What consequences are outlined in Joshua 2:20 for breaking the oath? Setting the Scene Joshua 2 recounts how two Israelite spies entered Jericho and found refuge in Rahab’s house. In exchange for her protection and secrecy, they swore an oath that she and her family would be spared when Israel attacked (Joshua 2:14). The agreement hinged on Rahab keeping their mission confidential. Consequence Clarified in Joshua 2:20 “‘And if you report our mission, we will be released from the oath you made us swear.’” (Joshua 2:20) • Rahab’s breach = their release – Disclosing the spies’ presence would free the Israelites from their promise. – The word “released” shows the binding nature of oaths in Scripture; once conditions were violated, the covenant dissolved (cf. Numbers 30:2). • Life-or-death stakes – Without the oath, Rahab and her family would share Jericho’s destruction (Joshua 6:17, 21). – The consequence wasn’t a minor penalty; it meant losing the very protection that would save their lives. • Legal and moral integrity – The spies underscored personal responsibility: Rahab’s obedience maintained the oath; her betrayal nullified it (Deuteronomy 23:21-23). – God’s people were obligated to keep vows only when terms were honored (Psalm 15:4). Why This Matters Today • God values truth-keeping – “Let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’” (Matthew 5:37). Breaking one’s word undermines covenant faithfulness. • Conditional promises remain conditional – Just as Rahab’s safety required obedience, many of God’s blessings are linked to trust and faithfulness (John 15:10). • Seriousness of vows – “When you make a vow to God, do not delay to fulfill it… it is better not to vow than to make a vow and not fulfill it.” (Ecclesiastes 5:4-5). – Joshua 2:20 reminds believers to weigh commitments carefully and honor them fully. |
    |