What does John 11:15 reveal about Jesus's purpose for miracles? Text of John 11:15 “and for your sake I am glad I was not there, so that you may believe. But let us go to him.” Immediate Narrative Setting Jesus has received word that Lazarus is sick. Instead of going immediately to Bethany, He waits two days (John 11:6). Lazarus dies, and by the time Jesus arrives, four days have passed (11:17). The deliberately timed miracle will be performed in the presence of disciples, friends, mourners, and hostile observers from Jerusalem (11:45–46). Purpose Stated Explicitly: Faith Production Jesus allows temporary loss to yield greater gain. He withholds immediate relief so the coming sign will ground belief in His person and mission. The pattern matches John 2:11; 4:53; 6:14; 20:30-31: signs → belief → life. Miracles as Signs in Johannine Theology John never calls them “wonders” alone but “signs” (sēmeia). Signs point beyond themselves: • To identity—“that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God” (20:31). • To glory—“This illness is for God’s glory” (11:4). Miracles authenticate the incarnate Word and drive observers to a verdict (5:36; 10:38). Revelation of Divine Glory By orchestrating events, Jesus reproduces the creative voice of Genesis (“Lazarus, come out!” 11:43). Glory (doxa) is unveiled, answering Moses’ request in Exodus 33–34. The miracle places Christ’s authority over entropy, decay, and death itself. Foreshadowing the Resurrection of Christ Raising Lazarus prefigures Jesus’ own resurrection. Same tomb setting, stone, grave-cloths, witnesses. When Jesus rises, the disciples can interpret the empty tomb through the lens of Lazarus (cf. 20:8). Habermas notes that this interlocking pattern of precursor/resurrection bolsters the “minimal-facts” case for Easter faith. Pastoral Implications: Faith Under Delay Suffering and divine silence are not abandonment but staging for greater revelation. Behavioral research on delayed gratification affirms that postponed relief intensifies subsequent joy—mirroring the disciples’ maturation here (cf. Romans 5:3-5). Archaeological Corroboration Bethany (modern al-Eizariya) has first-century tomb complexes matching the description. Ossuaries labeled “Simon,” “Martha,” and “Lazarius” (common Judean names) have been catalogued within the vicinity, supporting plausibility of the setting. Philosophical and Scientific Implications A resurrection sign counters naturalistic finality. Information theory observes that life requires specified complexity; reversing death momentarily infuses lost information. Intelligent design argues that such control lies only in a super-intellect who authored the genetic code (cf. Colossians 1:17). Continuation in Ecclesial Experience Historical cases of medically attested resuscitations—e.g., George Müller’s documented prayer healings or modern peer-reviewed accounts collected by the Global Medical Research Institute—echo the Lazarus pattern: intervention → belief growth → gospel spread. Comparative Biblical Motif OT resurrections (1 Kings 17; 2 Kings 4) required prophetic prayer; Jesus commands life directly. The escalation underscores His unique divine status, aligning with Yahweh who “puts to death and gives life” (Deuteronomy 32:39). Eschatological Preview Lazarus’ return anticipates the universal resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:20-23). Jesus demonstrates the future now, assuring believers that death’s reign is temporary. Application for Modern Discipleship Christ may withhold immediate relief to deepen trust and showcase His glory later. Believers are encouraged to interpret delays through the lens of John 11:15, expecting faith-building outcomes. Conclusion John 11:15 explicitly reveals that Jesus performs miracles primarily to generate and mature authentic belief, thereby glorifying God and foreshadowing the climactic resurrection. Every dimension—historical, textual, theological, philosophical—converges on this purpose: that observers then and now might believe and thus receive life in His name. |
    |