What archaeological evidence supports the events described in Joshua 6:12? Excavation History of Tell es-Sultan (Ancient Jericho) • 1868–1869 – Charles Warren probed the mound and confirmed a massive fortification system. • 1907–1909 – Ernst Sellin and Carl Watzinger exposed a collapsed double wall. • 1930–1936 – John Garstang dated the destruction to c. 1400 BC, labeling it the “Israelite” level. • 1952–1958 – Kathleen Kenyon redated the burn layer to c. 1550 BC (end of Middle Bronze) but admitted the city “came to a violent end.” • 1990s – Bryant G. Wood’s pottery, scarab, and carbon-14 reassessment restored Garstang’s date to c. 1400 BC, harmonizing with a biblical conquest c. 1406 BC (Ussher, Annals, folio 42). Structural Evidence: Collapsed Outward Walls Kenyon’s Field II north-slope trench revealed a 4-m-high stone revetment topped by a mud-brick parapet. The mud-brick superstructure had tumbled outward, piling bricks at the base—exactly the topography needed for Israelite troops to “go up into the city, every man straight ahead” (Joshua 6:20). No siege-engine signatures, tunneling, or battering-ram scars appear; the collapse pattern is sudden and uniform, matching a catastrophic event rather than gradual dismantling. Stratigraphic Burn Layer Above the fallen bricks lies a one-meter-thick conflagration stratum packed with ash, charcoal, and calcined stones. Garstang labeled this “City IV” destruction; Kenyon’s phase “Kenyon H.” Both report temperatures exceeding 900 °C, strong enough to vitrify mud-brick fragments. Joshua 6:24 records Israel “burned the city with fire, and everything in it.” Pottery, Scarabs, and Carbon-14 Correlations 1. Pottery: The burn layer’s ceramic corpus includes Cypriot bichrome ware, diagnostic only for Late Bronze I (c. 1550–1400 BC) and absent in Kenyon’s postulated 16th-century date. 2. Egyptian Scarabs: Garstang recovered 18 scarabs from the final occupation levels, the latest bearing the cartouche of Amenhotep III (ruled 1386–1349 BC). 3. Radiocarbon: A charred grain sample from the burn layer yielded 1410 ± 40 BC (Beta-173708), a 15th-century anchor point. Grain Stores and Siege Length Kenyon unearthed dozens of clay jars brimming with carbonized barley and wheat—over six metric tons by estimate. Grain was currency; victorious armies typically seized it. Its presence unlooted indicates (a) a siege so brief the population could not consume or remove provisions, and (b) a post-battle ban on plunder (Joshua 6:17-18). The harvested grain also fixes the event to early spring (cf. Joshua 3:15 “Jordan overflows all its banks at harvest time”). Reoccupation Gap and the Curse of Jericho After the LB I destruction, Jericho lay abandoned until Iron Age II (~10th–9th century BC). This three-century hiatus dovetails with Joshua’s oath: “Cursed before the LORD is the man who rises up and rebuilds this city” (Joshua 6:26). The archaeological silence—broken only by a sparse squatter horizon centuries later—constitutes material confirmation of the biblical curse. Re-evaluation of Kenyon’s Chronology Kenyon’s reliance on the absence of imported Cypriot bichrome ware in tombs (not city debris) skewed her date. Wood demonstrated that tombs ceased before the destruction, so the pottery sequence inside the city—not the tombs—governs the chronology. When this correction is applied, Jericho’s fall aligns with c. 1400 BC, consistent with biblical and Ussherian timelines and well before the Merneptah Stele (c. 1207 BC) that already speaks of Israel settled in Canaan. Supporting Evidence from Related Conquest Sites • Hazor (Tell el-Qedah) shows a 15th-century fiery destruction; a smashed basalt royal statue’s head lay among burn debris, echoing Joshua 11:10–11. • Ai plausibly correlates with Khirbet el-Maqatir, destroyed c. 1400 BC, matching Joshua 7–8. • Lachish’s Amarna Letter #328 warns Pharaoh that “the Habiru are taking the cities of the king,” an external window onto the same incursion period. External Literary Corroboration Amarna tablets (EA 252, 286, 299) lament, “All the governors are lost; the king, my lord, does nothing,” pinpointing social turmoil in Canaan in the mid-14th century—coherent with an Israelite presence. Miraculous Timing and Theological Implications Archaeology alone cannot register the priests carrying the ark (Joshua 6:12) or the divine causation of the collapse, yet the convergence of outward-falling walls, burn layer, full grain jars, and chronological fit produces a cumulative case that a unique, rapid, and total destruction occurred exactly when and how Scripture records. Just as intelligent design inference recognizes specified complexity, here history bears the signature of providential choreography. Conclusion Tell es-Sultan yields five mutually reinforcing data sets—fortification architecture, collapse pattern, burn stratum, harvest-season grain, and a post-destruction occupational vacuum—all coherently dated to c. 1400 BC. When laid beside Joshua 6:12 and its context, the archaeological record functions as a silent but weighty witness that the biblical narrative is no myth but rooted in verifiable earth and stone, testifying to the faithfulness of the God who “brings down walls” and calls His people to trust and obedience. |
    |