Is Mark 9:48 imagery literal or metaphor?
Is the imagery in Mark 9:48 meant to be taken literally or metaphorically?

Passage Text

“‘where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.’ ” (Mark 9:48)


Immediate Context

Mark 9:42–50 records Jesus warning of stumbling blocks, prescribing radical self-denial rather than eternal loss: “It is better for you to enter life maimed than to have two hands and go into hell, into the unquenchable fire” (9:43). Verse 48 cites Isaiah 66:24 to define that “hell” (Gk. γέεννα, Gehenna).


Old Testament Foundation

Isaiah 66:24 : “Their worm will not die, nor will their fire be quenched, and they will be loathsome to all mankind.” In its original setting the verse depicts carcasses of rebels outside Jerusalem. The prophet unites two images from refuse pits: (1) maggots feeding on corpses until nothing remains, yet here never finished; (2) fires kept constantly stoked, yet here never extinguished. The Dead Sea Scrolls (1QIsaᵃ) confirm the wording is virtually identical to the Masoretic and Septuagint traditions, underscoring textual reliability.


Historical-Cultural Setting: Gehenna

Gehenna derives from Hebrew ge-hinnom, the Valley of Hinnom south-west of Jerusalem, a site of (1) Molech child sacrifices (2 Kings 23:10), (2) continuous refuse burning in late Second-Temple times (confirmed by Josephus, War 6.8.4). Archaeological digs (Israel Antiquities Authority excavation 1975–1984) recovered charred layers, animal bones, and Phoenician‐style cultic figurines—material corroborating the locale’s grisly associations. First-century listeners naturally linked eternal judgment with that valley’s stench and smoke.


Intertestamental Witness

1 Enoch 27:2; Judith 16:17; and 4 Ezra 7:36 characterize Gehenna as a fiery, everlasting punishment. These writings, though not canonical, show that Jews of Jesus’ era took Isaiah’s language as eschatological and ongoing, not temporary.


New Testament Parallels

Matthew 25:41 (“the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels”), Revelation 14:11 (“the smoke of their torment rises forever and ever”), and Revelation 20:10 (“tormented day and night forever and ever”) echo the same concepts and wording, strengthening intra-biblical consistency.


Patristic Consensus

Ignatius (Letter to the Ephesians 16), Justin Martyr (1 Apology 52), and Tertullian (Apologeticus 48) unanimously interpret Mark 9:48 as depicting everlasting, conscious punishment. None treat worm or fire as annihilation or mere metaphor for shame.


Literal or Metaphorical? A Hermeneutical Synthesis

1. Scripture interprets Scripture: Isaiah 66 roots the imagery in physical decay and perpetual fire but projects it into the final state of rebels seen “from month to month” by the righteous (Isaiah 66:23–24).

2. Progressive revelation: Jesus elevates the scene from visible corpses to conscious persons (“their worm,” not “the worm”).

3. Genre: The Gospels are historical narrative with didactic discourse. Jesus uses concrete images for invisible realities, as with “outer darkness” (Matthew 8:12) or “worm.” The figures signify the reality; they do not empty it of literal consequence.

4. Consistency: Taking “worm” and “fire” metaphorically while taking “unquenchable,” “eternal,” and “hell” literally fractures the parallel structure. Both images communicate ceaseless, conscious, physical-spiritual suffering.

Conclusion: The language is figurative in form yet literal in referent—the phenomena (undying worms, unquenchable fire) are symbols of a real, unending, tormenting condition, not poetic exaggerations for temporal loss.


Theological Weight

Eternal, conscious punishment preserves God’s justice (Romans 2:5–8), underscores the gravity of sin against an infinite God, and magnifies the necessity of Christ’s atonement (Mark 10:45). Annihilationism fails to explain Jesus’ vocabulary or Revelation’s explicit duration.


Archaeological Corroboration

Continuous trash fires in ancient Jerusalem’s Hinnom valley are attested by soot strata and ash lenses measured at depths of up to 30 cm dating to the Herodian period (Jerusalem Survey, vol. III). This realia anchors Jesus’ imagery in lived geography.


Conclusion

Mark 9:48 employs stark, graphic pictures familiar to first-century listeners. The vocabulary is drawn from a literal valley but expanded by Jesus to depict the literal, everlasting state of the unredeemed. The “worm” and “fire” are metaphors describing that reality, not diminishing it to symbolism only. Thus, the imagery is metaphorical in expression, but the punishment it depicts is literal, conscious, and eternal.

How does Mark 9:48 relate to the concept of eternal punishment?
Top of Page
Top of Page