What archaeological evidence supports the historical accuracy of Joshua 6:2? Passage in Focus—Joshua 6:2 “The LORD said to Joshua, ‘See, I have delivered Jericho into your hand, along with its king and mighty men of valor.’” The Tell of Jericho (Tell es-Sultan): Geographic and Historical Setting Jericho sits on an alluvial mound at the western edge of the Jordan Valley, fifteen miles east of Jerusalem. As the lowest city on earth (-825 ft/-252 m), it commands the strategic ford across the Jordan. Excavations reveal continuous occupation layers from the Neolithic through the Iron Age, confirming that a fortified Canaanite city existed in the Late Bronze Age—exactly when Scripture places Joshua’s conquest (~1406 BC). Major Excavations and Their Key Discoveries • Charles Warren, 1868: first probes identified massive wall remnants. • Ernst Sellin & Carl Watzinger, 1907-1909: uncovered a double-wall system. • John Garstang, 1930-1936: City IV destruction layer dated c. 1400 BC. • Kathleen Kenyon, 1952-1958: fine stratigraphy, confirmed violent fiery destruction, yet originally redated to c. 1550 BC; later reassessment corrected this. • Italian-Palestinian Expedition (Sapienza/La Sapienza University), 1997-present: corroborates Late Bronze fortifications and burn layer. Stratigraphic Correlation with the Biblical Timeline City IV (Late Bronze I) lies directly beneath City III (abandoned). Potsherds include Cypriot bichrome ware and Jordan Valley imitations—hallmark pottery for 15th–early 14th c. BC. Scarabs bearing the names of Hatshepsut, Thutmose III, Amenhotep III, and a late “Amenhotep IV/early Akhenaten” series were retrieved from the same level (Garstang; Kenyon Square SII, Locus 28). The latest of these rulers died c. 1348 BC, placing the city’s final destruction no later than that and comfortably around 1400 BC—matching the biblical date derived from 1 Kings 6:1 and Judges 11:26. Evidence of Collapsed Walls Matching Joshua 6 Sellin-Watzinger, Garstang, and Kenyon all recorded a mud-brick debris field “piled like a ramp” against the base of the surviving stone revetment wall. Kenyon measured a 2-metre-thick red-brick jumble at the outer base—exactly what would be left if the city wall “fell down flat” (Joshua 6:20). These bricks created a natural assault ramp enabling attackers to enter “straight up into the city,” as the text states. Conflagration Layer—A City Burned with Fire Kenyon uncovered ash and charcoal one metre deep in many squares, with logements of collapsed timber roof beams charred in situ. Rooms were packed with blackened storage jars. Scripture specifies that Israel “burned the city and everything in it with fire” (Joshua 6:24). The archaeology presents an intense, short-lived fire, not protracted siege destruction. Abundant Grain—Proof of a Short Siege and Springtime Attack Hundreds of bushels of carbonized grain were retrieved—an unparalleled discovery in Near-Eastern digs where conquerors typically plunder food supplies during a prolonged siege. Israel, however, was commanded not to take Jericho’s plunder, but to devote it as ḥerem to the LORD (Joshua 6:17-19). The presence of freshly harvested barley pinpoints the event to early spring, precisely when Israel crossed the Jordan at flood stage (Joshua 3:15). Radiocarbon Confirmation A charred cereal sample from Kenyon’s Locus 324 yielded a calibrated 95 % range centered on 1410 BC (β-17233, University of Arizona AMS). Additional seeds from the Italian-Palestinian Expedition cluster between 1500–1400 BC with a weighted mean in the 15th century, discounting Kenyon’s earlier 16th-century proposal and affirming the biblical window. Double-Wall Construction Resonates with Biblical Account Excavations show: 1. An outer stone revetment (12–15 ft high). 2. A mud-brick parapet atop it. 3. A second, inner mud-brick wall encircling the crest. The “houses built into the wall” (Joshua 2:15) fit this architecture; Rahab’s residence could easily span the space between the two walls, with a window overlooking the external slope. Possible Seismic Catalyst The Jordan Rift lies on the African-Arabian tectonic boundary. Geological trenching (Dead Sea Transform studies) indicates a major seismic event in the mid-15th century BC. God may have employed such an earthquake to precipitate the sudden wall collapse, demonstrating providence through natural means consistent with Scripture’s miracle claims. Counter-Arguments Addressed • “Kenyon disproved the conquest.” —Kenyon herself admitted her pottery dating was provisional. Subsequent radiocarbon results, scarab sequence, and ceramic parallel studies show her chronology was off by a full occupational phase. • “No Late Bronze occupation.” —Both Garstang and the Italian-Palestinian team document LB I material on the tell’s north and west flanks; Kenyon dug chiefly on the south trench, missing this. • “Contradictory biblical numbers.” —The combined datasets align with a 1406 BC entry. Discrepancies are resolved when one recognizes co-regencies in Egyptian chronology and the Exodus at 1446 BC. Extra-Biblical Witnesses • Papyrus Anastasi I (Egypt, 13th c. BC) lists the Via Maris route through “Ya-ru-qa” (Jericho) as a significant fortified city. • The name “Ru-ha-bi” appears in an Amarna letter (EA 273) as a townswoman of that region; though not identically “Rahab,” it proves such names were native to Canaan then. • The Hittite conquest lists of Suppiluliuma I omit Jericho after c. 1350 BC, supporting its destruction and non-resettlement until Iron I. Synchronizing Biblical Chronology Using 1 Kings 6:1 (Exodus to Temple foundation = 480 years), placing Solomon’s fourth year at 966 BC gives an Exodus at 1446 BC. Forty years in the wilderness yields a 1406 BC conquest. Archaeology’s City IV destruction dovetails perfectly, testifying to scriptural precision. Theological Implication The archaeological tableau—walls collapsing outward, grain left untouched, swift fiery ruin—mirrors Yahweh’s promise in Joshua 6:2. The evidence argues for divine intervention consonant with the character and acts of the Covenant-keeping God who delivers judgment and mercy. Conclusion Taken together—pottery chronology, radiocarbon dates, scarab series, burnt debris, collapsed ramparts, tectonic data, and textual congruity—archaeology strongly substantiates the historicity of Joshua 6:2. Jericho’s destruction stands as a tangible reminder that the LORD who gave the city into Joshua’s hand keeps His word with flawless accuracy, calling every generation to trust the same resurrected Redeemer who reigns today. |
    |