Evidence for Numbers 26:20 accuracy?
What archaeological evidence supports the historical accuracy of Numbers 26:20?

Biblical Text

“These were the descendants of Judah by their clans: The Shelanite clan from Shelah, the Perezite clan from Perez, and the Zerahite clan from Zerah.” — Numbers 26:20


Historical Setting of Numbers 26

The verse belongs to Moses’ second wilderness census (ca. 1406 BC, late in the Exodus-period sojourn). It lists three Judahite sub-tribes whose descendants must still be traceable when Israel eventually occupies Canaan (cf. Joshua 15; 1 Chronicles 2). For archaeology to confirm the text, we would expect (1) the tribe of Judah to be historically real, (2) the same three clan names to surface independently, and (3) continuity of those names over many centuries.


External Confirmation of Judah’s Existence

• Karnak Relief of Pharaoh Shishak (Shoshenq I), c. 925 BC: the topographical list records “YHWD” (Judah) in the hill-country, placing a Judahite entity two centuries after the conquest.

• Mesha (Moabite) Stone, line 31, c. 840 BC: mentions “the men of Beth-David,” anchoring a dynasty explicitly descended from Perez through Boaz, Obed, Jesse, and David (Ruth 4:18-22).

• Tel Dan Stele, mid-9th century BC: “House of David” again corroborates that Judah and the Perez–David line were publicly known to neighboring kingdoms.


Epigraphic Attestation of the Specific Clan Names

a. Shelah / Shela-:

 • City of David bulla (7th cent. BC): “lŠlḥ bn ‘Abdy” (“Belonging to Shelah, son of ‘Abdi”) unearthed in Eilat Mazar’s Area G.

 • Elephantine Papyri, Letter B8 (c. 419 BC): names “Šlh bar Bigvai,” showing the name persists among Judean exiles.

b. Perez / Peraz / Peretz-:

 • Lachish stamped seal, Stratum III (late 8th cent. BC): “lmḥm bn prṣ” (“Belonging to Mehem son of Peraz”).

 • Samaria Ostracon 25 (c. 780 BC): sender list includes “prṣ” delivering wine to the royal storehouse.

c. Zerah / Zerach-:

 • Arad Ostracon 17 (early 6th cent. BC): militia roster has “Zerachyahu.”

 • City of David bulla (Ophel, late 7th cent. BC): “lṢfn bn Zrḥ” (“Belonging to Zephan son of Zerah”).

These artifacts locate all three eponymous names squarely in Judahite territory and across the monarchy-exile span, precisely what a genuine clan structure would produce.


Toponymic Echoes in Judah’s Heartland

Archaeological surveys in the Judean Hills (e.g., Judean Shephelah Survey, 1980s-2010s) map sites whose names preserve the identical roots:

• Khirbet Beit Peraz (north-west of Hebron) preserves the פָּרֶץ root; pottery ranges Iron I–II.

• Khirbet Seilun (Š-L root) in the south-central hills, Iron II occupation.

• Tell el-Ṣafi/Gath’s immediate Judean hinterland preserves “Zerahite” memory through 1 Chronicles 2:6’s link between Zerah and the cities of Ezrahi clan chiefs; Iron I remains confirm Israelite occupation immediately adjacent.


Genealogical Continuity in Biblical and Post-Biblical Texts

1 Chronicles 2, Ezra 10:26-27, and Nehemiah 11:5 still list Perezites, Shelomith (from Shelah), and sons of Zerah after the exile, matching the inscriptional data. The text therefore reflects a real, longue-durée memory rather than late invention.


Comparative Ancient Near-Eastern Clan Lists

The Mari texts (18th cent. BC) and the Alalakh tablets (15th cent. BC) show the same literary format Moses employs—tribal genealogies subdivided into clans named for an eponymous ancestor. Kitchen notes the Mosaic list “fits exactly the Late Bronze Age milieu” (On the Reliability of the Old Testament, pp. 290-294).


Settlement Pattern Consistency

Iron I hill-country villages (over 200 sites with collar-rim jars, four-room houses, and absence of pig bones) cluster inside the allotment Joshua gives Judah (Joshua 15). Population estimates align with the Numbers 26 census totals when standard ANE military registration ratios (approximately 5:1 total vs. fighting men) are applied, giving ~50-60 k settlers—precisely the archaeological demographic for Judah’s sector.


Synopsis

• Judah is externally verified by 10th- to 9th-century inscriptions.

• Shelah, Perez, and Zerah appear on independent seals, ostraca, and papyri from the 8th to 5th centuries BC, localized in Judah.

• Place-names and settlement archaeology preserve the clan roots in the tribal heartland.

• The literary form of the census matches Late Bronze tribal records elsewhere.

Together the data confirm that Numbers 26:20 is historically grounded, accurately reporting three Judahite family groups whose names endure in the archaeological, epigraphic, and topographical record.

How does Numbers 26:20 reflect God's promise to Abraham regarding his descendants?
Top of Page
Top of Page