Link Rev 17:3 & Daniel's visions: compare.
Connect Revelation 17:3 to Daniel's visions; what similarities and differences exist?

The scene John reports

“I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast…” (BSB, Revelation 17:3)

John finds himself in a desert place, watching a startling vision: a commanding woman astride a grotesque beast covered with blasphemous names, boasting seven heads and ten horns.


Daniel’s closest parallel

“I saw a fourth beast… and it had ten horns.” (BSB, Daniel 7:7)

Centuries earlier, Daniel had seen four successive beasts rising from the sea, the last of which was unmatched in ferocity and crowned with ten horns.


Similar settings

• Both prophets are “in the Spirit” (Revelation 17:3; Daniel 7:1–2) and observe symbolic creatures in hostile, untamed landscapes—John in a wilderness, Daniel by a turbulent sea.

• Angelic guides interpret what they see (Revelation 17:7; Daniel 7:16).

• A beast represents a geopolitical power opposed to God (Revelation 17:9–12; Daniel 7:17, 23).

• Ten horns point to ten rulers, later replaced or dominated by an eleventh (Revelation 17:12; Daniel 7:24–25).

• Blasphemy characterizes both monsters (Revelation 17:3; Daniel 7:25).


What Daniel lacks—and Revelation adds

• The woman: Revelation introduces “Babylon the Great,” a human system riding the beast; Daniel’s vision has no rider.

• Scarlet color: John highlights moral offensiveness (cf. Isaiah 1:18); Daniel describes metal, not color.

• Seven heads: Daniel’s fourth beast has no heads enumerated; Revelation merges imagery from Daniel’s first three beasts (Revelation 13:2) into one composite.

• Historical vantage point: Daniel looks forward to the cross; John writes after it, so the beast carries a harlot steeped in post-Calvary guilt.

• Final outcome: Daniel sees the beast destroyed by divine judgment (Daniel 7:11); John shows both woman and beast judged—first the harlot (Revelation 17:16), then the beast at Christ’s return (Revelation 19:20).


Key bridges between the books

1. Little horn ⇄ beast’s eighth king

– Daniel’s “little horn” grows from the ten (Daniel 7:8, 24–25).

– Revelation speaks of an “eighth” who “belongs to the seven” (Revelation 17:11). Both picture the end-time antichrist figure.

2. Ten-king coalition

– Daniel: “ten kings will arise” (7:24).

– John: “the ten horns… are ten kings… who hand over their authority to the beast” (17:12-13).

3. Duration of oppression

– Daniel: “time, times, and half a time” (7:25).

– Revelation: “forty-two months” (13:5)—the same three-and-a-half-year span.


Why the differences matter

• Progress of revelation: John receives fuller detail, showing how political power (the beast) and religious immorality (the woman) intertwine.

• Near-far layers: Daniel’s beasts preview empires up to Rome; John’s single beast folds those eras together and rolls prophecy forward to a still-future climax.

• Assurance for believers: both visions end with the beast destroyed and God’s kingdom established (Daniel 7:27; Revelation 20:4).


Pulling it together

Daniel gives the skeleton; Revelation adds flesh and color. Matching horns, blasphemy, and ultimate judgment confirm that both prophets describe the same satanic empire appearing in successive forms. Revelation 17:3 therefore stands as the New-Testament echo of Daniel’s fourth beast, assuring us that every kingdom opposed to Christ will fall—and that God, who authored both visions, is guiding history toward His promised victory.

How can we guard against the allure of worldly power described in Revelation 17:3?
Top of Page
Top of Page