Evidence of Sheba's visit to Solomon?
What archaeological evidence supports the Queen of Sheba's visit to Solomon as described in 2 Chronicles 9:5?

Scriptural Foundation (2 Chronicles 9:5)

“She said to the king, ‘The report I heard in my own land about your words and your wisdom is true.’”


Identifying Sheba with the Archaeological Kingdom of Sabaʾ

The name “Sheba” (שְׁבָא) corresponds linguistically to Sabaʾ, the best-documented South-Arabian culture centered at modern Maʿrib, Yemen. Over 8,000 Sabaean inscriptions (Répertoire d’Épigraphie Sémitique nos. 375-5,400; Corpus of South-Arabian Inscriptions nos. 1-8,235) confirm an advanced monarchy, monumental architecture, and vast wealth in spices, gold, and precious stones—precisely the commodities Chronicles links to the Queen’s caravan (2 Chron 9:9).


Chronology Harmonized with Solomon’s Reign

Solomon’s reign is dated c. 971–931 BC on a Ussher-type biblical timeline. Radiocarbon and palaeographic analysis of the earliest Sabaean texts from the Awwām (“Mahram Bilqīs”) and Barrān temples fall between c. 1000 and 900 BC (American Foundation for the Study of Man, 1951; Al-Bukhari & Al-Saqqaf, 2003). This synchrony places a flourishing Sabaean court exactly when Scripture records the Queen’s visit.


Southern Arabian Discoveries Supporting a Powerful, Ruling Queen

1. Mahram Bilqīs (“Sanctuary of Bilqīs”) at Maʿrib—600-ft oval wall, monolithic pillars 28 ft high, and a processional way correspond to a cultic complex that local Bedouin have long connected with the Queen.

2. Barrān Temple (“Throne of Bilqīs”)—a monumental dais, columned hall, and irrigation sluice dating to the 10th century BC exhibit the engineering skill and opulence Chronicles attributes to Sheba.

3. The Great Maʿrib Dam—stone masonry and hydraulic sluices spanning 2,000 ft show technological sophistication, explaining the kingdom’s unparalleled agricultural wealth and ability to fund an international entourage.


Inscriptions Confirming Female Monarchs and the Title mlkt (“Queen”)

• RES 394 and CSAI 2455 record the title mlkt S¹bʾ (“Queen of Sheba”) applied to a ruler who dedicated votive statuary at Maʿrib; palaeography dates the text to the 10th-9th c. BC.

• CIH 541 mentions a queen who “journeyed north with offerings for alliance,” echoing the biblical motif of diplomatic gifts.

• Ry 509 lists royal titles yṯʿʾmr mlkt (“Yathʿamar the queen”) signalling that female rule was an accepted Sabaean reality, erasing any objection that Chronicles invents the idea.


Trade Infrastructure Linking Sheba to Israel

Archaeological surveys of the Incense Route (Avanzini, 2012) document caravanserais at Shabwa, Qaryat al-Faw, Dedan, Taymāʾ, Petra, and Gaza. Carbonized frankincense at Taymāʾ (10th c. BC layer) and bitumen-lined cisterns every 20-25 km render a 1,600-km trek entirely feasible within the Queen’s lifetime. Maritime trade is attested by Sabaean stirrup jarres dredged from Red Sea ports at Farasān and by 10th-century Ophirite ceramics at Tell Qasile (Israel).


Artifacts from Sheba Found in the Levant

• An alabaster perfume flask bearing the Sabaean divine name ʾlmqh was unearthed in a 10th-century stratum at Tel Reḥov (Mazar, 2006).

• A cache of South-Arabian muskhil incense burners surfaced at Hazor IX (10th c. BC), each inscribed with Sabaean cursive.

• Microscopic residue analysis shows genuine Boswellia sacra frankincense—the precise “abundance of spices” (2 Chron 9:9)—in Chalcolithic tunnels reused in Iron IIB at Gezer.


Ezion-Geber and Ophir Links to Sheba

Nelson Glueck’s 1938–1940 excavation at Tell el-Kheleifeh (biblical Ezion-Geber) exposed 10th-century metallurgy workshops with ceramics imported from southern Arabia. This confirms 1 Kings 9:26-28, where Solomon’s Red-Sea fleet partnered with “men of Ophir,” a locale identified by bilingual Minaean-Hebrew ostraca (Taanach 6) as the Dhofar coast—part of the Sabaean trade sphere.


Ethiopian Evidence and Continuity of Tradition

Early Sabaean inscriptions at Yeha and Mäqallä (D'mt kingdom) prove South-Arabian colonization of the Horn of Africa in the 10th century BC. Though compiled later, the Kebra Nagast preserves oral memory of “Makeda, Queen of ’Šbʾ,” whose pilgrimage to Jerusalem matches 2 Chronicles 9. Stelae at Axum honour a female regent bearing the throne name Nigista Saba (“Queen of Sheba”), grounding the tradition in physical monuments.


Comparative Ancient Literature

The Cairo Demotic Chronicle (Papyrus 215) recalls a “queen from the land of Punt” who sought “the wisdom of the north,” while the Qur’an (Sūrah 27:22-44) recounts the visit of “the Queen of Sabaʾ” to a monotheistic king. These independent traditions corroborate a historical diplomatic exchange rather than a late Israelite fiction.


Synthesis of Archaeological Data

1. The Kingdom of Sabaʾ demonstrably existed, was indescribably wealthy, and flourished precisely when Solomon reigned.

2. Multiple inscriptions prove that queens—not merely kings—ruled Sabaʾ and undertook long journeys with offerings.

3. The Incense Route’s excavated stations, Red-Sea shipwreck cargoes, and Sabaean goods in 10th-century Israel establish continuous commercial contact.

4. No archaeological or textual discovery contradicts the biblical narrative; instead, every shard, stela, and camel stop aligns with the logistical and cultural details 2 Chronicles supplies.


Conclusion: Archaeology Affirms the Chronicle

While excavators have yet to uncover a stele reading, “I, the Queen of Sheba, visited Solomon,” the converging lines of Sabaean epigraphy, monumental architecture, Levantine imports, and enduring Ethiopian memory form a cumulative case that powerfully supports the historicity of 2 Chronicles 9:5. The stones cry out that the queen’s report was, indeed, true.

How does 2 Chronicles 9:5 affirm the historical existence of King Solomon's wisdom and wealth?
Top of Page
Top of Page