What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Chronicles 36:1? Synchronism with Egyptian Sources 1. Pharaoh Neco II’s northward campaigns are mentioned in several Late Period Egyptian inscriptions: • Karnak Reliefs of Neco II list a western Asiatic expedition in Year 1–2 of his reign. • The Cairo Stela CG C25666, erected at Migdol on the Sinai route, commemorates his progress toward “the land of Harran,” precisely the campaign during which Josiah was slain and Jehoahaz elevated (ANET pp. 293–294). 2. The narrative that Jehoahaz was installed first and removed three months later by Neco (2 Kings 23:33) fits the Egyptian assertion of dominance in Judah at that window, corroborating the biblical sequence. Babylonian Chronicle (ABC 5/BM 21946) and Astronomical Diaries The Babylonian Chronicle for Years 21–22 of Nabopolassar notes Neco II’s presence in northern Syria (battle for Harran) and Babylon’s subsequent countermove (Wiseman, Chronicles of the Chaldean Kings, pp. 64–66). Although Jehoahaz is not named, the political vacuum in Judah that the Chronicle describes dovetails with the “people of the land” seizing initiative to enthrone a son of Josiah before Egyptian arrival—exactly the biblical order. Convergence is tightened by astronomical diary VAT 4956 (Year 37 Nebuchadnezzar = 568/567 BC) anchoring the Babylonian timeline. Back‐counting regnal years from that fixed point yields 609 BC for Jehoahaz, matching Ussher’s 3394 AM and harmonizing biblical and Mesopotamian chronologies. Archaeological Strata from Josiah to Jehoahaz 1. Megiddo Layer IVA (destroyed c. 609 BC) contains a mass of projectile points and a burn layer aligned with the battle in which Josiah died. 2. Tel Lachish Level III shows an Egyptianized scarab and ceramic horizon dated exactly to the three‐month Egyptian occupation that followed Josiah’s fall—linking physical strata to the Jehoahaz interlude. 3. Rosette‐stamped storage‐jar handles (“royal Judean” type) cease abruptly after Level III, testifying to the turnover of royal administration—again matching the brief Jehoahaz → Jehoiakim transition. Seal Impressions and Ostraca Naming Contemporaries • The bulla “(belonging) to Eliakim, steward of Jehoiakim” (published in Israel Exploration Journal 2015) confirms Jehoiakim’s royal service immediately after Jehoahaz’s deposition. • The “Nathan‐Melech servant of the king” bulla, excavated in the City of David (2019), cites a courtier referenced in 2 Kings 23:11 in Josiah’s court, demonstrating the same bureaucratic circle operative at the close of Josiah’s reign and beginning of Jehoahaz’s. These epigraphic data show a living administrative pipeline, consistent with a sudden but historically plausible shift of monarchs. Sociopolitical Pattern: ‘People of the Land’ Extra‐biblical West Semitic texts (e.g., the Sefire Treaties, 8th c. BC) identify local landed elites (“ʿmḥʾrṣ”) empowered to ratify covenants when royal succession is threatened. The biblical phrase mirrors this legal tradition; its appearance at Jehoahaz’s accession reflects standard Near‐Eastern protocol rather than invention, reinforcing historicity. Integrated Chronology Ussher’s 609 BC date, Egypt’s regnal Year 4 of Neco II, and Babylon’s Nabopolassar Year 17 form a triple‐locked timeline. Modern astronomical calibration (eclipse of 15 June 763 BC, Assyrian limmu canon) makes the 609 BC placement immovable to within ±1 year. Cumulative Case 1. Multiple biblical authors record the same concise incident. 2. Egyptian and Babylonian state texts define the geopolitical moment assumed by the biblical writer. 3. Archaeology of Megiddo and Lachish seals that historical moment in soil. 4. Epigraphic finds pin names, titles, and offices to that exact generation. 5. Sociological and legal norms reflected are independently documented across the Ancient Near East. All strands converge precisely at the accession of Jehoahaz, yielding a historically grounded confirmation of 2 Chronicles 36:1. |
    |