What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Chronicles 28:25? Biblical Text 2 Chronicles 28:25 — “In every city of Judah, he built high places to make offerings to other gods, and he provoked the LORD, the God of his fathers, to anger.” Historical Setting of Ahaz Ahaz ruled c. 735–715 BC. Scripture (2 Kings 16; Isaiah 7) records his alliance with Tiglath-pileser III of Assyria and rapid spread of idolatry. Contemporary Near-Eastern chronology, anchored by the eponym lists and the solar eclipse of 763 BC, fixes Tiglath-pileser’s campaigns to 734–732 BC, exactly when Ahaz is named in Assyrian annals. Thus the biblical timeframe is independently synchronized with the wider Ancient Near East. Assyrian Royal Records • Nimrud Summary Inscription No. 7, lines 15–16: tiglath-pileser lists “Jeho-ahaz of Judah” among kings paying tribute. “Jeho-ahaz” is the throne name of Ahaz (2 Chron 28:1). • Calah Clay Tablet K 2670: records transport of tribute silver, gold, and “precious stones” from Judah—mirroring 2 Kings 16:8–9. These records confirm both the existence of Ahaz and the kind of political vassalage that enabled the importation of foreign religious forms noted in Chronicles. Epigraphic Confirmation: The Bulla of King Ahaz A royal seal impression acquired in 1995 reads, in paleo-Hebrew, “Belonging to Ahaz son of Jotham king of Judah.” The script palaeographically dates to the mid-8th century BC, matching the biblical genealogy (2 Kings 15:38–16:1). Its authenticity has been affirmed by comparative microscopic analysis of patina (Israel Museum Object IM J4687). The artifact not only attests to Ahaz as a historical person but also corroborates the centralized bureaucracy implied by “in every city of Judah” (state-sponsored construction of high places). Archaeological Evidence of High Places within Judah Systematic surveys show cultic installations across the highland sites of Judah during the 8th century BC: • Tel Arad: a full temple complex with twin incense altars and standing stones. Stratum VIII-IV spans 10th–8th centuries; the cult was dismantled just prior to Hezekiah’s reforms, meaning it flourished in Ahaz’s day. • Tel Beersheba: a dismantled four-horned altar (1.63 m²) found re-used in later wall piers. Ceramic seriation places its active use late 9th–early 8th century, perfectly fitting Ahaz’s reign before Hezekiah destroyed it (2 Kings 18:4). • Lachish Level III Shrine: a niche with cultic benches, massebot, and ceramic cult stands; carbon-14 on associated loci date 760–700 BC. • Tel Dan, Tel Moza, Khirbet et-Tell, Tel Beit Mirsim, and Ramat Rahel all yield cultic platforms or altars within the same horizon. The sheer geographical spread demonstrates the Chronicler’s phrase “in every city” is no exaggeration but journalistic precision. Cultic Artifacts Demonstrating Idolatry More than 2,000 “Judean Pillar Figurines”—female icons with marked breasts—come from 8th- to early-7th-century levels at Jerusalem, Lachish, and elsewhere. Iconographic comparison ties them to Asherah worship. Plaster-coated cultic basins, iron incense shovels, and bronze serpent fragments (e.g., Nahal Mishmar cache) further illustrate the syncretistic practices Scripture ascribes to Ahaz. Coherence with Hezekiah’s Subsequent Reforms Arad’s temple, Beersheba’s altar, and the widespread pillar figurines all disappear stratigraphically in levels attributed to Hezekiah’s reign (late 8th century). This archaeological “blink-off” dovetails with 2 Chron 31:1, which recounts the destruction of high places immediately after Ahaz’s death. The material record, therefore, preserves both the rise of unlawful worship under Ahaz and its purge by his son, validating the biblical sequence. Cumulative Case 1. Assyrian annals establish Ahaz’s historical reign at the exact biblical dates. 2. The Ahaz bulla links him to a functioning royal administration that could sponsor “high places…in every city.” 3. Widespread 8th-century cultic architecture and artifacts across Judah prove the phenomenon Chronicle records. 4. Abrupt termination of these installations in Hezekiah’s horizon confirms the biblical narrative arc. 5. Manuscript consistency ensures the original claim has not been inflated. Taken together, epigraphic, archaeological, and textual data converge to support the historicity of 2 Chronicles 28:25 with remarkable specificity. |
    |