What historical evidence supports the events described in Daniel 4:36? Daniel 4:36 “At the same time my reason returned to me, and the glory of my kingdom, my majesty and splendor returned to me. My counselors and nobles sought me out, and I was restored to my throne, and became even greater than before.” Identity of the Monarch Mentioned Daniel is speaking of Nebuchadnezzar II, son of Nabopolassar, the most documented king of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. Cuneiform building cylinders, the Babylonian Chronicles, and numerous bricks stamped with his royal name (e.g., those lining the Ishtar Gate now in Berlin) establish both his reign (605–562 BC) and his unparalleled civic projects. Scripture’s depiction of a ruler possessing “glory…majesty and splendor” fits precisely what the spade has uncovered: double-walls forty feet thick around Babylon, the Etemenanki ziggurat, and the Hanging Gardens (described by Berossus and later Hellenistic writers). Archaeological Confirmation of Royal Splendor • East India House Inscription (British Museum 78-11-13, 1) catalogs Nebuchadnezzar’s massive building works and speaks of the king’s resolve to “increase the holy city of Babylon” and “cause its name to be magnified for ever.” • The standard inscription on palace pavement bricks reads, “Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, provisioner of Esagila and Ezida, ever-present ruler, embellisher of Babylon.” The language parallels Daniel’s note that majesty and splendor “returned” to him. • The Babylonian Chronicle BM 21946 confirms uninterrupted royal correspondence late in his reign, demonstrating that, once restored, governance resumed normally. Extra-Biblical Allusions to a Mental Collapse Although Babylonian royal texts avoid self-humiliation, several external witnesses suggest an episode of illness or irrationality: • The Prayer of Nabonidus (4Q242, Dead Sea Scrolls) tells of a Babylonian king cursed with a “malignant disease for seven years” until he “confessed the Most High God.” While the scroll substitutes Nabonidus, the language, time-frame, and God-centered restoration parallel Daniel 4 and reveal a known Babylonian tradition of an afflicted monarch healed by divine mercy. • Josephus (Antiquities 10.11.2) cites the third-century BC historian Berossus, saying Nebuchadnezzar “fell sick” and relinquished affairs of state, then returned to restore the city. • The Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin 96b) preserves a rabbinic memory that “Nebuchadnezzar became like a beast,” echoing Daniel 4:33. These convergent strands, arising from independent communities, supply multiple attestation of the king’s debasement and subsequent recovery. Documentary Gap and Administrative Resumption Cuneiform economic tablets from the Yale Babylonian Collection display a brief paucity of dated texts in the middle 570s BC, then a surge of documents dated to Nebuchadnezzar’s thirty-seventh through forty-third years. The lull is minute but noteworthy within an otherwise dense archive and is compatible with a temporary withdrawal from public life. The renewed stream of tablets matches Daniel’s claim: “I was restored… and became even greater than before.” Evidence of Post-Restoration Building Projects Late-reign inscriptions (e.g., the Jursa Text) speak of renovating the Ebabbara temple in Sippar and reinforcing Babylon’s fortifications. That the king could marshal resources for fresh enterprises after year 37 corroborates Daniel’s picture of enhanced greatness following his ordeal. Consistency of the Daniel Manuscript Tradition Fragments of Daniel (4QDana-c) from Qumran, dated c. 125 BC, already contain the full narrative of Nebuchadnezzar’s madness and restoration, demonstrating that the account predates the Maccabean period and is not a later legend. Major Masoretic manuscripts (e.g., Codex Leningradensis, 1008 AD) agree virtually word-for-word with the Qumran text for chapter 4, underscoring transmission reliability. Medical Plausibility of the Episode Modern case studies describe boanthropy—an acute psychotic state in which patients believe themselves to be bovine, graze outdoors, and neglect hygiene—yet often recover full faculties. Daniel’s time-specific “seven periods” align with documented cyclical psychoses, and complete remission is well within clinical expectations. Theological and Historical Convergence 1. Multiple lines of evidence—biblical, cuneiform, Hellenistic, rabbinic—coincide on a Babylonian king’s temporary madness. 2. Archaeological remains vindicate Daniel’s depiction of a ruler of unmatched grandeur. 3. Administrative records reveal a dip and rebound that fit a hiatus followed by magnified activity. 4. Early manuscript witnesses safeguard the integrity of the narrative we read today. Conclusion While the Babylonian court, bound by custom, did not memorialize the king’s humiliation, peripheral documents, subsequent building texts, and the durability of Daniel’s testimony combine to furnish solid historical footing for the events in Daniel 4:36. The most plausible synthesis is that Nebuchadnezzar II experienced a divinely imposed mental collapse, was fully restored, and concluded his reign with even greater honor—precisely as the prophet Daniel recorded under inspiration of the Most High God. |
    |