Exodus 5:2: Pride, defiance to God?
What does Exodus 5:2 reveal about human pride and resistance to God?

Text of Exodus 5:2

“But Pharaoh replied, ‘Who is the LORD, that I should obey His voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and I will not let Israel go.’”


Immediate Narrative Setting

Moses has just conveyed God’s command to release Israel. Pharaoh’s curt retort forms the first recorded speech of Egypt’s king in the Exodus story. The verse inaugurates a prolonged confrontation between human autonomy and divine authority that dominates the next ten chapters.


Pride Expressed in Pharaoh’s Questions

1. “Who is the LORD…?”—an epistemological challenge. Pharaoh insinuates that Yahweh lacks standing in Egypt’s pantheon.

2. “…that I should obey His voice…?”—a moral challenge. Even if such a deity existed, Pharaoh sees no obligation to yield.

3. “I do not know the LORD, and I will not let Israel go.”—an act-of-will declaration. Rejection of knowledge and obedience culminates in flat refusal.


Literary Devices Underscoring Defiance

Hebrew word order front-loads “Who is the LORD” (מִי יְהוָה) for emphasis. The repetition of the first-person singular—“I… I… I… will not”—highlights ego centrality. The next chapters reveal a chiastic structure in which each plague dismantles an Egyptian deity, answering Pharaoh’s question by demonstration (cf. Exodus 7:5; 12:12).


The Theology of Knowing God

Scripture equates “knowing” God with covenant loyalty (Jeremiah 9:23-24; Hosea 4:1). Pharaoh’s ignorance is willful, not informational. Romans 1:21 echoes the principle: “For although they knew God, they neither glorified Him as God nor gave thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking.”


Psychological and Behavioral Dynamics

Behavioral science recognizes “reactance”: when perceived freedom is threatened, individuals double down on autonomous choice. Pharaoh’s palace culture had deified the king; conceding to Moses would unravel his social identity. Cognitive dissonance thus pushes him toward escalated rebellion despite mounting evidence.


Comparative Biblical Portraits of Pride

• Babel’s builders (Genesis 11:4) sought a name for themselves, resulting in dispersion.

• King Uzziah, “marvelously helped till he was strong,” entered the sanctuary in pride and was struck with leprosy (2 Chronicles 26:16-21).

• Nebuchadnezzar’s boast, “Is not this great Babylon which I have built…?” (Daniel 4:30-31), precipitated his humiliation.

These parallels show that pride’s core is self-exaltation above divine prerogative.


Consequences Unfolding in Exodus

Plagues intensify from nuisance (blood, frogs) to existential threat (darkness, death of firstborn). Each judgment displays:

• God’s patience (opportunities between plagues for repentance).

• Justice proportionate to defiance.

• Grace toward Israel, culminating in redemption (Exodus 6:6-8).

Pharaoh’s initial attitude in 5:2 sets the trajectory toward national catastrophe and demonstrates Proverbs 16:18 : “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.”


Historical and Archaeological Corroborations

• The Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC) names “Israel” in Canaan, confirming an exodus-era populace.

• Papyrus Ipuwer records Nile turned to blood, servants fleeing, and widespread death—strikingly parallel to the plagues sequence.

• Excavations at Avaris (Tell el-Dabʿa) reveal a Semitic slave quarter that was suddenly vacated, aligning with the biblical departure.

• Egyptian royal inscriptions consistently exalt the pharaoh’s divinity, matching the prideful tone of Exodus 5:2.


Christological Trajectory

Just as Pharaoh’s “Who is the LORD?” challenged Moses’ message, Pilate asked Jesus, “What is truth?” (John 18:38). Both questions spring from the same autonomous posture. Yet the resurrection vindicates Christ’s authority (Acts 17:31), answering every Pharaoh-like skeptic with historical fact.


Practical Application for Today

• Self-sovereignty manifests in modern rejection of divine moral claims.

• Evidence—cosmological fine-tuning, irreducible biological complexity, manuscript attestation—collectively answers, “Who is the LORD?” Ignoring such evidence mirrors Pharaoh’s folly.

• Humility before God is prerequisite to spiritual liberation (James 4:6-10).


Summary

Exodus 5:2 showcases pride as a deliberate dismissal of God’s right to command. It exposes the psychology of unbelief, foreshadows judgment, and sets the stage for redemption. The verse warns every generation that the path from “Who is the LORD?” to downfall is tragically short, while the path of humble obedience leads to freedom and life.

How does Pharaoh's response in Exodus 5:2 challenge the concept of divine authority?
Top of Page
Top of Page