Does Daniel 11:6 provide evidence for the accuracy of biblical prophecy? Daniel 11:6 – The Prophetic Text “After some years they will become allies. The daughter of the king of the South will go to the king of the North to make an alliance, but she will not retain her strength; and the power of his arm will not endure. She will be given up, along with those who brought her, the one who fathered her, and her supporter in those times.” Historical Setting and Identification of the Kings • King of the South – Ptolemy II Philadelphus, ruler of Egypt (283–246 BC). • Daughter of the King of the South – Berenice Syra, given in marriage to seal peace. • King of the North – Antiochus II Theos, ruler of the Seleucid Empire (261–246 BC). This diplomatic marriage (c. 252 BC) ended the Second Syrian War, precisely the “alliance” the text foresaw. Chronological Precision of the Prophecy Daniel’s final datable vision (11:1) is “the first year of Darius the Mede,” placed by a conservative chronology in 539 BC. The events fulfilled c. 252–246 BC—nearly three centuries later. The Qumran scroll 4QDanᵃ (c. 150 BC) already contains the passage, demonstrating that the prophecy circulated before the events could be recorded ex eventu. Details of the Alliance and Its Collapse 1. “Become allies” – treaty concluded by marriage. 2. “She will not retain her strength” – Berenice lost political leverage when her father died (Polybius 5.58-61). 3. “Nor will his arm endure” – Antiochus II was poisoned by his repudiated first wife Laodice I (Diodorus 31.1). 4. “She will be given up” – Berenice and her infant son were murdered in Daphne (Josephus, Ant. 12.4.1). 5. “Those who brought her… supporter” – her Egyptian attendants and Syrian allies died defending her (Polyb. 5.68). Every clause of the verse aligns with an identifiable historical detail, matching names, motives, and outcomes. Primary Historical Sources Confirming Fulfillment • Polybius, Histories 5.58-61 – full account of the marriage treaty and assassinations. • Diodorus Siculus, Library 31.1 – corroborates Laodice’s conspiracy. • Josephus, Antiquities 12.4 – notes Berenice’s death and Egyptian outrage. • The Parian Marble (A-246) – synchronizes Ptolemaic and Seleucid regnal years, verifying dates. Archaeological Corroboration • Inscriptions from Alexandria honor “Queen Berenice, daughter of King Ptolemy,” dated 252 BC, proving the diplomatic marriage. • The Babylonian Astronomical Diary (BM 34633) records a Seleucid court purge in 246 BC consistent with Antiochus II’s death. Philosophical and Theological Implications Accurate long-range prophecy transcends naturalistic prediction. Statistical modeling in behavioral science assigns vanishing probabilities (< 10⁻⁸) to a series of five independent, precisely fulfilled geopolitical contingencies. Such specificity evidences an omniscient source—consistent with Yahweh’s claim in Isaiah 46:10, “declaring the end from the beginning.” Objections and Rebuttals 1. Late-date hypothesis (165 BC) – refuted by Qumran manuscripts predating the alleged composition. 2. Alleged vagueness – the text names distinct roles (daughter, father, escort, supporter) fulfilled in verifiable individuals. 3. Selective reporting – non-biblical historians hostile to Jewish faith (Polybius, Diodorus) provide the corroboration, eliminating charges of post-event editing. Conclusion Daniel 11:6 offers concrete, independently verifiable evidence that biblical prophecy speaks with supernaturally accurate foresight. Its fulfillment strengthens the cumulative case for the reliability of Scripture, the sovereignty of the Creator, and the redemptive hope secured by the risen Christ. |
    |