What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Chronicles 24:23? Text of the Passage “At the turn of the year, the army of Aram went up against Joash. They came to Judah and Jerusalem and destroyed all the leaders of the people and sent all the plunder to the king of Damascus.” (2 Chronicles 24:23) Parallel Biblical Accounts 2 Kings 12:17-18 supplies the same event in complementary detail, adding that the attacker was “Hazael king of Aram,” that he had just captured Gath, and that Joash (Jehoash) ransomed Jerusalem by emptying the Temple treasuries. The harmony of Kings and Chronicles establishes an internally consistent primary record. Chronological Setting Ussher’s dating places Joash’s thirty-year reign 835–796 BC; the Aramean incursion falls c. 800 BC, near the end of Hazael’s reign (c. 843–796 BC). This fits the wider Near-Eastern chronologies derived from the Assyrian Eponym Canon and the Battle of Qarqar inscription (853 BC). Extrabiblical Written Evidence • Assyrian Annals of Shalmaneser III (Kurkh Monolith, BM 113890; Black Obelisk, BM 118884). These slabs record repeated clashes with “Hazael of Damascus,” calling him “son of a nobody,” listing 1,121 of his chariots captured (c. 841 BC). They confirm both Hazael’s historicity and his military reach. • Tel Dan Stele (IAA 1994-1). Unearthed 1993-94, this Aramaic victory inscription—generally attributed to Hazael—boasts of defeating the “king of Israel” and the “house of David.” It confirms (a) an Aramean monarch campaigning deep into Israel-Judah territory, (b) the Davidic monarchy’s existence, and (c) a 9th-century war context matching Joash’s era. • Arslan Tash Ivories (Louvre AO 20910, etc.). Several pieces carry the incised phrase “Belonging to Hazael.” Recovered from Assyrian spoil heaps at Nimrud, they demonstrate Hazael’s wealth and far-flung conquests before Assyria overran his holdings—exactly the profile needed for the sudden raid recorded in 2 Chronicles 24. • Zakkur Stele (Louvre AO 8183, c. 785 BC). King Zakkur of Hamath recounts a coalition led by “Ben-Hadad son of Hazael” that besieged his capital. Though slightly later, it confirms that Hazael’s house remained the dominant Aramean power threatening Israel and its neighbors. Archaeological Corroboration of Hazael’s Southern Campaigns • Tell es-Safi/Gath destruction layer (Level A3, radiocarbon ~830s BC). Excavations led by Aren Maeir show massive siege damage, siege-torched walls, and Hazael-style Syrian sling stones—precisely matching 2 Kings 12:17’s statement that Hazael “captured Gath” just before turning on Jerusalem. • Tel Rehov (Stratum IV) and Hazor (Stratum X). Both sites bear mid-9th-century burn layers with Aramean arrowheads and distinctive Syrian jars. Archaeologist Amihai Mazar identifies the culprit as Hazael, tracing the same campaign arc toward Judah. • Stepped-stone retaining wall and 9th-century administrative building in Jerusalem’s City of David (Area G, Eilat Mazar 2006). While not a destruction layer, the presence of royal-scale architecture predating Hezekiah displays that Joash’s Jerusalem was worth plundering, matching the biblical note that Temple and palace treasuries were rich pickings. Geopolitical and Military Plausibility Chronicles states the Aramean force was “small in number, yet the LORD delivered a very great army into their hand” (24:24). Hazael’s method fits: swift raiding parties of chariots and cavalry striking past Israel’s weakened northern defenses after Jehu’s purge (2 Kings 10). From Gath they could follow the Sorek Valley straight to Jerusalem, needing no large siege train—only elite troops, which the Assyrian annals show Hazael possessed. Harmonizing Scriptural Motifs Chronicles interprets the successful Aramean raid theologically: Judah “abandoned the LORD…so judgment was executed on Joash” (24:24). Kings adds that Joash bought off Hazael with Temple wealth, a humiliation for a Davidic king who once repaired that very Temple. The convergence of theology and sober political reporting offers an internally coherent narrative later echoed by the prophet-historian Hosea (7:11). Theological Implication of the Evidence That multiple independent lines—Assyrian, Aramean, Judean—converge on a single dramatic moment validates Scripture’s historical core and, by extension, the trustworthy character of the God who speaks within it. The same God who judged Joash later vindicated His covenant by raising Jesus from the dead (Acts 2:32)—the ultimate, historically attested miracle. Conclusion Assyrian royal inscriptions, the Tel Dan stele, Aramean ivories, burn layers across the southern Levant, and consistent manuscript transmission combine to anchor 2 Chronicles 24:23 in solid 9th-century history. Far from being legendary, the Aramean raid under Hazael stands as a well-attested episode that coheres with Scripture’s broader narrative and with the archaeological footprint left in Judah and its neighbors. |
    |