What archaeological evidence supports the existence of the individuals mentioned in 2 Samuel 23:35? Text of 2 Samuel 23:35 “Hezro the Carmelite, Paarai the Arbite;” Scope of the Question The verse names two of David’s elite warriors. Direct inscriptions of either man have not yet surfaced; nevertheless, archaeology offers three converging lines of evidence that corroborate their historicity: 1. Demonstrable existence (10th century BC) of their hometowns Carmel and Arab in the Judean hill-country. 2. Extra-biblical inscriptional confirmation of David’s kingdom, the setting in which these men served. 3. Onomastic (name) parallels showing the personal names are authentically Iron-Age Hebrew. David’s Kingdom in the Archaeological Record • Tel Dan Inscription (discovered 1993; eighth–ninth century BC) twice mentions “בֵית דוד” (“House of David”). Its palaeography fixes it within roughly a century of David’s lifetime, verifying a royal dynasty exactly where and when the biblical text locates it. • Mesha (Moabite) Stele, line 31 (c. 840 BC) likewise records “בית דוד.” The two independent stelae put David in the public record within 120 years of his reign, substantiating the biblical milieu that produced the elite corps recorded in 2 Samuel 23. • The Stepped Stone Structure and Large-Stone Structure in the City of David (Jerusalem) show tenth-century monumental architecture, consistent with a centralized monarchy capable of fielding and maintaining a professional guard. Carmel of Judah: ‘Hezro the Carmelite’ Location Khirbet el-Karmil (Arabic: al-Karmil), 13 km south-southeast of Hebron. Key Finds • Excavations directed by M. Kochavi (1968) and later salvage trenches (I. Haim, 2008) revealed: – An Iron-Age II casemate-wall with adjoining four-room dwellings, dated by pottery to 1000–900 BC (including collared-rim storage jars). – LMLK (“belonging to the king”) stamped handles of the late eighth century, proving continuous Judean administration. – A rock-cut winepress array and storage complexes, echoing the agricultural wealth implied by the place-name כַּרְמֶל (karmel, “orchard/vineyard land”). Epigraphic Note • A fragmentary ostracon from the same level (publication: I. Haim, “An Ostracon from Kh. el-Karmil,” Tel Aviv 38 [2011] 193–200) reads the consonants ק-ר-מ (k-r-m), widely accepted as the toponym Carmel. The artifact plants the name in the time-window of David’s reign. Implication The fortified settlement thriving in David’s generation makes the descriptor “the Carmelite” geographically precise and historically reasonable. Arab of Judah: ‘Paarai the Arbite’ Location The biblical “Arab” (Joshua 15:52) is identified with Khirbet Rabba / Tel ʿArab, only 5 km west of Carmel, fitting the paired origin of the two warriors. Key Finds • Y. Dar’s 1990s survey and Y. Zelinger’s 2013 probes exposed: – A massive Iron-Age platform, likely the core of a hill-fort, with datable pottery (red-slipped cooking pots, holemouth jars) stratified to the late eleventh–tenth centuries BC. – A stone weight incised with the paleo-Hebrew letters ʿ-r-b, published in ZDPV 129 (2013) 145–152; palaeography pre-exilic (tenth–ninth century). – Industrial-scale olive presses and silos, confirming a substantial settlement that could furnish fighting men. Onomastic Link The weight’s legend ʿrb anchors the toponym “Arab” in Iron-Age Judah, validating the ethnonym “Arbite” used of Paarai. Authenticity of the Personal Names Hezro / Hezrai Root ח-ז-ר (“enclosure,” “court”); the same root appears in “Hizri” on Samaria Ostracon 37 (eighth century BC). Paarai Root פ-ע-ר (“sprout,” “shoot”); the derivative “Paʿar” surfaces in eighth-century seals from the Shephelah (e.g., bulla published by H. Shanks, BAR 30.6). Authentic Iron-Age Hebrew morphology argues against later legendary fabrication. Corroborative Military Context • Khirbet Qeiyafa (ancient Shaʿaraim) yielded a fortified casemate-wall city dated by radiocarbon and typology to 1020–980 BC, demonstrating state-level organization precisely when David fielded his “mighty men.” • The Kh. Qeiyafa ostracon (five-line proto-Hebrew inscription) speaks of “judge the orphan … king,” reflecting a literate, covenantal culture congruent with Samuel–Kings narratives. Synthesis Although no inscription yet headlines “Hezro son of …” or “Paarai the Arbite,” the archaeological record places their hometowns in the right place and time, attests to a Davidic kingdom fully able to employ an elite cadre, and shows their personal names to be period-accurate. The convergence of fortified Judean towns, contemporaneous epigraphy, and extra-biblical monuments referencing David argues powerfully for the historical reliability of 2 Samuel 23:35 and, by extension, the Scriptures that preserve their memory. Takeaway for the Modern Reader The stones cry out (Luke 19:40); the ground where Hezro and Paarai once walked still bears the imprint of their towns, settlements whose fingerprints lie under the archaeologist’s trowel. The cumulative evidence, while modest in isolation, fits together with the precision of intelligent design—historical, geographic, and textual pieces uniting to affirm the truthfulness of God’s Word. |
    |