Philippians 2:6 and the Trinity link?
How does Philippians 2:6 relate to the concept of the Trinity?

Text of Philippians 2:6

“Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped.”


Immediate Context: The Christ Hymn (Philippians 2:5-11)

Verses 5-11 form an early Christian hymn that predates the letter itself by several years. Scholars date the epistle to c. A.D. 60; the hymn’s archaic vocab and rhythm mark it as a liturgical piece circulating within two or three decades of the resurrection. Its concentric structure moves from pre-existence (v. 6) to incarnation (v. 7), humiliation (v. 8), exaltation (vv. 9-11), and universal confession of Jesus as “Lord,” echoing Isaiah 45:23’s affirmation of Yahweh.


Ontological Equality with the Father

Equality is assumed, not achieved. Jesus is presented as fully divine before incarnation, sharing the same glory the Father possesses (John 17:5). The grammar forbids reading Him as a lesser being: only one who already owns infinite status can choose not to leverage it.


Functional Distinction Within the Godhead

While ontologically equal, the Son willingly submits to the Father’s salvific plan (Philippians 2:7-8). This voluntary subordination in role, not essence, illustrates intra-Trinitarian relationships: unity of nature, diversity of persons, harmony of will.


Pre-Existence and Incarnation: Evidence of Two Natures

“Existing” (present tense) contrasts with the aorist verbs “emptied” and “took.” The Son continues in divine nature while assuming human nature. He does not divest Himself of deity; He adds humanity. Colossians 2:9 corroborates: “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.”


Link to Old Testament Depictions of Divine Plurality

Genesis 1:26 (“Let Us make man”) and Isaiah 48:16 (“the Lord GOD has sent Me, and His Spirit”) hint at multiplicity within the one Yahweh. Philippians 2:6 crystallizes that plurality by naming the pre-existent Son, yet retaining monotheism: the Shema stands intact (Deuteronomy 6:4).


Harmony with New Testament Witness

John 1:1-3, Hebrews 1:3, and Colossians 1:15-17 echo the same motif: Jesus shares God’s essence, exercises cosmic creative power, and remains distinct in person. Philippians 2:6 is therefore integral, not isolated.


Witness of Early Christian Worship and Creeds

Ignatius of Antioch (c. A.D. 110) cites Jesus Christ as “our God” (Ephesians 18:2). The Nicene Creed (A.D. 325) codified homoousios—“of one substance with the Father”—borrowing its conceptual seed from passages like Philippians 2:6.


Historical Christ and the Resurrection as Vindication of Deity

The hymn’s final verse declares every knee will bow to Jesus. This universal homage is permissible only if He is Yahweh. The minimal-facts approach to the resurrection—empty tomb, post-mortem appearances, and the disciples’ transformation—grounds Jesus’ exaltation in historical reality, validating Paul’s claim of divine equality.


The Holy Spirit’s Role and Trinitarian Complementarity

Though unnamed in v. 6, the Spirit is woven through the letter (Philippians 1:19; 2:1). The Spirit glorifies Christ (John 16:14) and enables believers to confess “Jesus is Lord” (1 Corinthians 12:3), fulfilling the hymn’s prophecy. The three persons operate inseparably yet distinctly.


Answering Common Objections

1. Arianism: v. 6 presupposes eternal equality; a created being cannot possess morphē theou by nature.

2. Kenotic Misreadings: “emptied Himself” (v. 7) speaks of status, not subtraction of divine attributes. The Son limits their independent exercise, never their possession.

3. Modalism: Distinct verbs for Father’s exaltation (v. 9) and Son’s obedience (v. 8) demonstrate personal differentiation, not mere successive modes.


Philosophical Coherence of Triunity

A single infinite being can encompass three centers of self-consciousness without contradiction. Divine simplicity concerns God’s indivisible essence, not impersonality. Philippians 2 shows relational richness grounded in eternal love (John 17:24), answering why interpersonal attributes (love, communication) are ultimate realities.


Implications for Worship and Discipleship

Because the Son relinquished prerogatives for our salvation, believers are summoned to imitate His humility (v. 5). Yet worship is directed to Him precisely because He is fully God (v. 11). Any theology that diminishes either His deity or His humanity deprives the church of both model and mediator.


Summary

Philippians 2:6 affirms that Jesus Christ eternally shares God’s nature, voluntarily assumes a servant’s role, and thus reveals the dynamic interplay of equality and distinction within the one God. The verse stands as a cornerstone text for the doctrine of the Trinity, upheld by consistent manuscript evidence, echoed in the rest of Scripture, confessed by the earliest church, and vindicated by the historic resurrection.

What does 'did not consider equality with God' mean in Philippians 2:6?
Top of Page
Top of Page