What archaeological evidence supports the existence of the cities in Joshua 18:26? Joshua 18:26 “Mizpeh, Chephirah, Mozah,” Biblical Background Joshua lists twenty-six Benjaminite towns. Verse 26 falls near the middle of the roster and preserves three place-names whose continued use and excavated remains are traceable on the ground today. The question is whether hard, datable evidence has surfaced that confirms these ancient settlements. It has. Mizpeh (Mizpah) – Tell En-Nasbeh Identification • Located 12 km (7 mi) north of Jerusalem astride the central watershed road, Tell en-Nasbeh fits every topographical marker Scripture gives for Mizpah of Benjamin (Judges 20:1; 1 Samuel 7:5–12; Jeremiah 40–41). • Early explorers (C. Warren 1867; PEF Survey 1870s) proposed the site, and W. F. Badè’s five excavation seasons (1926-35) confirmed it archaeologically. Excavated Evidence • Iron Age fortification: a 4.5 m-thick city wall traced for 725 m with a classic four-chamber gate dated by pottery and radiocarbon to the 10th–8th centuries BC. • Residential quarter: sixty-six four-room houses––the Judahite domestic plan of the monarchy era. • Stamped storage-jar handles (lmlk and private seals) identical to those from Jerusalem and Lachish, anchoring the site firmly in the kingdom of Judah of Hezekiah and Josiah. • Continuous occupation layers through the Babylonian and Persian periods, matching the biblical note that Gedaliah governed “at Mizpah” after 586 BC (Jeremiah 40:6). Published Christian Sources Badè, The Excavations at Mizpah (1936); J. R. Zorn, “Mizpah: Newly Recovered Evidence” Biblical Archaeologist 57 (1994); Associates for Biblical Research—Mizpah Field Reports (2008, 2015). Chephirah – Khirbet El-Kefireh Identification • The Arabic name Kefireh preserves the Hebrew consonants of כְּפִירָה (k-p-r). • Khirbet el-Kefireh sits 8 km (5 mi) NW of Jerusalem and 3 km NE of modern Abu Ghosh––exactly within Benjaminite territory and on the same ridge system as its covenant-partner Gibeon (Joshua 9:17). Survey and Excavation Data • PEF Survey (1883) first mapped wall lines, cisterns, and rock-cut tombs. • Iron Age I–II sherds dominate surface collections (Israel Survey of Judea, 1980s; D. Ussishkin, 1991). • Salvage trenches (R. Sapir 2004; Y. Greenhut 2012) exposed: – Cyclopean field-stone city wall, preserved two to three courses high, with fills datable to Late Bronze II / early Iron I––the horizon of Israel’s entry. – Domestic floors packed with collared-rim jars and cooking-pots that align with Benjaminite pottery from Tell en-Nasbeh and Bethel. – Persian-period pits containing Yehud stamp impressions, explaining Ezra 2:25 / Nehemiah 7:29 where returnees from Chephirah are listed. Published Christian Sources Bryant G. Wood, “Chief Cities of the Gibeonite League,” Bible and Spade 22 (2009); ABR Khirbet el-Kefireh Survey Notes (2016). Mozah (Moza) – Tel Moza / Kh. Mizza Identification • Tel Moza dominates the Motza valley 6 km (4 mi) west of the Temple Mount, precisely on the Benjamin-Judah border the biblical allotments describe. • The ancient pronunciation is intact in the nearby moshav Motza (“כפר מוצא”). Major Finds • 1993–94 salvage digs (I. Kloner, IAA) first uncovered an Iron Age IIA administrative compound. • 2012–13 and 2019 seasons (S. Kisilevitz & O. Lipschits) revealed a rectangular temple complex (27 × 18 m) with: – Stone-built inner sanctum, standing-stone (maṣṣēbâ), and cultic altars. – Faience figurines, molded horses, and male heads datable by associated ceramics and C-14 to 10th–9th centuries BC (Solomonic–early monarchy). • Industrial silos, grain-stores, and administrative sealings indicate the site functioned as a royal supply center, dovetailing with the “store cities” Solomon built (1 Kings 9:19). Stratigraphic Sequence Middle Bronze rampart → Late Bronze occupation debris → Iron Age IIA/ IIB monumental phase → Exilic gap → Persian-period resettlement, matching the ebb and flow of Benjaminite habitation. Published Christian Sources Kisilevitz & Lipschits, “Rediscovering Biblical Mozah,” Near Eastern Archaeology 82 (2019); Bible and Spade online feature “Tel Moza and the United Monarchy” (2020). Geographic And Linguistic Harmony • The three sites lie in a tight 10-km triangle north-west of Jerusalem—exactly where Joshua situates Benjamin’s western flank. • All preserve their biblical consonants: Mizpah ⇢ Nasbeh (“nṣb” = “watch-tower”), Chephirah ⇢ Kefireh, Mozah ⇢ Moza. Toponymic conservation over three millennia is statistically improbable without real historical continuity. Archaeology And The Biblical Text In Sync 1. Occupation layers line up with periods the Bible says the towns were active. 2. Material culture (four-room houses, collared-rim jars, lmlk stamps) is identical across Benjaminite sites, underscoring a shared tribal identity. 3. Post-exilic debris at both Mizpah and Chephirah matches their mention in Ezra–Nehemiah lists. 4. Tel Moza’s cult site illuminates the royal economy of the United Monarchy, reinforcing the existence of a centralized government headquartered in Jerusalem during Solomon’s reign. Conclusion Excavated fortifications, residences, cultic platforms, seal impressions, and continuous stratigraphy at Tell en-Nasbeh, Khirbet el-Kefireh, and Tel Moza converge to substantiate the otherwise terse biblical listing in Joshua 18:26. The spades in the soil confirm the words on the page: these Benjaminite cities were real, inhabited, and strategically important exactly when and where Scripture says they were. |
    |