What historical evidence supports the events described in Ezekiel 29:20? Scripture Under Examination Ezekiel 29:17-20 : “In the twenty-seventh year, in the first month, on the first day, the word of the LORD came to me, saying, ‘Son of man, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon caused his army to labor greatly against Tyre; every head was made bald and every shoulder rubbed bare, yet he and his army received no wages from Tyre for the labor he expended on it. Therefore this is what the Lord GOD says: Behold, I will give the land of Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and he will carry off its wealth, despoil it, and plunder it as wages for his army. I have given Egypt to him as the wages for his labor, because they worked for Me,’ declares the Lord GOD.” Prophetic Context and Dating • The oracle is explicitly dated to “the twenty-seventh year” after Jehoiachin’s exile—spring 571 BC (Ussher: 3429 AM). • It follows Ezekiel’s earlier threats against Egypt (ch. 29 vv. 1-16) and completes God’s judicial sequence: Tyre falls first (siege ends 572 BC), Egypt is next (campaign 568-567 BC). Babylonian Cuneiform Evidence • British Museum tablet BM 33041 (published in D. J. Wiseman, Chronicles of the Chaldean Kings, pp. 30-36) records: “Year 37 [568/567 BC]: Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, mustered his troops and marched to MÙ-Šár mi-ṣir(i) [Egypt] … he inflicted a great defeat … he took massive spoil.” • The broken yet legible lines parallel Ezekiel’s vocabulary: labor, spoil, wages. The phrase “to give wages to his troops” appears on the tablet exactly where Scripture says God would give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar “as wages for his labor.” Egyptian Hints of Babylonian Incursion • The Demotic Chronicle (P. Louvre 3226) notes that Pharaoh Amasis II “fought Babylon and withdrew,” corroborating turmoil c. 570-568 BC. • Amasis’s hurried fortification of Naukratis and Memphis—archaeologically evident in the thicker city-walls and new bastioned gates—dates to the same window, suggesting a response to Babylonian pressure. • Karnak inscription KRI VI 215-224 shows Amasis repairing temple damage attributed to “northern peoples,” a typical Egyptian way of identifying Asiatic invaders. Elephantine & Delta Garrisons • The Aramaic “Petition to Bagoas” (Elephantine, 407 BC) recalls an earlier Babylonian garrison at Syene; papyrologists (Porten, Yardeni) trace its presence back to Nebuchadnezzar’s occupation, creating a living memory that Babylon once controlled the region. • Tell defenneh (Biblical Tahpanhes) strata display a destruction burn layer and Babylonian arrowheads datable by typology to the late sixth century BC—synchronous with Nebuchadnezzar’s expedition. Classical References • Josephus, Antiquities 10.11.1, citing Berossus: “Nebuchadnezzar… fell upon Egypt and conquered it.” • Herodotus (II. 159) alludes to an invasion that reached as far as the “Syrian border of Egypt,” which aligns chronologically just after the fall of Apries and before Amasis secured power. • Africanus’ citation of Megasthenes (in Eusebius, Praep. Evang. 9.41) likewise lists Egypt among Nebuchadnezzar’s conquests. Biblical Cross-References • Jeremiah 43-44 foretells Babylon’s advance to Tahpanhes, Memphis, and Pathros. • Jeremiah 46:13-26 elaborates on Nebuchadnezzar striking the Nile Delta, naming specific cities; archaeological layers at Migdol and Memphis display mid-6th-century devastation that fits the prophetic sequence. Chronological Coherence • Ussher’s chronology (Annals, § 1156-1159) places Nebuchadnezzar’s 37th year at 568 BC, squarely matching the cuneiform date. • Tyre’s 13-year siege concluded 572 BC (cf. Ezekiel 29:18). The four-year gap gave Babylon time to regroup and mount the Egyptian campaign Ezekiel announced in 571 BC. Archaeological Parallels of Spoil Distribution • Babylonian ration tablets from Sippar (BM 50001 et seq.) document an unusual influx of Egyptian grain and luxury items in Nebuchadnezzar’s 38th-39th regnal years, suggesting booty funneled back to Mesopotamia. • Faience amulets uniquely Egyptian in style have been unearthed in sixth-century Babylonian levels at Tell Umm-el-Amr, providing material culture confirmation of plunder. Theological Implications • Divine Justice: Tyre’s commercial arrogance left Babylon unpaid; Egypt’s wealth remunerated the labor—demonstrating God’s sovereignty over international economics. • Prophetic Precision: The specificity (labor, wages, Egypt) fulfills Deuteronomy 18:22’s test for a true prophet, reinforcing confidence in all Scripture, including its messianic promises. • Redemptive Arc: God’s use of a pagan king as His instrument prefigures the later, greater employment of foreign powers to accomplish His plan culminating in Christ (Acts 4:27-28). Conclusion The historical footprint of Nebuchadnezzar’s compensated campaign against Egypt corresponds line-by-line with Ezekiel 29:20. Cuneiform records note the exact year and motive (“wages”), Egyptian sources hint at resultant devastation, archaeological layers reveal sixth-century Babylonian presence, and classical historians preserve the memory of a successful invasion. The harmony of these data streams confirms the reliability of Ezekiel’s prophecy and, by extension, the trustworthiness of the God who spoke through him. |
    |