Romans 7:3: Marriage vow permanence?
What does Romans 7:3 imply about the permanence of marriage vows?

Romans 7:3

“So then, if she is joined to another man while her husband is alive, she will be called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law and is not an adulteress, even if she marries another man.”


Canonical Placement and Immediate Context

Paul is illustrating release from the Mosaic Law by appealing to the universally recognized bond of marriage. Verses 1–2 state that “the law lords it over a man only as long as he lives,” then cite the widow’s liberty to remarry as a self-evident example. Verse 3 completes the analogy: under God’s design, marriage binds husband and wife until death; only that terminal event dissolves the covenant. Paul’s illustration presupposes the permanence of marriage in order to argue that believers, having died with Christ, are no longer under the jurisdiction of the Law.


Historical-Legal Background

Jewish halakhah (cf. Deuteronomy 24:1–4) and Roman civil statutes both recognized lifelong fidelity as the standard, broken legitimately only by death. While Roman law allowed divorce, moral philosophers such as Musonius Rufus decried no-fault dissolution, and Jewish rabbis who followed Shammai permitted it only for sexual immorality. Paul writes to a mixed audience that shared the axiom: vows are lifelong; widowhood alone sets one free.


Linguistic Observations

“Will be called an adulteress” (chrēmatisei moichalis) denotes public designation. Paul is not merely theorizing but invoking a societal verdict; remarriage during a spouse’s life is objectively adultery. “Free from that law” (eleuthera apo tou nomou) reiterates total legal release, not a partial relaxation. The contrast hinges on death versus continued life — the one absolute boundary.


Marriage as Covenant Until Death

Genesis 2:24 establishes a one-flesh union instituted by God. Jesus reinforces this in Matthew 19:4–6: “What God has joined together, let no man separate.” Covenant language permeates Scripture (Proverbs 2:17; Malachi 2:14). Romans 7:3 assumes this covenantal permanence; it is not a new teaching but the apostolic restatement of an Edenic ordinance. Death, therefore, is the divinely appointed terminus.


Harmony with the Rest of the New Testament

1 Corinthians 7:39 – “A wife is bound to her husband as long as he lives.”

Mark 10:11–12 – Jesus calls remarriage after wrongful divorce adultery.

Hebrews 13:4 – “Marriage should be honored by all.”

Each passage aligns: vows endure until a spouse’s death. Romans 7:3 supplies the doctrinal backbone for these ethical directives.


Patristic Witness

• Chrysostom: “Nothing so welds our life together as the indissoluble bond of marriage; only death has power to loosen it.”

• Augustine: “If the flesh of one dies, the bond is loosed; if the bond is loosed while both live, adultery is born.”

Early fathers interpret Romans 7:3 as a straightforward affirmation of lifelong union.


Objections and Clarifications

a) Divorce for sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9) — Jesus permits, not commands, divorce; remarriage is outside Romans 7:3’s widow scenario and thus remains morally precarious.

b) Desertion by an unbeliever (1 Corinthians 7:15) — Paul grants relational release, yet nowhere calls the deserted believer “free to remarry.” The silence keeps Romans 7:3 intact as the normative rule.

c) Abuse or criminal endangerment — Church discipline may secure legal protection and separation, but the covenantal bond, per Romans 7:3, endures until death.


Typological Significance

Marriage mirrors Christ’s unbreakable love for His bride (Ephesians 5:25–32). The permanence asserted in Romans 7:3 prefigures the eternal security believers enjoy in union with the risen Lord. Just as death alone ends earthly marriage, only Christ’s once-for-all death ends the Law’s claim, inaugurating a new covenant relationship.


Ethical and Pastoral Implications

• Vow-making carries gravity; flippant exit strategies undermine the gospel symbol marriage embodies.

• Premarital counseling should emphasize Romans 7:3 as a divine boundary marker.

• Church discipline regarding divorce and remarriage must reflect the death-boundary principle.

• Widows and widowers possess full liberty to remarry “only in the Lord” (1 Corinthians 7:39), illustrating grace without guilt.


Conclusion

Romans 7:3 unequivocally teaches that marriage vows bind husband and wife for life; death alone dissolves the covenant and legitimizes remarriage. The verse functions both as ethical directive and theological illustration, coheres seamlessly with the whole canon, and remains textually uncontested. For the believer, honoring this permanence glorifies God, reflects Christ’s steadfast love, and witnesses to the unchanging reliability of His Word.

How does Romans 7:3 address the concept of marriage and adultery?
Top of Page
Top of Page