How does Judges 17:6 reflect the consequences of moral relativism in society? Text of Judges 17:6 “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” Historical Setting of the Verse After the death of Joshua, Israel existed as a loose confederation of tribes (Judges 2:6–19). God’s covenant stipulations in the Torah provided an absolute moral standard, but the people repeatedly ignored them. Archaeological layers at sites such as Tel Dan and Shiloh reveal abrupt cultural shifts and destruction levels consistent with the chaotic “cycles” described in Judges, corroborating the book’s depiction of lawlessness. Theological Implications: Objective Morality vs. Relativism 1. God alone defines good and evil (Genesis 2:17; Deuteronomy 6:17). 2. When that objective standard is rejected, moral judgments default to subjectivity, mirroring the serpent’s temptation, “you will be like God” (Genesis 3:5). 3. The book of Judges demonstrates Romans 1:21–25 in narrative form: suppression of truth leads to futile thinking and societal degradation. Consequences Displayed in Judges 17–21 • Religious Syncretism: Micah forges a private ephod and household gods, violating the second commandment. • Corrupted Leadership: A Levite, meant to teach Torah, sells his ministry for silver (17:10). • Tribal Violence: Danites steal idols and priest (18:17–20). • Sexual Anarchy: The Gibeah atrocity (19:22–30) echoes Sodom, evidencing that relativism reproduces pre-Flood depravity (Genesis 6:5). • Civil War and Near-Extinction of a Tribe: Benjamin’s decimation (chap. 20–21) shows that subjective morality fractures national cohesion. Philosophical Reflection Moral relativism is self-defeating: the assertion “all morals are relative” claims universal truth while denying universals. Classical theistic ethics—rooted in the unchanging character of God (Malachi 3:6; James 1:17)—avoids this contradiction and supplies a rational basis for moral obligation. Christological Trajectory Judges exposes humanity’s need for a righteous king. The refrain prepares for the Davidic covenant (2 Samuel 7) and ultimately Christ, “King of kings” (Revelation 19:16). Where relativism fails, the resurrection of Jesus (1 Corinthians 15:3-8) validates His authority to define morality and grant salvation. Practical Application for Contemporary Society Believers are called to uphold God’s fixed standards (Matthew 5:17-19). When legislation or culture mirrors “each did what was right in his own eyes,” expect deterioration in justice, family, and worship. The church serves as a “pillar and foundation of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15), countering relativism by proclaiming the gospel and modeling covenantal ethics. Conclusion Judges 17:6 is a concise diagnosis of moral relativism’s endgame: idolatry, violence, and societal fragmentation. The verse urges return to God’s unchanging word and the reign of Christ, the only antidote to the chaos of doing “what is right in one’s own eyes.” |
    |