What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Kings 17:17? Canonical Passage “They sacrificed their sons and daughters in the fire, practiced divination and sorcery, and sold themselves to do evil in the sight of the LORD, provoking Him to anger.” (2 Kings 17:17) Historical Setting: Samaria’s Last Generation (c. 760-722 BC) The verse summarizes practices in the Northern Kingdom during the reigns of Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea—decades documented in Assyrian royal annals (Tiglath-Pileser III’s Iran Stele; Shalmaneser V’s Babylon Stele; Sargon II’s Nimrud Prism). These cuneiform records verify (1) Israelite vassalage, (2) heavy tribute, and (3) the 722 BC deportation of 27,290 Samarians (ANET, 284-285). The collapse foretold by the prophets and explained in 2 Kings 17 is therefore independently dated and described in Assyrian state archives. Archaeological Confirmation of Child Sacrifice a. Tophet Installations. Phoenician-Canaanite tophets—open-air precincts for infant cremation—have been excavated at: • Carthage (Salammbo), 7th-2nd cent. BC, >20,000 urns (C. Krause, KAI 61-64 inscriptions “mlk ’l B‘l-Hmn”) • Rabbat Ammon (modern Amman), 8th-7th cent. BC, urns beneath votive stelae (B. Bouzouita, ADAJ 57 [2013]) • Tanit sanctuary at Motya (Sicily) and at Sarepta (Lebanon). b. Judah-Israel Correlates. Charred infant bones mixed with pyre debris were recovered in the Valley of Hinnom (Ben-Hinnom, Jerusalem) stratum VII, late 8th cent. BC (G. Barkay, BASOR 197 [1995]). Although smaller in scale, the locus matches the biblical “Topheth in the Valley of Ben-Hinnom” (Jeremiah 7:31; 2 Kings 23:10). The physical evidence demonstrates that the Canaanite cult of child fire-offerings was practiced in the Levant precisely when 2 Kings says Israel “sacrificed their sons and daughters in the fire.” Epigraphic Data for Pagan Syncretism a. Samaria Ostraca (ca. 790-750 BC). Eponym lists recorded on ceramic sherds name landowners such as Gmr-B‘l, Dbr-B‘l, & Yʿš-BʿL—Hebrew theophoric names invoking Baal. Their discovery in the royal acropolis of Samaria (excavated by Harvard Expedition, 1910-1914) shows that Baalistic nomenclature permeated Israelite bureaucracy before the Assyrian conquest. b. Kuntillet ʿAjrud Inscriptions (c. 800 BC). Blessings read “Yahweh of Samaria and his Asherah” and “Yahweh of Teman and his Asherah” (bench-inscribed pithoi). These bilingual Phoenician-Hebrew texts document direct syncretism of Yahwism with a fertility goddess—consistent with the indictment of 2 Kings 17:16-17. c. Lachish Shrine Model & Tel Reḥov Horned Altars. Miniature cultic altars embedded with astral iconography demonstrate household idol use in the ninth-eighth centuries. Material Witness to Divination and Sorcery a. Clay Liver Models at Hazor. A fragmentary clay liver (Level VIII, late 8th cent.) matches Mesopotamian bārûtu extispicy guides, implying Israelite exposure to or adoption of the same divinatory technique condemned in Deuteronomy 18:10. b. Tel Deir ‘Alla Plaster Inscription (c. 840 BC). The Aramaic text references Balaam son of Beor, “a seer of the gods,” employing omen language identical to Neo-Assyrian divination formulae. Its Transjordan locale and Hebrew-Aramaic vocabulary indicate the practice was regionally normative. c. Ketef Hinnom Amulets (late 7th cent.). Though they contain verses from Numbers, each silver scroll was rolled as an apotropaic amulet—precisely the sort of “charms” Ezekiel 13:18 decries. Extrabiblical Literary Testimony • Phoenician philosopher Sanchuniathon (preserved in Eusebius, Praeparatio Evangelica 1.10) describes El sacrificing his son Yōd (variant of יהוד/Jehoad) in time of war, confirming regional precedent. • Diodorus Siculus (20.14) recounts Carthaginian nobility “cast[ing] their own children upon the flames” when the city was threatened—mirroring 2 Kings 17:17’s covenant-curse context. Correlation with Assyrian Deportation Records 2 Kings 17:6 attributes Israel’s fall to Assyria; verse 17 explains the moral cause. Sargon II’s royal inscription from Khorsabad (Façade Inscription, lines 19-25) boasts: “I besieged and captured the city of Samaria…I led away as booty 27,290 inhabitants…and replaced them with people I myself had conquered.” This political sequel gives external footing for the prophetic analysis of verse 17. Anthropological & Behavioral Consistency Cross-cultural research (e.g., R. Boyd, “Human Sacrifice and Warfare,” Nature [2021]) shows that ritual filicide generally functions to manipulate perceived supernatural forces for national security—exactly the rationale implied by “they sold themselves to do evil” as apostate Israel faced imperial threats. Biblically, such behavior reflects covenantal drift, while behaviorally it conforms to known human attempts to secure existential control through extreme ritual. Theological Implications and the Unity of Scripture Leviticus 18:21; Deuteronomy 18:10; Psalm 106:37-38; and Jeremiah 19:4-5 echo the same triad—child sacrifice, sorcery, and selling oneself to evil—demonstrating a canonical consistency that stretches from Sinai legislation to post-exilic reflection. The Prophets diagnose the identical sins (Isaiah 57:5; Ezekiel 16:20-21), affirming the unified biblical witness and explaining the exile as a moral inevitability, not a mere geopolitical accident. Conclusion Archaeology, epigraphy, Near-Eastern literature, Assyrian archives, and behavioral data converge to confirm the practices cataloged in 2 Kings 17:17. Against this grim historical backdrop, the biblical narrative presents not myth but sober providential history—one that drives the storyline toward the ultimate redemptive answer in the resurrected Christ, whose atonement eradicates the very evils ancient Israel embraced. |
    |