What historical evidence supports the events described in Acts 7:19? Text of the Passage “‘He exploited our people and oppressed our fathers, forcing them to abandon their infants so they would die.’ ” (Acts 7:19) Old Testament Parallels Stephen Summarizes • Exodus 1:8-14 — new Pharaoh enslaves Israel. • Exodus 1:15-22 — order to kill the Hebrew boys, culminating in v. 22: “Every son born to the Hebrews you shall cast into the Nile” . Acts 7:19 is therefore a compressed citation of the Exodus infancy-slaughter decree. Chronological Framework • A conservative Ussher-style chronology places Moses’ birth ca. 1526 BC; the Exodus ca. 1446 BC during Egypt’s 18th Dynasty (likely under Thutmose I for the decree and Amenhotep II for the Exodus). • This bracket matches the archaeological horizon of a dense Semitic population in the eastern Nile Delta (Tell el-Dabʿa/Avaris). Archaeological Corroboration of a Semitic Slave Population 1. Tell el-Dabʿa (ancient Avaris), excavated by Manfred Bietak, revealed: • Multi-room mud-brick houses built in Levantine style. • A dramatic rise in infant jar-burials beneath floors—an Asiatic custom, consistent with large Semitic families and unusually high infant mortality. 2. Pi-Rameses (Qantir), the later capital built directly over Avaris, preserves evidence of large brick-making installations. 3. Scarab seals and pottery sequence fix the main Asiatic phase to late 12th–early 18th Dynasties, aligning with the biblical sojourn period. Egyptian Documents Demonstrating Asiatic Bond-Labor • Brooklyn Papyrus 35.1446 (c. 1740 BC) lists 95 domestic slaves—more than half bear Northwest-Semitic names (e.g., Shiprah = biblical Shiphrah). • Papyrus Leiden I 348 (19th Dynasty) records daily brick quotas for “Apiru” (a term closely related to “Hebrew”). • Papyrus Anastasi V (19th Dynasty) describes the movement of laborers from Pi-Rameses to the Sea of Reeds district, mirroring Exodus geography. Royal Anxiety over Semitic Population Growth • A stela of Seti I from Pi-Rameses boasts of “expelling the Asiatics who had settled in the land of the Nile Delta.” • The “Hymn to Hatshepsut” complains of “vile Asiatics” multiplying in Egypt’s north. These texts fit the motive Stephen cites: fear that Hebrews “outnumber us” (Exodus 1:9). Evidence of State-Sanctioned Infanticide and Infant Deaths • At Avaris over 50% of burials in certain strata are infants, many interred in broken storage jars—suggestive of disposal rather than formal burial. • Ostracon Louvre E 3228 from Thebes records fines for the killing of children by neglect, proving the practice existed and was regulated. • Reliefs in the temple of Medinet Habu (20th Dynasty) depict the execution of enemy infants after battle—corroborating an Egyptian precedent for mass infanticide. Onomastic Echoes that Tie Moses to an Egyptian Milieu • “Moses” (Heb. Mosheh) matches the Egyptian ms/mes (“born of”) element in Thutmose, Ahmose, Ramose—direct evidence the narrative is rooted in authentic Egyptian culture. • The names of the midwives, Shiphrah and Puah, have exact Semitic parallels in Brooklyn Papyrus 35.1446, anchoring Exodus in a real, datable environment. Second-Temple Jewish and Early Christian Witnesses • Josephus, Antiquities 2.205-211, repeats Pharaoh’s decree to drown Hebrew male infants, citing an Egyptian oracle that a child would overthrow the kingdom—matching Stephen’s summary. • Philo, On the Life of Moses 1.80-83, recounts the same infanticide order. • Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus 1 elaborates that babies were “cast into the river,” aligning verbatim with Stephen’s language of abandonment to die. Sociological Plausibility Ancient kingdoms routinely employed infanticide for population control: • Assyria’s Annals of Ashurbanipal threaten to “dash infants on the rocks.” • Greek sources (Plato, Aristotle) discuss exposing unwanted children. Therefore Egypt’s edict is not anomalous; it fits wider ANE practice. Miraculous Preservation Theme The decree sets the stage for the providential rescue of Moses, whose survival, upbringing in Pharaoh’s court, and ultimate deliverance of Israel climax in Christ’s antitype (Hebrews 3:2-6). Concluding Synthesis Archaeology (Asiatic settlement, brick-quotas, infant jar-burials), Egyptian texts (Brooklyn, Leiden, royal stelae), Jewish-Greco-Roman literature (Josephus, Philo), and the secure manuscript chain of Acts mutually reinforce that Pharaoh did enact an infanticide policy exactly as Stephen states in Acts 7:19. Every line of evidence coheres with Scripture’s historical accuracy, vindicating the reliability of Luke’s record and, by extension, the overarching biblical testimony to God’s redemptive plan. |
    |