How does Genesis 24:57 reflect on free will in biblical narratives? Canonical Text “So they said, ‘Let us call the girl and ask her opinion.’” (Genesis 24 : 57) Immediate Narrative Setting Abraham’s servant has completed every condition he prayed for (24 : 12–21), yet before the caravan departs, Rebekah’s family pauses and openly seeks her own word. This single verse is framed by divine providence (vv. 7, 40), covenantal purpose (vv. 3–4), and voluntary human participation (vv. 58–60), making it a textbook snapshot of Scripture’s balance between God’s sovereignty and human free agency. Cultural Backdrop and the Unusual Appeal to Rebekah Second-millennium BC marriage contracts normally rested with the patriarchal household; female consent is rarely highlighted in Near Eastern texts (cf. Nuzi tablets, Mari letters). Genesis, however, repeatedly dignifies the woman’s will (e.g., 29 : 18–20; Ruth 3 : 11). By explicitly summoning Rebekah, the narrator signals that her personal decision is essential, not incidental, to the covenant storyline. Divine Sovereignty and Human Choice Interwoven a. Providential Guidance—Yahweh “guided me on the journey” (24 : 48). b. Human Response—Rebekah answers, “I will go” (24 : 58). The chapter therefore models biblical compatibilism: God ordains the end (Isaac’s wife from Abraham’s kin) and the means (Rebekah’s free yes). Other canonical parallels reinforce the pattern: Joseph’s brothers act freely yet fulfill divine intent (Genesis 50 : 20); Cyrus issues a decree “so the word of the LORD by Jeremiah might be fulfilled” (2 Chronicles 36 : 22–23). Rebekah’s Consent as a Proto-Evangel of Volitional Faith Rebekah trusts a promise she has not yet seen—much like believers who answer Christ’s call (John 20 : 29; Romans 10 : 9). Her response prefigures later invitations to choose covenant life: “I have set before you life and death… choose life” (Deuteronomy 30 : 19); “Choose this day whom you will serve” (Joshua 24 : 15). Broader Old Testament Witness to Free Will • Adam and Eve (Genesis 2–3) exercise choice and bear consequence. • Israel repeatedly “would not listen” (Jeremiah 7 : 13), proving real refusal is possible. • Ruth freely clings to Naomi: “Your God will be my God” (Ruth 1 : 16). These texts confirm that Scripture consistently portrays humans as morally responsible agents within God’s redemptive plan. New Testament Continuity Christ’s invitations—“Come to Me” (Matthew 11 : 28), “Whoever believes” (John 3 : 16)—echo Genesis 24 : 57’s respect for personal assent. Mary’s “May it be to me according to your word” (Luke 1 : 38) mirrors Rebekah’s “I will go,” underscoring that salvation history advances through willing participants. Philosophical and Behavioral Considerations Human volition is irreducible to material causation. Cognitive-behavioral studies show that authentic decision-making presupposes an immaterial mind capable of evaluating alternate futures—an observation consonant with man being made “in the image of God” (Genesis 1 : 27). Moral accountability, by definition, requires genuine choice; Scripture supplies the ontological ground for that freedom. Practical and Evangelistic Implications The verse legitimizes inviting individuals to respond personally to God’s overtures. Evangelism neither coerces nor merely informs; it presents Christ and asks, “What is your decision?” Just as Rebekah’s free ‘yes’ advanced the Abrahamic promise, each person’s response to the risen Christ (Romans 10 : 13) determines participation in the new covenant. Summary Genesis 24 : 57 showcases free will by: 1. Highlighting Rebekah’s consent within a patriarchal culture. 2. Demonstrating compatibilism—divine planning married to human choice. 3. Providing a template for later biblical invitations to choose faithfulness. 4. Undergirding moral responsibility and evangelistic practice. Thus, the verse is a concise yet profound witness that God’s sovereign purposes unfold through—never apart from—authentic human decisions. |
    |