What historical evidence supports the events described in 1 Kings 15? Canonical Setting of 1 Kings 15 1 Kings 15 narrates the short reign of Abijam (also called Abijah) over Judah (c. 913–911 BC) and introduces the longer reign of Asa (c. 911–870 BC). Verse 3 summarizes Abijam’s spiritual condition: “And he walked in all the sins that his father before him had done, and his heart was not fully devoted to the LORD his God, as the heart of his father David had been.” Synchronizing the Biblical Chronology with External Records • Shishak’s campaign against Rehoboam in 925 BC (1 Kings 14:25 f.) appears on the Bubastite Portal at Karnak as a list of Judean towns conquered by “Shoshenq I.” This fixed point calibrates the succession of Rehoboam → Abijam → Asa. • Academic reconstructions that begin with Shoshenq I and use the co-regencies implied in 1 Kings 15:23 and 2 Chronicles 16:1 align Abijam’s two-year reign with 913–911 BC, well inside the archaeological horizon known as Iron IIA. Archaeological Corroboration for the Davidic Line and Early Judah • Tel Dan Stele (mid-9th cent. BC) names “the House of David,” establishing the Davidic dynasty as a recognized political entity within a century of David and Solomon. • Khirbet Qeiyafa (Judah’s Shephelah, 10th cent. BC) yielded an ostracon referencing social and cultic reforms reminiscent of Deuteronomic theology, demonstrating early literacy and covenantal language in Judah prior to Abijam. • Jerusalem’s Large-Stone Structure and Stepped-Stone Support (10th–9th cent. BC) show royal construction compatible with a reigning Davidic house capable of sustaining the bureaucracy described in Kings and Chronicles. Corroboration for Asa and Ben-Hadad Abijam’s son Asa bribed “Ben-Hadad son of Tabrimmon” of Aram-Damascus to break treaty with Baasha of Israel (1 Kings 15:18-20). The Zakkur Stele (early 8th cent. BC) and the Ben-Hadad Seal (9th cent. BC, Israel Museum) attest to a line of Aramean kings bearing that throne name, matching the long-lived dynasty implied by the text. Geopolitical Landscape Reflected in 1 Kings 15 • Border Fortresses: Excavations at Tell Beit Mirsim, Khirbet Rabud, and Tel Beersheba reveal fortified sites rebuilt in the 10th–9th cent. BC, consistent with Judah’s defensive posture after Shishak’s incursion and during Asa’s reforms (2 Chronicles 14:6-7). • Trade and Tribute: Aramaic weight indicators from Tel Dan and Phoenician-style pottery in Judah illustrate economic interchange matching the diplomatic gifts described between Judah and Aram. Conclusion No single inscription names Abijam, yet the convergence of (1) synchronisms with Shoshenq I, (2) the historically-attested “House of David,” (3) archaeological evidence for royal Judah in the correct horizon, (4) external confirmation of Ben-Hadad’s dynasty, and (5) early, stable textual transmission together supply a coherent external framework that corroborates the events summarized in 1 Kings 15:3 and its surrounding narrative as authentic, reliable history. |
    |