How does Psalm 86:8 challenge the belief in multiple gods? Text Of Psalm 86:8 “Among the gods there is none like You, O LORD; nor are any works like Yours.” Ancient Near Eastern Backdrop Ugaritic texts (14th-13th c. BC) list dozens of deities—Baal, Asherah, Mot—each limited to a sphere (e.g., storm, sea, death). Egyptian, Hittite, and Mesopotamian pantheons mirror this compartmentalization. Psalm 86 appears in that milieu, yet its author asserts one LORD (YHWH) whose “works” transcend every portfolio. The Moabite Stone (c. 840 BC) contrasts Chemosh’s defeat with YHWH’s victory, corroborating the Bible’s claim that Israel’s God operates outside regional bounds. Consistent Biblical Monotheism Deuteronomy 4:35; 6:4; Isaiah 43:10; 44:6-8; 45:5 all echo the Psalm’s sentiment. The testimony is seamless across Torah, Prophets, Writings, Gospels, and Epistles, preserved in over 5,800 Greek New Testament manuscripts and the Isaiah Scroll (1QIsᵃ) dated a millennium earlier than prior copies—each confirming divine singularity. Divine Works Unmatched 1. Creation: Genesis 1:1 attributes the cosmos to YHWH alone. Modern cosmology’s discovery that space-time had a beginning (Big Bang) aligns with the biblical declaration of an uncaused, transcendent Creator. 2. Providence: Archaeology confirms events such as the fall of Jericho’s walls (Kenyon & Garstang data, fallen outward) and the Davidic dynasty (Tel Dan Stele), displaying works no local god duplicated. 3. Incarnation & Resurrection: The minimal-facts argument—empty tomb, post-mortem appearances, disciples’ transformation—establishes Jesus’ bodily resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3-8). A pantheon cannot explain a single historical resurrection authenticated by 500+ eyewitnesses; it fits the actions of the unique covenant God. Philosophical Coherence Finite “gods” are contingent. Only a necessary, maximally great Being (Anselmian definition) suffices to ground morality, logic, and existence. Multiple necessary beings are logically impossible; necessity cannot be shared piecemeal without collapsing into contingency. Psalm 86:8 anticipates this by affirming one incomparable LORD. Psychological & Behavioral Dynamics Anthropological studies show polytheism proliferates when humans project fears onto specialized deities. Monotheism, by contrast, satisfies the innate desire for coherence and ultimate meaning (Ecclesiastes 3:11). Clinical research on religious coping (Pargament) reveals greater psychological resilience among monotheists who trust a sovereign, personal God rather than a fragmented pantheon. Christological Fulfillment John 1:1-3, Colossians 1:15-17, and Hebrews 1:2 identify Jesus as Creator. If “none” is like YHWH and Christ shares YHWH’s creative prerogatives, then Christ is included within the unique Godhead, not a lesser deity. The resurrection (Romans 1:4) vindicates His divine identity, sealing the monotheistic challenge posed in Psalm 86:8. The Holy Spirit’S Role Acts 5:3-4 equates lying to the Spirit with lying to God, situating the Spirit inside, not alongside, the circle of deity. The triune formulation (Matthew 28:19) maintains one essence, multiple persons—fully compatible with Psalm 86:8’s declaration of uniqueness while precluding polytheism. Conclusion Psalm 86:8 dismantles the plausibility of multiple gods by asserting YHWH’s peerless nature and deeds, corroborated by manuscript integrity, archaeological confirmation, philosophical necessity, scientific observation, and, supremely, the resurrection of Christ. |
    |