Hebrews 7:18 on old commandment's effect?
What does Hebrews 7:18 imply about the effectiveness of the old commandment?

Immediate Literary Context

Verses 11–19 draw a contrast between the Levitical priesthood and Christ’s priesthood “according to the order of Melchizedek.” Verse 19 adds, “(for the Law perfected nothing), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.” The author’s argument climaxes in 8:13: “By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first obsolete.”


What Is the “Former Commandment”?

Contextually it refers to the Mosaic legislation that established the Levitical priesthood (cf. 7:11–12). The entire cultic system—priests, sacrifices, temple ritual—comprised that “commandment.”


Why It Was Declared Ineffective

1. Inability to Perfect the Worshiper

Hebrews 10:1–4 observes that animal sacrifices “can never, by the same sacrifices offered year after year, make perfect those who draw near.” The Law diagnosed sin (Romans 3:20) but supplied no final cure.

2. Non-Perpetual Priesthood

Levitical priests were “prevented by death from continuing in office” (Hebrews 7:23). Their mortality underscored the transitory nature of the system.

3. Symbolic, Preparatory Function

Galatians 3:24: “So the Law became our guardian to lead us to Christ.” Its weakness was intentional; it pointed beyond itself.

4. External Orientation

Hebrews 9:9–10 labels the regulations “external ordinances imposed until the time of reformation.” They regulated conduct but could not regenerate hearts (Jeremiah 31:33).


Harmony with Old Testament Revelation

Psalm 40:6–8 and Hosea 6:6 anticipate that sacrifices alone are insufficient.

Jeremiah 31:31–34 foretells a New Covenant with internalized law and final forgiveness.

The “ineffectiveness” theme therefore coheres with the Tanakh’s prophetic trajectory.


Christ’s Superior Priesthood

Jesus, “made perfect forever” (Hebrews 7:28), offers a “once for all” sacrifice (Hebrews 10:10). Because He possesses “the power of an indestructible life” (7:16), His mediation accomplishes what the old commandment could not—bringing believers directly to God (7:19).


Common Misconceptions Addressed

1. “Weak” Means Morally Flawed

No; Romans 7:12 calls the Law “holy, righteous, and good.” Its weakness lay in human fallenness and its own design limitations.

2. Grace Negates All Moral Obligation

Hebrews condemns apostasy (10:26-31); moral obedience remains essential but flows from the indwelling Spirit rather than from ritual law-keeping.

3. Setting Aside Contradicts Jesus’ Words in Matthew 5:17

Christ “fulfilled” (plērōsai) the Law by accomplishing its types and prophecies, thereby bringing its sacrificial and priestly aspects to completion.


Practical Implications

• Assurance: A believer rests in a completed atonement, not repetitive rites.

• Access: “Let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith” (Hebrews 10:22).

• Worship: Emphasis shifts from temple ritual to Spirit-empowered service (Romans 12:1).

• Evangelism: The Law’s inability underscores every person’s need for the Savior (Galatians 3:22).


Summary

Hebrews 7:18 declares the Mosaic priestly commandment annulled because, by divine design, it lacked power to perfect. Its sacrificial symbols pointed to the all-sufficient, eternal priesthood of Jesus Christ. The verse exposes the Law’s provisional nature while magnifying the gospel’s efficacy—inviting every reader to trust the resurrected High Priest who alone accomplishes salvation.

How does Hebrews 7:18 challenge the necessity of the Old Testament law?
Top of Page
Top of Page