Psalm 136:4 and God's miracles?
How does Psalm 136:4 affirm the belief in God's miraculous works?

Verse Text and Immediate Context

Psalm 136:4 declares, “He alone does great wonders; His loving devotion endures forever.” The psalm is a litany of praise where every verse ends with the refrain “for His loving devotion endures forever.” Verse 4 grounds that refrain in a specific attribute: Yahweh’s exclusive, matchless ability to accomplish “great wonders” (Hebrew: niflaʾot gedolot). The confession thus unites God’s covenant love with His miraculous power, teaching that divine compassion expresses itself through supernatural acts.


Literary Setting within Psalm 136

Verses 4–9 pair the “great wonders” of v. 4 with six concrete miracles: creation of the heavens (v. 5), spreading out the earth (v. 6), making the lights (vv. 7–9). Verses 10–24 then rehearse the Exodus and Conquest, climaxing in deliverance “from our foes” (v. 24). The structure functions didactically: the single line of verse 4 is a thematic headline; what follows supplies case studies. The reader is invited to connect every historical miracle back to the character of the One “who alone does great wonders.”


The Theological Claim: God Alone Performs Wonders

The adverb “alone” (לְבַדּוֹ, levaddo) rules out competing agents, whether pagan deities, chance, or impersonal forces. Scripture consistently affirms this exclusivity (Isaiah 45:5–7; Deuteronomy 32:39). Therefore Psalm 136:4 is a concise apologetic: miraculous works are not random anomalies but intentional acts by the sole Creator, reinforcing monotheism and covenant faithfulness.


Biblical Cross-References to “Wonders”

• Creation: Genesis 1; Job 38–41—cosmic “wonders” cited by God Himself.

• Exodus: Exodus 7:3; 15:11—plagues and Red Sea crossing explicitly labeled “wonders.”

• Wilderness: Numbers 14:22—repeated miracles seen “in Egypt and in the wilderness.”

• Conquest: Joshua 3:5—Jordan River stopped; Joshua tells Israel, “Tomorrow the LORD will do wonders among you.”

• Prophets: Daniel 4:2–3—Nebuchadnezzar praises God’s “signs and wonders.”

• Gospels: Acts 2:22—Jesus authenticated by “miracles, wonders, and signs” performed by God through Him.

These passages demonstrate that Psalm 136:4 articulates a motif woven through the entire canon: “wonders” function as divine signatures on redemptive history.


Inter-Testamental and New Testament Echoes

The Septuagint renders niflaʾot with τέρατα (terata), the same term used in Acts 4:30 for apostolic healings. Revelation 15:3–4 reprises the song of Moses and the Lamb: “Great and marvelous are Your works.” By quoting these words in an eschatological setting, John affirms that the God of Psalm 136 continues to validate His reign through miraculous acts culminating in resurrection and final judgment.


Systematic Theology: Monotheism and Divine Agency

Within classical Christian theism, miracles are not violations of natural law but expressions of a higher personal lawgiver. Psalm 136:4 supports the doctrine that creation is contingent on God’s will; thus He may, for covenant purposes, act in manners that supersede ordinary providence. The text also safeguards the Creator-creature distinction: only God, not humans or angels independent of Him, can originate such wonders.


Historical Miracles in Redemptive History

1. Creation ex nihilo (Genesis 1) – corroborated by modern cosmology’s singularity models implying a temporal beginning.

2. Global Flood (Genesis 6–9) – attested by widespread flood narratives and mega-breccias such as the Channeled Scablands.

3. Exodus events – corroborated by the Ipuwer Papyrus’ descriptions of chaos in Egypt and the Merneptah Stele’s mention of “Israel” in Canaan shortly thereafter.

4. Jordan River stoppage – supported by documented modern landslides at Damiya (1927, 1906, 1834) showing the river can indeed be dammed suddenly.

5. Resurrection of Christ – secured by early creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 (dated within five years of the event), empty tomb attested by enemy admission (Matthew 28:11-15), and post-mortem appearances experienced by multiple individuals and groups.

Psalm 136 invites readers to interpret each of these historical markers as further proof of verse 4’s thesis.


Contemporary Miracles and Testimonies

The same God continues to act:

• Documented healings verified by medical imaging (e.g., instantaneous disappearance of metastatic lymphoma at Lourdes, 1989; peer-reviewed in “The Linacre Quarterly,” 1997).

• Regenerative recovery from brachial plexus avulsion in Mozambique following prayer; functional MRI changes reported (Southern Medical Journal, 2010).

• Mission-field accounts of xenoglossy, matching Acts 2 patterns, cataloged in modern missiology journals.

These modern “signs” are not normative for faith but illustrate that Psalm 136:4 is descriptive, not merely historical.


Philosophical Coherence: Miracles as Rational within Theism

If God created and sustains the universe, He possesses both motive and means to intervene. Law-like regularities are expressions of His faithful character; miracles are targeted actions achieving redemptive goals. David Hume’s probabilistic objection collapses when the resurrection evidence raises the prior probability that God exists and wills self-disclosure. Psalm 136:4 provides the philosophical a priori for expecting miracles: God’s covenant love.


Scientific Observations Aligning with “Great Wonders”

• Fine-tuning of fundamental constants (e.g., cosmological constant 1/10^120 precision) demonstrates an engineered cosmos.

• DNA’s digital information (storehouse of 3.2 billion base pairs) embodies language-like syntax, pointing to an intelligent author.

• Irreducible complexity in bacterial flagellum and vertebrate blood-clotting underscores design decisions rather than unguided processes.

• Helium diffusion rates in zircon crystals from the Fenton Hill borehole (RATE project) align with a timescale of thousands, not billions, of years—supporting the young-earth chronology implicated by Psalm 136’s linkage of creation and recent redemptive acts.

Such empirical data make God’s “wonders” visible within the scientific enterprise.


Implications for Worship, Trust, and Evangelism

Because God “alone does great wonders,” believers anchor hope not in circumstances but in His unchanging chesed. Worship becomes intelligent response to historical fact, not mystical escapism. Evangelism rests on verifiable events—the Exodus, the cross, the empty tomb—rather than subjective sentiment. Psalm 136:4 therefore equips the Church to proclaim a faith that is both experiential and evidential.


Conclusion

Psalm 136:4 affirms God’s miraculous works by explicitly attributing every redemptive and creative “wonder” to Him alone, intertwining His power with His enduring love. Its language binds the entire narrative arc of Scripture, from Genesis creation to the resurrected Christ, into a cohesive testimony that the universe is neither accidental nor closed to divine intervention. For believer and skeptic alike, the verse stands as an invitation to recognize—and respond to—the God whose unmatched wonders continue to unfold.

How can acknowledging God's 'wonders' strengthen your faith during difficult times?
Top of Page
Top of Page