How does Genesis 11:20 fit into the genealogy of Shem's descendants? Genesis 11:20 – Berean Standard Bible “When Reu was thirty-two years old, he became the father of Serug.” Immediate Literary Setting Genesis 11:10–26 enumerates ten post-Flood patriarchs in direct descent from Shem to Abram. Each entry follows an identical pattern: (1) the patriarch’s age at the birth of his named son, (2) the years lived after that birth, and (3) the total lifespan. Verse 20 is the sixth datum in this structured list: • 11:10 – Shem • 11:12 – Arphaxad • 11:14 – Shelah • 11:16 – Eber • 11:18 – Peleg • 11:20 – Reu • 11:22 – Serug • 11:24 – Nahor • 11:26 – Terah (father of Abram) Thus Genesis 11:20 functions as a precision link in an unbroken chain that purposely drives the narrative from the Flood toward the covenant with Abraham. Chronological Placement in a Conservative (Ussher-Type) Timeline Flood ends: 2348 BC Shem fathers Arphaxad: 2346 BC … Peleg fathers Reu: 2214 BC (Peleg age 30, v.18) Reu fathers Serug: 2182 BC (Reu age 32, v.20) Reu’s death: 1943 BC (lived 207 yrs, v.21) The verse therefore anchors Reu squarely in the 23rd century BC, only 194 years after the Flood, demonstrating that within two centuries a new patriarchal generation is already poised to carry the Messianic line. Structural and Theological Function 1. Continuity of Promise – The verse proves that God preserved an identifiable lineage from Noah to Abram, validating the later covenant (Genesis 15) and, ultimately, Messianic fulfillment (Luke 3:35-36). 2. Diminishing Lifespans – Reu’s 207-year life marks a steady post-Flood decline, correlating with the divine limitation implied in Genesis 6:3. 3. Genealogical Reliability – Repetition of formulaic language—“When X was Y years old, he became the father of Z”—argues for intentional historical record-keeping rather than mythic embellishment. Historical and Archaeological Corroboration • Mari and Ebla tablets (18th–24th cent. BC) contain names phonetically parallel to Peleg, Reu (Ra-ah), and Serug (Šarrugi), matching the post-Flood Mesopotamian milieu. • The city of Sarugi/Serek, 35 km northwest of Harran, reflects Serug’s name and situates his descendants geographically near where Terah will migrate (Genesis 11:31). • Early dynastic king lists from Kish and Ur exhibit lifespan contraction similar to Genesis 11: a rapid drop from pre-Flood-type ages to spans under 300 years, attesting to a remembered demographic shift. Answering Common Objections “Are these numbers symbolic?” The verse embeds numeric specificity inconsistent with Hebrew poetic symbolism. Narrative prose plus exact arithmetic totals (“Reu lived 207 years”) functions as ledger entries. The repetition across manuscripts and New Testament citation negates allegorization. “Why the LXX difference?” The Septuagint translators likely compensated for an alternate chronological scheme to harmonize with then-current Egyptian king lists; yet they preserved the sequence, thus still testifying to Reu’s historicity. Practical Application Because God meticulously preserved this lineage, believers can trust He attends no less to the details of their own lives (Matthew 10:30). Genesis 11:20 encourages the reader to view personal history within God’s larger redemptive genealogy. Summary Genesis 11:20 is a precise genealogical link, affirmed by manuscript evidence, archaeological resonance, and New Testament citation. It situates Reu in the unfolding covenant narrative, illustrates post-Flood demographic realities, and forms an indispensable step toward the incarnation and resurrection of Jesus Christ. |
    |