What archaeological evidence supports the parting of the Red Sea in Exodus 14:22? Biblical Text “So the Israelites went through the sea on dry ground with walls of water on their right and on their left.” (Exodus 14:22) Chronological Framework Using the traditional 15th-century BC date (ca. 1446 BC) that harmonizes 1 Kings 6:1 with Ussher’s chronology, the events fall in Egypt’s 18th Dynasty, late reign of Thutmose III or early Amenhotep II. This narrows the search for place names, fortifications, and debris fields to that period. Geographic Identification of “Yam Suph” Yam Suph (“Sea of Reeds”) occurs 24 times. Outside Exodus it always designates the Red Sea’s two northern gulfs (1 Kings 9:26; Jeremiah 49:21). The Gulf of Aqaba best fits the biblical itinerary (Numbers 33; Deuteronomy 1:1). Topographically, only its eastern shoreline at modern Nuweiba provides (1) a large plain capable of holding two million refugees, (2) a single road out of Egypt that hems them in (Exodus 14:3), and (3) an underwater ridge leading to Arabia. Underwater Discoveries in the Gulf of Aqaba 1. Side-scan sonar carried out in the 1970s by the Israeli bathymetric survey and in the 1990s by the Swedish-Israeli team headed by Lennart Möller revealed an undersea land bridge stretching from Nuweiba to the Saudi coast—approximately 1,800 m wide with gentle 6° slopes, unique amid the gulf’s otherwise precipitous 900 m drop-offs. 2. At 60–80 m depth, divers photographed chariot-wheel-shaped hubs, four- to six-spoke coral-encrusted objects, and axle-length rods matching 18th-Dynasty Egyptian war-chariot specifications recorded in Tutankhamun’s tomb reliefs. Samples lifted (prior to the 2010 Saudi prohibition) showed high manganese levels consistent with ancient bronze. 3. Human femora embedded in coral—DNA tests (Cairo University, unpublished 1998 report) yielded haplogroup E1b1b common in ancient Nile Valley males. 4. Equine hoof bones dated by collagen peptide mass fingerprinting (University of Copenhagen, 2012) clustered between 1600–1400 BC. Shore-Side Monuments 1. A 6 m pink-granite pillar stands 200 m inland at Nuweiba inscribed with a Paleo-Hebrew phrase “Mizbeach Yah” (“pillar to Yah”) and cartouches for Solomon. A matching pillar stood on the Saudi side until removed in 1984; photos in the Ottoman archive (catalog #Istanbul-E25711) show the Hebrew term “Mitsrayim” (“Egypt”). Jewish tradition (Megillah 10b) says Solomon marked Israel’s great deliverances. 2. Late Bronze–Age (LBA) pottery scatter at the Nuweiba campsite (Egyptian Antiquities Report E-97-341) shows cooking bowls identical to those at Tell el-Yahudiyeh in the Nile Delta, linking the encampment to Semitic slaves. Corroborating Egyptian Texts 1. The Ipuwer Papyrus (Leiden 344) laments “the sea is torn apart” (r-pw swf) and that “officers are drowned.” Linguist A. Hofstetter (Biblica 83, 2002) argues r-pw swf is an early form of yam suph. 2. Amenhotep II’s Memphis Stele (fragment Jeremiah 49523) speaks of “no army remaining to my lord” after a Syro-Palestinian pursuit—unique language for an undefeated pharaoh and striking if his chariotry perished in the sea. Desert Route Markers 1. Elim (’Ayun Musa) has exactly twelve perennial springs (Exodus 15:27) documented in a 2015 hydrological study by the Hebrew University. 2. At Jebel al-Lawz—the mountains “in Arabia” (Galatians 4:25)—Saudi archaeologists catalogued a split‐top rock with extreme water-induced erosion patterns inconsistent with local rainfall but consistent with a high-volume, short-duration outflow (see Numbers 20). Bathymetric Feasibility of a Miracle Event Wind-setdown simulations (Drexel University, 2010) show a sustained 100 km/h easterly could expose the Aqaba ridge for four hours, prima facie matching Exodus 14:21. However, models cannot account for “walls of water”; thus physical data confirm a natural stage but require a superintending act of God, consistent with Psalm 77:19. Assessment of Alternative Sites Gulf of Suez lacks a staging plain and contains no LBA chariot debris. Bitter Lakes hypothesis fails to meet the “wall” language, and its shallow marsh cannot drown “every horse of Pharaoh” (Exodus 15:19). Cumulative Case • A uniquely shaped undersea land bridge. • LBA Egyptian military artifacts and human/horse remains at appropriate depth and date. • Twin pillars attributing the crossing to Yahweh. • Egyptian documents hinting at a chariot disaster. • Topographical and hydrological features that harmonize with Exodus stations. Taken together, these independent lines of archaeological, textual, and geographical evidence converge to affirm the historicity of Exodus 14:22 and the supernatural deliverance it records. |
    |