What historical evidence supports the existence of the kings mentioned in Isaiah 37:13? Text and Immediate Context “Where is the king of Hamath, the king of Arpad, the king of the city of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivvah?” The verse occurs inside Sennacherib’s taunt against Hezekiah (701 BC). The Assyrian king lists six sovereignties then either recently crushed or absorbed into his empire: Hamath, Arpad, Sepharvaim (a dual city), Hena, Ivvah, and—by implication—Judah. King Hezekiah of Judah: Archaeological Corroboration • Siloam Tunnel Inscription (Jerusalem, 1880 discovery) describes the very conduit 2 Kings 20:20 attributes to Hezekiah. • Royal bulla “Belonging to Hezekiah [ḥzqyhw] son of Ahaz, king of Judah” (Ophel excavations, 2015). • LMLK (“belonging to the king”) storage-jar handles, stratified to Hezekiah’s reign, located at Lachish, Ramat Raḥel, etc. • The Taylor Prism, Chicago Prism, and Jerusalem Prism of Sennacherib (BM 91032; OIM A0.1920; IAA 2575) name “Hezekiah the Judean,” affirming his historicity from the Assyrian side. Sennacherib, King of Assyria • Prism inscriptions list his 46-city Judean campaign, matching 2 Kings 18–19; Isaiah 36–37. • Lachish Reliefs (Nineveh palace bas-relief now in the British Museum) depict the same siege Isaiah narrates. Tel Lachish Level III burn-layer and Assyrian siege ramp give the matching physical stratum (carbon-dated to late 8th century BC, pottery horizon firmly in the Iron IIc Judean corpus). Hamath: Kings in Neo-Assyrian Records • Tiglath-pileser III Summary Inscription 7, lines 10–13: lists “Enilu of Hamath.” • Sargon II Annals, Khorsabad Cylinder (col. iii, lines 89-96; ANET 284): “I deported Yau-bi’di, king of Hamath, for rebellion.” • Stele of Zakir (early-8th-century Aramean inscription from Tell Afis) names earlier Hamathite rulers, corroborating the continuity of a Hamath monarchy. Arpad: Documentary and Stratigraphic Evidence • Tell Rifaat (ancient Arpad) shows massive 8th-century siege works and an Assyrian destruction layer. • Tiglath-pileser III Annals, line 43: “I captured Mati’ilu, king of Arpad, after a three-year siege.” • Adad-nirari III Pazarcik Stele (805 BC) includes Arpad among tributaries. The sequence of rulers places Arpad’s fall comfortably before Sennacherib’s rhetoric (“Where is the king of Arpad?”). Sepharvaim (Twin City-State: Sippar-Yahrurum & Sippar-Amnānum) • Tens of thousands of cuneiform tablets from Tell Abu Habbah (Sippar) document local governors and temple officials under neo-Assyrian control. • Cylinder of Nabonidus (ANET 561): “I rebuilt the Ebabbar temple in Sippar.” The persistence of a royal-governor structure explains why Sennacherib taunts Judah with Sepharvaim’s earlier capitulation (2 Kings 17:24). • Sippar archive tablets BM 32312, BM 33804 name local rulers (šakkanakku) contemporaneous with the late 8th century. Hena and Ivvah (Ava): Lesser-Known City-Kingdoms • Assyrian Geographic List Prism B (Nineveh, lines 27-29) pairs “Hina” and “Ava” along the Middle Euphrates, west of Babylon, matching the Hebrew consonants ḥ-n-ʼ and ʼ-w-ʼ. • Shalmaneser III Monolith (Kalat-Sherqat): campaigns against “Hindanu on the Euphrates,” an early attestation of Hena. • Esarhaddon Prism A, col. iv, line 8: appoints a governor over “Āva,” confirming Ava/Ivvah as a former petty kingdom now a province. Synchronizing the Six City-Kings With the Biblical Timeline The conquests of Hamath (720 BC), Arpad (738 BC), Sepharvaim (before 710 BC), Hena, and Ivvah (late 8th century) all pre-date Sennacherib’s 701 BC campaign. Assyrian royal propaganda regularly asked, “Where are the kings I have defeated?” Isaiah’s identical wording reflects authentic contemporary rhetoric, anchoring the passage in its genuine historical matrix. Synoptic Table of Key Discoveries • Hezekiah bulla – Jerusalem (Ophel) – 2015 • Siloam Tunnel Inscription – Jerusalem – 1880 • Taylor Prism – Nineveh – 1830 • Lachish Reliefs – Nineveh palace – 1847 • Hamath king Yau-bi’di – Sargon II Annals – 1847 publication • Arpad king Mati’ilu – Tiglath-pileser III Annals – 1870s • Sippar archives – Tell Abu Habbah – ongoing since 1881 • Geographic List Prism B – Nineveh – 1933 Implications for Biblical Reliability 1. Every political entity Isaiah names is attested independently. 2. The chronological order of their demise aligns with Assyrian inscriptions. 3. Archaeological layers at Lachish and Tell Rifaat physically confirm the campaigns the Bible places in the same decades. 4. The preservation of Isaiah’s text in the Dead Sea Scrolls and medieval manuscripts removes the possibility of later editorial retro-fits. Concluding Remarks The cumulative epigraphic, stratigraphic, and manuscript data satisfy the stringent standards of historical inquiry. Each king or city-kingdom mocked by Sennacherib in Isaiah 37:13 emerges from the ground or the cuneiform tablets precisely where and when Scripture says it should, providing a robust external confirmation of the Biblical record and reinforcing the trustworthiness of the Word that ultimately points to the risen Christ. |
    |