What does John 16:25 mean by "figurative language" and how does it affect interpretation? Immediate Context within the Farewell Discourse Throughout chapters 13–16 Jesus has: 1. Washed feet—an enacted parable of servanthood. 2. Spoken of going “to prepare a place” (14:2)—a covenantal marriage metaphor. 3. Declared Himself the “true Vine” (15:1)—an agricultural symbol of covenant life. The disciples grasp certain surface elements yet miss the redemptive core. The Cross, Resurrection, and indwelling Spirit will provide the key (cf. 14:26; 16:13). Progressive Revelation and the Coming Clarity “A time is coming” points to two linked events: • The Resurrection—demonstrating Jesus’ identity, validating His claims (Romans 1:4). • Pentecost—when the Spirit will guide the apostles “into all the truth” (John 16:13). After these events, apostolic preaching (Acts 2:14-36) and Scripture (e.g., Romans 3–8; Ephesians 1-3) present the gospel with doctrinal explicitness unknown before the Cross. Role of the Holy Spirit in Moving from Figures to Plain Speech Jesus’ promise is realized as the Spirit empowers the apostles to: 1. Recall Christ’s words accurately (John 14:26). 2. Pen depth beyond their former comprehension (1 Corinthians 2:10-13). 3. Speak boldly even before hostile authorities (Acts 4:8-12). Therefore, post-Pentecost New Testament teaching constitutes the “plain” explanation of the Father and the Son. Examples of Jesus’ Prior Figurative Language • “Destroy this temple” (2:19) = His body and resurrection (2:21-22). • “Living water” (4:10) = the Spirit (7:38-39). • “Eat My flesh…drink My blood” (6:53) = believe in the atoning sacrifice (6:63). These sayings confused hearers until later clarification. John 16:25 acknowledges that pattern. Implications for Biblical Interpretation 1. Context-sensitive literalism: Scripture is truthful in the literary form chosen; metaphor is not less real than prose. 2. Progressive illumination: Old Testament prophecy, Christ’s earthly teaching, and apostolic doctrine form a coherent unfolding (Hebrews 1:1-2). 3. Christological centre: Figures of speech ultimately converge on the person and work of Jesus (Luke 24:27). Interpreters must therefore read the Gospels with Resurrection-informed hindsight while respecting each text’s original audience and genre. Hermeneutical Principles Derived from John 16:25 • Identify the figurative device (metaphor, hyperbole, parable). • Seek canonical completion—later Scripture often supplies the “plain” meaning. • Maintain doctrinal cohesion—no figure can be pressed into conclusions that contradict clear teaching elsewhere (2 Timothy 3:16-17). This guards against both wooden literalism (e.g., treating “I am the door” as physical) and sceptical dismissal (e.g., denying future bodily resurrection because earlier language was “figurative”). Consistency with the Broader Scriptural Witness Old Testament corollaries show the same trajectory: • Numbers 12:8—Moses enjoyed speech “face to face,” foreshadowing the clarity promised to the apostles. • Daniel 12:4—prophecy “sealed” until “the time of the end,” paralleling how Jesus’ mission remained partially veiled until fulfilled. • Isaiah 6:9-10—hardness of heart limits understanding; regeneration removes the veil (2 Corinthians 3:14-18). Historical and Theological Testimony Post-apostolic writers confirm the shift from figure to clarity: • Ignatius (c. AD 107) speaks of Christ “made manifest in flesh” and “revealed.” • Irenaeus argues that the apostles preached “openly and clearly” what Jesus had hinted at in parables. Archaeological finds—like early house-church baptistries depicting the Good Shepherd—show believers immediately grasped the metaphor’s soteriological substance once the Spirit had come. Application for the Modern Reader Because Jesus has fulfilled His promise of plain speech, believers today possess: 1. Completed Scripture, sufficient for knowledge of God. 2. The same Spirit, enabling understanding (1 John 2:27). 3. Mandated clarity in proclamation—gospel preaching must not obscure what Christ has made plain (2 Corinthians 4:2-4). Thus John 16:25 undergirds confident, clear evangelism grounded in the once-veiled, now-revealed work of the crucified and risen Lord. Conclusion “Figurative language” in John 16:25 signals the transitional nature of Jesus’ pre-Cross teaching. Following His Resurrection and the outpouring of the Spirit, the veil lifts, and the apostles articulate the Father’s saving plan without riddles. For interpretation, the verse legitimates recognizing metaphor while anchoring every symbol in historical, bodily, resurrected reality—calling readers to receive and proclaim that now-plain truth. |
    |