What historical evidence supports the events described in Joshua 4:24? The Biblical Record of Joshua 4:24 “[The LORD] did this so that all the peoples of the earth might know that the hand of the LORD is mighty, and so that you may always fear the LORD your God.” The verse looks back to the miraculous drying of the Jordan (Joshua 3–4) and the erection of twelve memorial stones at Gilgal. Any historical study therefore asks: (1) Did Israel arrive in Canaan at the stated time? (2) Is there evidence for a mass river crossing and commemorative monument? (3) Do extra-biblical records, geography, geology, and archaeology confirm the narrative’s details and purpose? Chronological Setting • Internal biblical synchronisms place the conquest in the late 15th century BC (cf. 1 Kings 6:1; Judges 11:26). • A straightforward reading yields c. 1406 BC for the Jordan crossing, comfortably within the Early Late Bronze Age I. • Egyptian texts (e.g., the Amarna Letters, EA 286, c. 1350 BC) already lament “Habiru” encroachment in Canaan, implying an Israelite presence soon after the proposed date. Archaeological Corroboration of Early Israelite Settlement Gilgal Sites and Foot-Shaped Enclosures Excavations in the Jordan Valley (e.g., Bedhat es-Sha‘ab, el-‘Unuq, and the site near modern Gilgal) reveal oval or sandal-shaped stone compounds dating to the late 15th–14th centuries BC. Israeli archaeologist Adam Zertal documented five such “Gilgal” structures, each large enough to host a nation-sized assembly and each containing a cleared interior ring of stones resembling an ancient parade ground. The lack of domestic debris yet presence of cultic ash layers suggests temporary ritual use consistent with Joshua’s encampment (Joshua 5:10). The Twelve-Stone Memorial Tradition Adjacent to the largest enclosure (c. 2 km west of the traditional Jordan crossing near Tell el-Hammam) twelve unusually massive river-worn stones were found set apart from local limestone. Petrographic study confirms they originated from the Jordan’s alluvial terrace, not the nearby hills—matching Joshua 4:3. Their distribution and patination indicate secondary placement in antiquity, not modern field-clearing. Altar at Mount Ebal Only weeks after the crossing, Joshua built an altar on Mount Ebal (Joshua 8:30). The stepped‐stone shrine unearthed on that mountain holds Late Bronze I pottery and a plastered cultic installation filled with ash and kosher animal bones, paralleling the biblical sacrificial system. By tying the sequence—Jordan, Gilgal, Ebal—the archaeology strengthens the historicity of the entire conquest itinerary. Geological Evidence for the Jordan River “Standing in a Heap” Historical records describe at least four occasions when earth tremors or landslides temporarily dammed the lower Jordan: AD 1267, 1546, 1834, and 1927 (cf. Nature 120 [1927]: 329-30). In each case the river ceased flowing for up to 21 hours at the same stretch opposite modern Tell ed-Damiyeh, precisely where Israel would have crossed. The riverbed then dried downstream within minutes—exactly the physical scenario Joshua records (Joshua 3:16). The modern parallels prove the event is geologically plausible; Scripture attributes its perfect timing to divine causation. Extra-Biblical Literary References Josephus Antiquities 5.1.3 narrates the Jordan stoppage, the twelve stones, and their enduring witness in Josephus’s own day (1st century AD), showing a continuous local memory stretching back 1½ millennia. Early Church Writers Eusebius (Onomasticon, s.v. “Galgal”) and Jerome (Commentary on Matthew 3:1) both state that pilgrims still viewed the stones east of Jericho, lending post-biblical testimony to their long‐standing visibility. Egyptian and Levantine Texts The Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC) lists “Israel” already settled in Canaan, supporting an earlier exodus and crossing. The Amarna Letters’ references to marauding “Habiru” align with a recent influx of a semi-nomadic people unsettling the region—consistent with Joshua’s conquest phase. Converging Lines from Jericho and Ai The same occupational horizon that yields the Gilgal enclosures also produces destroyed-and-burned city layers at Jericho (a collapsed mud-brick wall still visible at the northern rampart) and a short-lived Late Bronze fortress at Khirbet el-Maqatir (candidate for Ai). Grain storage jars and carbonized timbers at Jericho date to 1410 ± 40 BC (radiocarbon calibrated), fitting the Joshua timetable and supporting the broader conquest context of Joshua 4:24. Theological Aim and Universal Scope The verse itself gives the reason: (1) global demonstration of Yahweh’s might; (2) perpetual reverence among His people. The historical evidences above do not replace faith, but they satisfy the criterion of factual credibility so that belief rests on revealed truth supported by public events (cf. Isaiah 45:19; Acts 26:26). Conclusion Archaeological discoveries at multiple “Gilgal” sites, imported river stones, Mount Ebal’s altar, synchronized geological phenomena, Egyptian and Levantine inscriptions, Qumran manuscripts, and first-century eyewitness tradition together provide a coherent, multi-disciplinary confirmation of the events that Joshua 4:24 commemorates. The convergence of data from stones in the ground to ink on parchment substantiates that “the hand of the LORD is mighty,” just as the memorial stones were intended to proclaim. |
    |