How does Genesis 6:5 reflect on human nature and inherent sinfulness? Genesis 6:5 In Its Inspired Wording “Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great upon the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was altogether evil all the time.” Immediate Historical Setting Genesis 1–5 describes a good creation marred by Adam’s rebellion (3:1-19) and a spreading violence culminating in Lamech’s boast of murder (4:23-24). Genesis 6:5 provides God’s own assessment just before the Flood narrative (6:5-8:22). The verse is a divine courtroom verdict, not a mere human opinion. Theological Core: Total Depravity Genesis 6:5 articulates the doctrine that human beings, since the Fall, are corrupted in mind, emotion, and will. Scripture echoes this: • Genesis 8:21—“the intent of man’s heart is evil from his youth.” • Psalm 51:5; Jeremiah 17:9; Ecclesiastes 7:20. • Romans 3:10-18; 5:12-19; Ephesians 2:1-3. “Total” does not mean every act is maximally wicked, but that every faculty is tainted, leaving no spiritual aptitude to merit God’s favor apart from grace. Canonical Progression and Redemptive Trajectory The verse sets the stage for: 1. The Flood—God’s holy judgment and merciful preservation of a remnant (6:8, 18). 2. The covenant with Noah—divine commitment despite ongoing sin (8:21-22; 9:11-17). 3. The anticipation of a greater Deliverer whose work addresses the heart, fulfilled in Jesus Christ (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Matthew 1:21; Hebrews 8:10-12). Contrast with Ancient Near Eastern Texts Sumerian and Akkadian flood myths (e.g., Atrahasis, Gilgamesh XI) attribute the deluge to capricious gods annoyed by human noise. Genesis uniquely grounds judgment in moral evil—a concept coherent only under a righteous, personal Creator. Philosophical Consistency If humanity were intrinsically good, the ubiquity of evil would require an external corrupting force more powerful than human agency—a concept Scripture rejects. Instead, Genesis 6:5 explains evil as endogenous, tracing back to the historic Fall (Genesis 3). This provides a coherent metaphysic of moral realism and avoids the infinite regress problem of locating evil’s origin. Archaeological and Geological Notes • Marine fossils atop the Himalayas and North American strata with polystrate tree trunks align with a rapid, catastrophic deluge model. • Near-universal flood traditions (over 300 cultures catalogued by missionary anthropologists) act as collective memory consistent with Genesis 7-8. The moral rationale present only in Genesis supports the verse’s diagnosis of pervasive sin. Christological Fulfillment Jesus identifies the pre-Flood days as a paradigm for His return (Matthew 24:37-39). He confronts the identical heart problem (Mark 7:20-23) and offers substitutionary atonement, resurrection proof (1 Corinthians 15:3-4), and transformative grace (2 Corinthians 5:17). Practical and Pastoral Application • Humility: Recognize personal inability to self-cure moral corruption. • Watchfulness: Understand cultural decline as a symptom, not the disease itself. • Hope: The same God who judged also provided an ark; today He offers Christ. • Mission: Proclaim the gospel, appealing to conscience already testifying of sin’s reality. Conclusion Genesis 6:5 is not an ancient pessimism; it is divine diagnosis. Its truth resonates in history, science, psychology, and daily news. Yet the verse also foreshadows grace: a holy God who sees the worst in us still pursues redemption. “But Noah found favor in the eyes of the LORD” (Genesis 6:8). In Christ, that favor stands open to all who believe. |
    |