What does Romans 2:15 imply about the conscience of non-believers? Text “…since they show that the work of the Law is written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts either accusing or defending them.” — Romans 2:15 Literary Setting Romans 1:18 – 3:20 argues that every human—Jew or Gentile—is morally accountable. Paul has just declared that Gentiles “without the Law” sometimes “do by nature what the Law requires” (2:14). Verse 15 explains how: God Himself has etched a moral transcript upon every human heart. Innate Moral Awareness 1. Universal Imprint – Every person, regardless of culture, possesses an internal moral code. Cross-cultural anthropological work (e.g., shared prohibitions against murder, theft, and perjury) agrees with Paul’s claim that the Creator inscribed objective morality on humanity (Genesis 1:26–27). 2. Independent Witness – The conscience operates even where Scripture is absent; therefore non-believers are not morally neutral. 3. Self-Judgment – Thoughts “accusing or defending” reveal a built-in courtroom. Humanity is both defendant and jury, testifying that we know better than we do (cf. 1 John 3:20). Conscience and the Image of God Being made in God’s image includes moral sensibility. Conscience is thus evidence of design, not chance. Neuro-psychological studies show infants exhibit expectations of fairness before linguistic training; these findings are consistent with Romans 2:15 and inconsistent with a purely materialistic emergence of ethics. Conscience Across Scripture • Natural Law: Job 31:13–15 appeals to the Creator’s oversight apart from Sinai. • Heart Law: Deuteronomy 30:11–14; Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 36:26. • Conviction: John 8:9 (accusers of the adulteress leave “being convicted by their conscience”). • Corruption: 1 Timothy 4:2 (“seared”), Titus 1:15 (“defiled”), Hebrews 10:22 (“evil conscience”). • Cleansing: Hebrews 9:14 links a purified conscience to Christ’s blood. Dual Function: Accuse and Excuse Paul notes two operations: 1. Accusation – Triggering guilt, demonstrating universal sinfulness (Romans 3:23). 2. Defence – Providing limited approval when actions align with moral knowledge. Yet any defense is partial; perfect righteousness is lacking, driving the sinner to the gospel. Limitations of Conscience • Not Infallible – It can be misinformed or hardened by repeated sin. • Not Salvific – It points to guilt but cannot remove it; only Christ’s resurrection secures justification (Romans 4:25). • Not Autonomous – It must be calibrated by God’s written revelation for full reliability (Psalm 19:7–11). Pastoral and Practical Uses • Parenting – Appeal to the child’s God-given conscience alongside Scripture for discipline. • Counseling – Persistent guilt signals either unconfessed sin or a misinformed conscience; Scripture recalibrates both. • Society – Civil law resonates with conscience, restraining evil (Romans 13:3–4). Common Objections Answered • “Morals are societal constructs.” – Yet cultures vary in practice, not in core precepts (e.g., honesty valued universally). Romans 2:15 predicts this pattern. • “Evolution alone explains conscience.” – Natural selection cannot prescribe “ought,” only describe “is.” The moral ‘ought’ demands a transcendent source. • “If conscience suffices, why evangelize?” – Because conscience condemns; only Christ saves (Acts 4:12). Summary Proposition Romans 2:15 teaches that God endowed even non-believers with an internal moral law and a conscience that testifies to that law. This conscience is universal, God-given, simultaneously witness and judge, yet incapable of imparting righteousness. It renders every person accountable and thus exposes the urgent need for the gospel of the risen Christ, the sole remedy that cleanses the conscience and reconciles the sinner to God. |
    |