What historical evidence exists for the events described in Matthew 28:4? Scripture Text Matthew 28:4 “The guards trembled in fear of him and became like dead men.” Immediate Narrative Context Matthew alone records a detail absent from the other Gospels: an officially posted guard (προνομεῖς) at the sealed tomb (27:62-66). When the angel descends, an earthquake occurs (28:2), the stone is rolled away, and the soldiers collapse in terror. The entire pericope centers on demonstrating that the tomb was under lethal surveillance, was nevertheless empty, and that the first eyewitness proclamation came from the women rather than the guards. Roman and Temple Guard Protocols 1. Roman military manuals (e.g., Vegetius, Epitoma Rei Militaris 3.8) prescribe capital punishment for a sentry who deserts or sleeps. 2. Josephus (War 6.302-303) confirms that the Temple guard followed similar standards. 3. Acts 12:18-19 and 16:27 indicate that first-century guards faced execution for an escaped prisoner, illustrating the enormity of the risk the guard at Jesus’ tomb would have shouldered. The historical impossibility of a voluntary dereliction of duty strengthens the sober realism of Matthew’s report that the soldiers “became like dead men”; they were incapacitated, not negligent. Multiple Independent Lines of Gospel Testimony • Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John unanimously declare the tomb empty on the third day. • Matthew’s guard episode can be correlated with Mark’s emphasis on the “very large stone” (Mark 16:4) and John’s notation of the linen wrappings left behind (John 20:5-7); both motifs presuppose that no human conspirator moved the body. • Matthew’s narrative of bribed soldiers (28:11-15) explains why the guard’s first-hand experience never became a public denial of the resurrection. Hostile Jewish Polemic as Early Enemy Attestation 1. Matthew 28:15: “this account has been spread among the Jews to this very day.” A core criterion of historicity is “enemy attestation”; the evangelist records what his opponents themselves were saying. 2. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho 108 (c. A.D. 150) attests that the Jewish leadership was still circulating the theft explanation. 3. Tertullian, De Spectaculis 30 (c. A.D. 200) echoes the same charge. 4. The medieval Toledot Yeshu preserves the stolen-body claim in later rabbinic folklore, showing its deep roots. For the polemic to exist, the tomb had to be empty; otherwise producing a corpse would have silenced the nascent church. Patristic Witness to the Guard Tradition • Ignatius of Antioch (Smyrnaeans 1-2, c. A.D. 110) stresses that “those who guarded Him” saw the stone rolled away. • The Gospel of Peter (2nd cent.) independently repeats the theme of soldiers at the tomb overwhelmed by supernatural power, illustrating early, widespread circulation of the motif. These writings are geographically diverse (Antioch, Syria, Egypt) and show the guard tradition was neither late nor localized. Archaeological and Epigraphic Corroboration • The “Nazareth Inscription” (Imperial edict against tomb violation, c. A.D. 40–50) imposes capital punishment for removing corpses from sealed tombs. Many scholars connect its promulgation to reports emanating from Judea that a body had disappeared from a sealed grave. • First-century rolling-stone tombs identical to the Gospel description have been excavated at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and elsewhere around Jerusalem, demonstrating the practicality of the “very large stone” detail (Mark 16:4). • Military diplomas and reliefs (e.g., the Dura-Europos graffiti) illustrate Roman sentries equipped exactly as envisioned in Matthew’s account. Criterion of Embarrassment The admission that Roman (or Temple) soldiers—symbols of masculine power—collapsed while women remained conscious creates an embarrassing reversal that writers inventing propaganda would normally avoid. This strengthens the claim that Matthew is recording events, not composing edifying fiction. Psychological Plausibility of the Soldiers’ Reaction • Behavioral science records the “Tonic Immobility” response—humans can enter a temporary catatonic state when faced with overpowering fear. • First-century soldiers, though hardened, had no framework for encountering an angelic being accompanied by an earthquake; Matthew’s succinct note captures an authentic fight-or-freeze reaction consistent with modern trauma research. Early Creedal Confirmation of a Supernatural Event The pre-Pauline creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 (formulated within five years of Calvary) affirms the bodily resurrection, implicitly presupposing an empty tomb—events the guard episode helps explain. Philosophical and Theological Coherence Matthew integrates the guard account to demonstrate divine vindication of the Son, the impotence of earthly power against God’s purposes, and the fulfillment of Psalm 2: “He who sits in the heavens laughs.” Historically, the soldiers’ paralysis functions as an enacted parable: even Rome’s elite fall prostrate before Yahweh’s messenger. Cumulative Historical Probability 1. Early, multiple, and independent attestations of the empty tomb. 2. Hostile corroboration from Jewish polemic. 3. Archaeological evidence of sealed tombs and imperial concern over corpse theft. 4. Uncontested textual transmission. 5. Behavioral realism of soldier response. Together these strands form a historically credible tapestry supporting Matthew 28:4: real guards really collapsed before a real angel at a real empty tomb—events that ignited the proclamation of the risen Christ. |
    |