising from a Greek goat rather than the fourth beast—suggesting Antiochus is a type, not the terminus, of Daniel 7’s prophecy. Archaeological and Textual Confirmation • Dead Sea Scroll 4QDana contains Daniel 7, dated c. 125 BC, proving the vision existed before the Maccabean events it predicts—refuting late-date theories. • Babylonian Astronomical Diaries and the Antiochus Cylinder corroborate Antiochus IV’s self-deifying language (“King Antiochus, god manifest”). • The Codex Vaticanus (4th cent.), Codex Sinaiticus, and ca. 90 MT manuscripts show remarkable verbal stability for Daniel 7, supporting transmission integrity. Consistent Theological Trajectory All proposals converge on three constant themes: 1. A succession of earthly powers opposed to God culminates in a uniquely blasphemous ruler. 2. The saints endure persecution but ultimately receive “the kingdom and dominion and greatness of the kingdoms under all heaven” (7:27). 3. Final victory belongs to the Son of Man, fulfilled historically in Christ’s resurrection (Matthew 28:18) and consummated at His return. Conclusion Daniel 7:20 can reasonably reference (a) Antiochus IV within the Seleucid era, (b) Domitian or another early Roman emperor, (c) the papal ascendancy in post-Roman Europe, or (d) a coming Antichrist heading a ten-king coalition. Each scenario displays partial or typological fulfilment; ultimate completion awaits the bodily return of Jesus Christ, when “the court will convene, and his dominion will be taken away, annihilated, and destroyed forever” (Daniel 7:26). |
    |