Sadducees' view on resurrection in Matt 22:24?
What does Matthew 22:24 reveal about the Sadducees' understanding of resurrection?

Setting the Scene

- The Sadducees, who “say there is no resurrection” (Acts 23:8), confront Jesus on the Tuesday of Passion Week.

- Their goal: discredit Him publicly by posing a dilemma they believe exposes the absurdity of bodily resurrection.


Matthew 22:24

“Teacher, Moses said, ‘If a man dies without children, his brother shall marry the widow and raise up offspring for him.’ ”


What the Verse Shows About the Sadducees’ Thinking

- They appeal to Moses because they regard only the Pentateuch as fully authoritative.

- By citing the levirate law (Deuteronomy 25:5-6), they assume any after-death existence must mirror present earthly relationships.

- They frame resurrection as if it would simply restart normal life—including marriage—which they find self-evidently impossible once multiple spouses are involved.

- Their hypothetical case (vv. 25-28) is designed not to learn but to ridicule the concept of resurrection.


Underlying Assumptions Exposed

- Resurrection, if real, must be merely an extension of temporal life.

- God’s law could be placed in logical conflict with itself, proving resurrection unworkable.

- Human reasoning can overrule supernatural revelation when the two seem incompatible.


Contrast with Jesus’ Teaching (vv. 29-32)

- Jesus corrects two errors: ignorance of Scripture and of God’s power.

- He affirms angel-like resurrected existence where earthly marriage no longer applies (v. 30).

- He proves resurrection from the very Pentateuch the Sadducees trust—“I am the God of Abraham… He is not the God of the dead, but of the living” (Exodus 3:6; Matthew 22:31-32).


Key Takeaways

- The Sadducees’ question reveals a materialistic, this-world-only mindset that cannot envision a glorified state.

- Limiting doctrine to human logic or a favored slice of Scripture leads to serious error.

- Jesus upholds both the authority of Moses and the reality of bodily resurrection, harmonizing law and promise without contradiction.

How does Matthew 22:24 illustrate the importance of understanding Mosaic Law's context?
Top of Page
Top of Page