Does Daniel 11:2 provide evidence for the divine inspiration of the Bible? Text of Daniel 11:2 “Now then, I will tell you the truth: Behold, three more kings will arise in Persia, and then a fourth, who will become far richer than all the others. When he has gained power by his wealth, he will stir up everyone against the realm of Greece.” Historical Fulfillment of the Prophecy Daniel’s single sentence sketches nearly 60 years of Persian history with a clarity that matches extant classical sources. After Cyrus (the reigning monarch when Daniel received this vision, cf. Daniel 10:1), three further Persian kings did arise—Cambyses II (530–522 BC), Bardiya/Smerdis (the brief usurper, 522 BC), and Darius I Hystaspes (522–486 BC). The “fourth” king, Xerxes I (486–465 BC), inherited vast wealth, commanded the largest army of the ancient Near East, and famously “stirred up” all of Persia against Greece in 480 BC, as chronicled by Herodotus (Histories 7.27-7.141). The prophecy terminates precisely at the onset of the Greco-Persian wars, the very flashpoint that sets the stage for the subsequent Greek section of Daniel 11 (vv. 3-35). Identification of the Four Kings 1. Cambyses II—extended Persian territory into Egypt, exactly filling the predictive gap between Cyrus and the Greek conflict. 2. Bardiya (Smerdis/Gaumata)—a short-lived claimant, yet counted by both Herodotus and the Behistun Inscription as a reigning “king.” 3. Darius I—reorganized the empire’s finances, built the Royal Road, and greatly increased tax revenue, explaining the mounting riches necessary for the fourth king’s campaign. 4. Xerxes I—possessed an unprecedented treasury (Herodotus 7.27) spent on the canal at Mount Athos, pontoon bridges across the Hellespont, and the mobilization of perhaps 200,000–300,000 troops—“stirring up everyone” against Greece. None of Daniel’s terms are vague. The sequence, the wealth differential, and the anti-Greek campaign converge so tightly with the historical record that even skeptical commentaries concede the accuracy of verse 2. Chronological Precision The vision is dated “in the third year of Cyrus king of Persia” (Daniel 10:1), that is, 536/535 BC. Xerxes’ invasion began 56 years later. No Persian or Greek document from the sixth century could have supplied such anticipatory detail; more than half a century intervened. The most economical explanation is foreknowledge. Archaeological Corroboration • Behistun Inscription (Darius I): verifies Bardiya’s short usurpation and Darius’ succession, mirroring Daniel’s “three… and a fourth.” • Persepolis Treasury Tablets: confirm Darius’ accumulation of precious metals, explaining the comparative wealth of Xerxes, his heir. • Xerxes’ Gate and inscriptions at Persepolis: document the vast resources devoted to the Greek expedition. • Cyrus Cylinder (539 BC): validates Cyrus’ benevolence policy (Isaiah 44:28; 45:1) and frames Daniel’s Persian chronology. Statistical Improbability of Fulfilled Prophecy Granting Daniel’s date c. 536 BC, the odds of naming the number of intervening kings (three), describing the unparalleled wealth of the fourth, and forecasting his unique campaign against Greece—without erring—defies chance. Using a conservative probability of .25 for each accurate element (number, wealth, aggressor identification) yields (.25)^3 ≈ 1/64; this does not yet factor in the precise starting point (Cyrus) or the unbroken sequence. Compound accuracy argues strongly for supernatural disclosure. Answering Critical Objections Objection 1: “Daniel was written after the events.” Response: Qumran manuscripts and the Septuagint predate Xerxes’ invasion by more than two centuries, dismantling a late-date hypothesis for verse 2. Objection 2: “Daniel’s sequence excludes Artaxerxes, so it is flawed.” Response: Verse 2 deliberately stops at Xerxes because the historical pivot to Greece begins with him; the text is not offering a full Persian king list but only those specific to the forthcoming Hellenistic narrative (Daniel 11:3-35). Objection 3: “Daniel relies on common knowledge.” Response: No extant sixth-century sources predict a wealthy Persian king’s future Greek war. Herodotus (fifth century) reports the event retrospectively, not prospectively. Theological Implications Fulfilled prophecy authenticates the voice of the God who “declares the end from the beginning” (Isaiah 46:10). Daniel 11:2 thus functions as a historical marker validating the subsequent Messianic promises in Daniel 7 and 9, culminating in the resurrection of Christ (cf. Daniel 12:2; Acts 2:31). If Scripture speaks infallibly on verifiable history, it merits trust in spiritual matters; the same prophetic chain that anticipated Xerxes also foretold an everlasting kingdom inaugurated by the risen Son of Man. Conclusion: Evidential Force for Divine Inspiration Daniel 11:2 stands as a concise yet striking exhibit of foreknowledge fulfilled. The passage is textually secure, historically corroborated, linguistically authentic, archaeologically supported, and statistically improbable by natural means. Consequently, it offers compelling evidence that the Bible is not merely human literature but the divinely inspired Word of God. |
    |