What historical evidence supports Isaiah 44:28's prophecy about Cyrus? Text of the Prophecy (Isaiah 44:28, 45:1–4) “[I am the LORD] who says of Cyrus, ‘He is My shepherd, and he will fulfill all My purpose,’ saying of Jerusalem, ‘She will be rebuilt,’ and of the temple, ‘Let its foundations be laid.’ … Thus says the LORD to Cyrus His anointed: ‘…to subdue nations before him…to open doors so that gates will not be shut…that you may know that I, the LORD, the God of Israel, call you by name.’ ” Dating the Prophecy • Isaiah ministered during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah (Isaiah 1:1), ca. 739–686 BC. • The designation of Cyrus by name precedes Cyrus’ birth (ca. 600 BC) and conquest of Babylon (539 BC) by roughly 150–160 years. • The Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaa) from Qumran, copied c. 150–125 BC, contains the prediction verbatim, demonstrating its existence long before any post-event editorial possibility. • Septuagint (LXX) translation of Isaiah, begun c. 3rd–2nd century BC in Alexandria, likewise includes Cyrus’ name, giving a pre-Maccabean witness. • All extant Hebrew manuscripts—Masoretic Text, Dead Sea fragments, and medieval codices—agree on the wording, confirming textual stability. Historical Cyrus the Great • Founder of the Achaemenid Empire; ruled 559–530 BC. • Captured Babylon on 12 October 539 BC (Nabonidus Chronicle, BM 35382). • Instituted a policy of humane restoration of exiled peoples and their sanctuaries. Extra-Biblical Records of Cyrus’ Decree 1. Cyrus Cylinder (BM 90920, British Museum): “I returned to [their] sanctuaries… and established for them permanent sanctuaries. I also gathered all their people and returned them to their dwellings.” Though cuneiform names temples in Mesopotamia, the policy framework matches Ezra 1. 2. Babylonian Verse Account of Nabonidus: Confirms the peaceful entry of Cyrus and his favorable treatment of subject peoples. 3. Elephantine Papyri (5th cent. BC): Show Persian authorization of Jewish temple activity consistent with imperial decree practice. 4. Persepolis Fortification Tablets: Administrative ration texts (509–494 BC) demonstrating Persian sponsorship of diverse cultic workers, corroborating the empire-wide temple-restoration strategy predicted in Isaiah. Biblical Confirmation of the Decree • 2 Chronicles 36:22–23—wording of Cyrus’ edict to restore Jerusalem and the temple. • Ezra 1:1–4; 6:3–5—verbatim decree and its archival copy found at Ecbatana (Ezra 6:2), aligning with Isaiah’s temple-rebuilding clause. • Ezra 5:13–17; 6:14—prophets “Haggai and Zechariah” connect the rebuilding directly to “the command of the God of Israel and the decree of Cyrus.” Josephus’ Testimony (Antiquities XI.1.1–2) Writing in the 1st century AD, Josephus claims Cyrus read Isaiah’s prophecy shown to him by Jewish elders and, being astonished, resolved to fulfill it—a tradition independent of canonical scriptures yet reinforcing the predictive claim. Archaeological Corroboration of the Return and Rebuilding • Yehud coinage (late 6th–5th cent. BC) stamped “YHD” attests to a Persian-authorized Jewish province. • The “Cyrus-dated” seal impressions from Yavneh-Yam and Dor corroborate Persian administration in Judah. • Stratigraphic layers in Jerusalem’s City of David reveal 6th–5th cent. BC Persian-period rebuilding consistent with Nehemiah’s memoirs and Isaiah’s forecast of city restoration. Persian Imperial Policy and the Plausibility of Isaiah’s Specifics • Unlike Assyrian and Babylonian deportation policies, Persian edicts favored repatriation. Isaiah’s text pre-announces this unprecedented policy shift, naming the king and the humanitarian approach two generations before it occurred. • Gates opened “without being shut” (Isaiah 45:1) parallels Herodotus 1.191 and Xenophon, Cyropaedia 7.5, who describe Babylon’s river-gate vulnerability on the night Cyrus entered. Chronological Convergence with Ussher-Style Timeline • Creation to Flood: 4004–2348 BC. • Flood to Abraham: 2348–1996 BC. • Abraham to Exodus: 1996–1491 BC. • Exodus to Temple: 1491–1012 BC. • Isaiah’s ministry: 760–680 BC. • Cyrus’ decree: 538 BC. The prophecy-to-fulfillment gap of ~150 years fits seamlessly into a literal-historic chronology, underscoring divine orchestration rather than chance coincidence. Logical Implications for Divine Foreknowledge A named prediction, preserved unchanged across centuries, verified by independent cuneiform, Greek, Jewish, and archaeological sources, exceeds naturalistic probability. The specificity validates the biblical claim: “I am God, and there is none like Me, declaring the end from the beginning” (Isaiah 46:9–10). Summary 1. The text named Cyrus long before his birth. 2. Manuscript evidence shows the prophecy predates fulfillment. 3. Multiple extra-biblical artifacts (Cyrus Cylinder, Nabonidus Chronicle, Persian archives) confirm a decree matching Isaiah’s content. 4. Biblical books Ezra and Chronicles quote the decree in legal form. 5. Jewish, Greek, and archaeological witnesses intersect, forming a multi-strand cord of historical verification. 6. The fulfillment demonstrates the reliability of Scripture, the sovereignty of God over human history, and the reasonability of trusting the biblical record. |
    |