Does Genesis 2:19 imply that humans have authority over animals? Genesis 2:19 “And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.” Immediate Literary Setting Genesis 2 presents a zoom-lens view of Day 6 (cf. 1:24-31). Adam has just been placed “in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it” (2:15), a stewardship motif that frames the naming event. Verse 19 follows directly, portraying God’s parade of animals before the man. Naming in the Ancient Near East and in Scripture In royal grants across Mesopotamia, to name is to exercise jurisdiction (e.g., Akkadian kudurru texts). Scripture mirrors this principle: God names Day, Night, Heaven, Earth, and the patriarchs—acts of sovereign prerogative. When Adam names the animals, he images that divine sovereignty on a creaturely level, indicating delegated authority. Canonical Integration Genesis 1:26-28 expressly grants “dominion… over every living thing that moves on the earth.” Genesis 2:19 is the narrative enactment of that mandate. Psalm 8:6-8 interprets the mandate as ongoing: “You have made him ruler over the works of Your hands… all sheep and oxen, and even the beasts of the field” . James 3:7 echoes the same worldview post-Fall and post-Flood, confirming the mandate’s persistence. Comparative Theological Thread Where surrounding cultures deified animals, Scripture differentiates humankind as God’s image-bearer and steward. The Flood narrative (Genesis 9:2-3) reaffirms human headship while adding accountability for life-blood, balancing privilege with moral restraint. Christological Fulfillment The Second Adam exercises ultimate lordship (1 Corinthians 15:27). Mark 1:13 portrays Jesus among wild beasts in perfect dominion. His riding of an unbroken colt (Mark 11:2-7) and commanding a fish to deliver a coin (Matthew 17:27) reprise Edenic authority, foreshadowing “the restoration of all things” (Acts 3:21). Patristic and Reformation Witness • Augustine: “In the very naming of the animals Adam showed a certain authority as set over them” (City of God XII.21). • Aquinas: “Naming manifests dominion” (ST I.96.4). • Calvin: “Adam’s power in naming was a symbol of sovereignty” (Commentary on Genesis 2:19). Ethical Stewardship, Not Exploitation Authority is coupled with service (Proverbs 12:10). The Mosaic Law protects animals (Deuteronomy 25:4), and Proverbs attaches righteousness to humane care, confirming that dominion is benevolent stewardship, not tyranny. Scientific and Behavioral Corroboration Domestication studies (e.g., barley and canine genetics) show humanity guiding animal capacities—an empirical echo of the biblical hierarchy. Behavioral science demonstrates human-animal bonding and training as a directional, not reciprocal, authority structure. Answering Common Objections Objection: “The passage only records taxonomy, not dominion.” Response: Taxonomy itself presupposes hierarchical cognition; more importantly, Scripture overtly pairs naming with rulership elsewhere, and the broader context (Genesis 1:28) defines the intention behind the act. Objection: “Authority ended at the Fall.” Response: Post-Fall texts (Genesis 9; Psalm 8; James 3) still describe humans taming creatures. The Fall introduces friction, not abolition of rank. Archaeological and Manuscript Attestation • The Dead Sea Scroll 1QGen confirms the consonantal text of Genesis 2:19 matches the Masoretic line, preserving the dominion nuance. • The Ebla tablets illustrate contemporary naming protocols by rulers, supporting the cultural backdrop assumed in Genesis. Conclusion Yes. Genesis 2:19, read in its linguistic, canonical, theological, and historical context, plainly implies that humans possess God-delegated authority over the animal kingdom. The naming rite is the inaugural exercise of that authority—an authority that endures, is modeled perfectly in Christ, and is to be practiced as wise, compassionate stewardship. |
    |