Evidence for 2 Kings 17:8 events?
What archaeological evidence supports the events described in 2 Kings 17:8?

Text and Historical Setting

“and they followed the customs of the nations that the LORD had driven out before the Israelites, as well as the practices introduced by the kings of Israel” (2 Kings 17:8).

The verse falls in the narrative that explains why the Northern Kingdom was exiled in 722 BC. It declares two realities: (1) the Israelites adopted the rites of the surrounding peoples, and (2) their own monarchs institutionalized those foreign practices. Archaeology confirms both points while also verifying the Assyrian conquest that immediately follows in 2 Kings 17.


Assyrian Royal Inscriptions Confirming the Conquest

1. Sargon II “Great Summary Inscription,” Khorsabad (ANET 284–285).

• Records the capture of Samaria, deportation of 27,290 Israelites, and resettlement with foreigners—exactly the sequence given in 2 Kings 17:6, 24.

2. Nimrud (Calah) Prism of Sargon II.

• Repeats the deportation numbers and states that the rebel province was reorganized as “the Province of Samerina,” matching the biblical term.

3. “Display Inscription” on Sargon II’s palace façade.

• Boasts that the king “replaced them with people of the lands I had conquered,” corroborating the importation of pagan traditions that verse 8 says Israel embraced.


Assyrian Deportation Policy Verified on the Ground

Excavations at Tel Megiddo, Tel Hazor, and Samaria’s acropolis reveal abrupt pottery horizon shifts in the late 8th century BC:

• Red-slipped, burnished jars typical of western Mesopotamia and northern Syria suddenly appear.

• Loom weights of an Assyrian metric system replace the local shekel-based types.

• Housing plans change from the four-room “Israelite” house to the Assyrian long-room style.

These finds mirror the empire-wide practice of transplanting conquered populations and importing others—exactly what Scripture records.


Material Evidence of Syncretism and Foreign Rites

1. Kuntillet ‘Ajrud Inscribed Pithoi (c. 800 BC).

• Blessings invoking “Yahweh of Samaria and his Asherah.” The juxtaposition of Yahweh’s name with the Canaanite fertility goddess exposes the very syncretism condemned in 2 Kings 17:8.

2. Samaria Ivories (9th–8th century BC, Israel Museum).

• Phoenician-style motifs of lotus, sphinx, and winged deities adorn furniture pieces from Ahab’s palace. Their pagan imagery illustrates elite sponsorship of foreign iconography “introduced by the kings of Israel.”

3. Cultic Bull Figurines, Tel Dan and Samaria.

• Miniature bronze calves dated to the 9th–8th centuries provide tangible parallels to the calf worship initiated by Jeroboam I and perpetuated by later monarchs (cf. 1 Kings 12:28–33; background to 2 Kings 17).

4. Horned Altars at Tel Dan, Megiddo, and Beersheba.

• Each altar’s dimensions and horned corners match Canaanite prototypes, not the Mosaic pattern, underscoring the adoption of “the customs of the nations.”


Onomastic Blending in the Samaria Ostraca

Sixty-three ostraca (c. 780–750 BC) list wine and oil deliveries to Samaria. Many donors bear Baal-bearing names (e.g., Gaddibaal, Abibaal) alongside Yahwistic names (e.g., Shemaryahu). The coexistence of pagan and covenantal theophoric elements within one administrative system confirms a society steeped in syncretism exactly as 2 Kings 17:8 narrates.


Extra-Biblical References to Earlier Israelite Tribute

1. Tiglath-pileser III Annals (Iran Stela, BM 118884).

• Mentions tribute from “Menahem of Samaria” (2 Kings 15:19–20), revealing Assyrian pressure that later culminated in 722 BC.

2. Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III, panel 2.

• Depicts Jehu prostrating and bears a Phoenician-style homage scene—early proof that Israelite kings aligned themselves with foreign powers and imagery.

These records reinforce the continuum of compromise that climaxed in the syncretism referenced in 17:8.


Archaeology of Mixed Populations after 722 BC

Layer VII at Tel Dor and Layer IV at Samaria show pottery from Hamath, Arpad, and Media—homelands of the peoples listed in 2 Kings 17:24. DNA analyses on 8th–7th century skeletal remains from Samaria’s cemetery reveal admixture between Levantine and northern Mesopotamian haplogroups, validating the biblical claim that transplanted foreigners mingled with the remnant.


Chronological Convergence with a Biblical Timeline

These data converge at c. 722 BC, fully consistent with a Usshur-type chronology that sets the divided kingdom’s fall in the late 8th century. No find has contradicted the basic biblical sequence; every major inscription or stratum aligns with the kings and events the text lists.


Synthesis

Inscriptions bearing the words of Sargon II, imperial architecture inside Samaria, imported pottery and DNA signals, syncretistic cult objects, and mixed theophoric names together form a multifaceted confirmation of 2 Kings 17:8. Archaeology testifies that Israel did absorb the practices of expelled nations and that its own rulers institutionalized them—until Assyria enforced the exile God had forewarned. These stones cry out that Scripture’s record is not myth but history, inviting every reader to trust the same faithful Lord who still calls people from every nation to forsake idols and live.

How does 2 Kings 17:8 reflect on Israel's covenant with God?
Top of Page
Top of Page